What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

Oh God... That description really takes the wind out of the story... :(
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

ShirtlessBob said:
Gwyneth Paltrow is testifying to Congress about GMO labeling

Apparently, being a "concerned mother" now makes you an expert. However, there is proof that when Gwyneth Paltrow opens her mouth, she has a severe case of the derp.
Click to expand...

She was awesome on Glee, though.

I get why they have stars give testimony. It's really, really, really, really dumb, but it works. One of these talking hairdos puts in an appearance and a million letters come in. An actual scientist gives real information and... crickets.

Oh, and reading through those quotes, not all of them are derpy. The quote about Witherspoon is actually dead on: she is way better than most of the crap movies she makes.
 
Last edited:
Kepler said:
She was awesome on Glee, though.

I get why they have stars give testimony. It's really, really, really, really dumb, but it works. One of these talking hairdos puts in an appearance and a million letters come in. An actual scientist gives real information and... crickets.

Oh, and reading through those quotes, not all of them are derpy. The quote about Witherspoon is actually dead on: she is way better than most of the crap movies she makes.
Click to expand...

Speaking of that - see the dead thread.
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

They were losing 300 million gallons a year to evaporation and they hadn't tried anything to stop it until now?
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

Contrary to my alma mater, I am not an engineer, so I'm not going to feign knowledge of the thermodynamics involved here, but until I actually read through the whole thing, I thought you were posting an "article" on the level of FlagDUDE.
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

We are, we are, we are, we are, we aren't an engineer?
;)

So I've had an Aston of thermo classes. Between chemistry and chemical engineering its at least a year and a half maybe two years. I still don't get it.

Although them chemist in me should disclose I've had some ethanol tonight b
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

It's Friday and my brain is off and I've been drinking. Those qualifications.

Not the chemistry and chemical engineering qualifications.

I assume this was lost in translation/definition of qualification. ;)
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

dxmnkd316 said:
It's Friday and my brain is off and I've been drinking. Those qualifications.

Not the chemistry and chemical engineering qualifications.

I assume this was lost in translation/definition of qualification. ;)
Click to expand...

Ahhh...gotcha :p
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

Today's weapon of mass destruction

Missile launcher that weighs 200 kg has a range of 500m and a blast radius of 2km.

Never made it into production
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top