dave122793
Registered User
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
Try riding your gun to work tomorrow, then let us know how that works for you.
Try riding your gun to work tomorrow, then let us know how that works for you.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Days Since Last Shooting II
- Thread starter The Rube
- Start date
- Status
DisplacedCornellian
Let's Go Red!
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
PROVE the government isn't turning the frogs gay! Or that Alex Jones' magic herpadurp dust DOESN'T make you 1000% times smarter and attractive to women! Prove it!
PROVE the government isn't turning the frogs gay! Or that Alex Jones' magic herpadurp dust DOESN'T make you 1000% times smarter and attractive to women! Prove it!
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
When did he say anything about turning frogs gay? The harmful products turn a majority of amphibians sterile and/or asexual. Infowars gives PLENTY of proof on that. But no, if Stephen Colbert says it, it must be true.
When did he say anything about turning frogs gay? The harmful products turn a majority of amphibians sterile and/or asexual. Infowars gives PLENTY of proof on that. But no, if Stephen Colbert says it, it must be true.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
Let's add a Constitutional amendment for the right to own an automobile,
or,
Let's remove the Constitutional amendment to keep and bear arms.
Let's add a Constitutional amendment for the right to own an automobile,
or,
Let's remove the Constitutional amendment to keep and bear arms.
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
Looking at using alternative uses for the machines, using an automobile for intentional killing is much easier than what you ask.
Looking at using alternative uses for the machines, using an automobile for intentional killing is much easier than what you ask.
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
The 2nd Amendment?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
The purpose is to have a recourse for people against the US government - not other people. And as a citizen, you are not fighting against the government on a daily basis. You can be fully prepared to defend yourself against the government by keeping guns in your home only. If you decide to take up arms against the US government (per the second amendment), you will be breaking federal law likely anyways...and so will be able to take your gun out of the house to fight them.
Per law, the net result is that there should be no legal carrying of guns on public streets that put people in danger. And anyone (those open to committing criminal acts included) should be prosecuted for doing so. Not that we should stop street carrying of guns...but the second amendment doesn't protect it.
The 2nd Amendment?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
The purpose is to have a recourse for people against the US government - not other people. And as a citizen, you are not fighting against the government on a daily basis. You can be fully prepared to defend yourself against the government by keeping guns in your home only. If you decide to take up arms against the US government (per the second amendment), you will be breaking federal law likely anyways...and so will be able to take your gun out of the house to fight them.
Per law, the net result is that there should be no legal carrying of guns on public streets that put people in danger. And anyone (those open to committing criminal acts included) should be prosecuted for doing so. Not that we should stop street carrying of guns...but the second amendment doesn't protect it.
trixR4kids
Well-known member
Until someone can show me an instance where someone intentionally used a vehicle to successfully kill 50 and injure 500 they can **** off with that petarded comparison.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
The Heller decision allows us to pass laws regulating guns the same as we regulate cars. So, just stop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
It's all in there. And Scalia wrote it.
The Heller decision allows us to pass laws regulating guns the same as we regulate cars. So, just stop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
It's all in there. And Scalia wrote it.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
IINM the general consensus is that the Founders' intention was to keep a source of trained men ready to serve, as there was no standing army.
Once we created a standing army it became moot and should have been modified or repealed. The new life breathed into it by the NRA as a political marketing tool is perverse and utterly foreign to the original intent.
At some point people will have had enough of the murders and we'll repeal the Second, and the Usual Suspects will launch their war just like the last one they had to protect their ownership of slaves, and they'll lose because they're still unproductive, uneducated, and inept, and then we'll have two hundred more years of their whining, impotent butthurt until their next tantrum.
Or we can finally expel them from the Union and get on with facing the real challenges of a modern state and stop having to babysit these infants.
IINM the general consensus is that the Founders' intention was to keep a source of trained men ready to serve, as there was no standing army.
Once we created a standing army it became moot and should have been modified or repealed. The new life breathed into it by the NRA as a political marketing tool is perverse and utterly foreign to the original intent.
At some point people will have had enough of the murders and we'll repeal the Second, and the Usual Suspects will launch their war just like the last one they had to protect their ownership of slaves, and they'll lose because they're still unproductive, uneducated, and inept, and then we'll have two hundred more years of their whining, impotent butthurt until their next tantrum.
Or we can finally expel them from the Union and get on with facing the real challenges of a modern state and stop having to babysit these infants.
Last edited:
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
I have recently been informed that people will choose to break the law.
I have recently been informed that people will choose to break the law.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
ScoobyDoo
NPC
trixR4kids
Well-known member
Did he seriously just cite a bombing?
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
So with all of these postings you are trying to point out that cars and guns are equally bad and can equally kill people....
You are 100% ok with this shooting. And the recent shooting in Vegas. And the shooting in Orlando. and the next mass shootings- which will happen soon enough.
....Since we obviously can't do anything about it, even in the face of people offering ideas, that has to mean that you accept other people needlessly dying like what is constantly happening.
How about we nominate you to call the families.
So with all of these postings you are trying to point out that cars and guns are equally bad and can equally kill people....
You are 100% ok with this shooting. And the recent shooting in Vegas. And the shooting in Orlando. and the next mass shootings- which will happen soon enough.
....Since we obviously can't do anything about it, even in the face of people offering ideas, that has to mean that you accept other people needlessly dying like what is constantly happening.
How about we nominate you to call the families.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
And explosive are HEAVILY regulated. Thank you for making our case.
And explosive are HEAVILY regulated. Thank you for making our case.
trixR4kids
Well-known member
No it doesn’t, literally everyone here except the guy who only makes intellectually dishonest arguments and isn’t capable of having an honest debate cited a bombing when it was insanely obvious that I meant a car was being used as THE WEAPON ie not a bomb.
JFC you know you watch too much Fox News when..
The Sicatoka
Kicizapi Cetan
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
Heller is not everything you think it is.
It effectively stripped the words "well regulated militia" out of the Second.
And yes, it upheld things like concealed carry permitting.
Heller is not everything you think it is.
It effectively stripped the words "well regulated militia" out of the Second.
And yes, it upheld things like concealed carry permitting.
- Status