ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: Days Since Last Shooting II
You quoted Reagan. He didn't.
You keep being you.
You quoted Reagan. He didn't.
You keep being you.
You quoted Reagan. He didn't.
That's not a Reagan quote.
You quoted Reagan. He didn't.
The term was popularized in United States by Mark Twain (among others), who attributed it to the British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli: "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."
Try again. And his response was rather childish and added nothing.
I thought it added more than your quote. And quoting Mark Twain is pretty close to Reagan politics. That folksy vibe that gets us into North Korea.
Does it?
Yeah, it says that when you put people in close proximity to others, they'll kill each other more often than if they have space to be by themselves*. Except in New Mexico, Arizona, and Nevada, then they'll just kill each other for the heck of it.
*not the actual causation
By stating that anyone (left or right) can hand-pick statistics to satisfy their point of view? That's worse than a "herpaderp?" If you say so. Jebus.
By doing that you turn statistics into Fake News. Just like we've turned Science into fake news. Pretty soon we'll have to ask some combine in Kentucky what our government policies should be on all topics.
By doing that you turn statistics into Fake News. Just like we've turned Science into fake news. Pretty soon we'll have to ask some combine in Kentucky what our government policies should be on all topics.
By doing that you turn statistics into Fake News. Just like we've turned Science into fake news. Pretty soon we'll have to ask some combine in Kentucky what our government policies should be on all topics.
By stating that anyone (left or right) can hand-pick statistics to satisfy their point of view? That's worse than a "herpaderp?" If you say so. Jebus.
By dismissing a particular stat with that cliche, it comes across as saying "I'm not capable of distinguishing a useful stat from a not useful stat, so I'm going to dismiss all stats." That adds nothing.
By dismissing a particular stat with that cliche, it comes across as saying "I'm not capable of distinguishing a useful stat from a not useful stat, so I'm going to dismiss all stats." That adds nothing.
One must pay attention to many details and consider many stats.
Couldn't agree more, I just don't think that cliche is actually a short hand for what you're saying now.
Yes. For all the talk about Chicago and Detroit and their massive rates of gun violence (cause of dem Darkies!!!) take a look at the (no pun intended) darkest areas on the map. You could literally take that map and superimpose it on a map of the Confederacy and they would almost match. Dem Good Ole Boys just cant stop shooting each other...