Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
Re: Covid 19
I know, eh? The markets remain volatile. When I posted it, the Dow was up 500, when you posted, it was down 500, and now it looks like it's almost back to Friday's closing. Lesson learned.
I thought I might get a laugh out of you with "President Fauci", HR.
To be clear, I don't have any problems with Dr. Fauci, but it's kind of silly to think both Cuomo and Trump - not exactly best pals - are just going off on a lark by themselves without some degree of medical support for it, do you? The President hasn't put a lid on him - unlike some people in some Far Eastern country (want to be careful not to be "racially insensitive"
) - so let's let Dr. Fauci talk about the medicine, let the guys who got elected make the decisions and craft the message, and assume no one is going <s>"off the reservation"</s> oops, going off on their own. I know, it can be fun with good guys vs. bad guys sometimes, but in this case a good guy and a bad guy have agreed to pursue this latest course as of Tuesday, and the non-partisan expert is not telling them not to pursue it, right? Unless I'm missing some secret Fauci-code …
I probably agree with 90% of your post (which is usually the case), 'Watcher. I think the Cuomo-Trump "interim solution" should be rolled out, for that reason. Anything that helps is good. I don't read the 15 day period as a "cure", but I do think it's the first time we'll have to take a long hard look at whether the current strategy needs to be continued on a national basis, or not. There is no question the impact is worse in certain areas than others. But as I've raised a few times (mostly with Russell) on this thread … at some point, in some areas of the country, the "cure" is going to be worse than the disease. President Trump said that in last night's conference, possibly twice. At some point, I think it's fair to ask if different approaches need to be taken in different areas.
I don't want that to sound callous, but at some point, common sense says that responses and strategy may/should be different in Nebraska as opposed to California, or in Maine/NH/Vermont as opposed to New York - or even Upstate NY to New York City.
I think (hope) that's what might be coming up a week from today. But a lot of things can happen - negative OR positive - in the time in between. It certainly is a fluid situation ...
Umm...
I know, eh? The markets remain volatile. When I posted it, the Dow was up 500, when you posted, it was down 500, and now it looks like it's almost back to Friday's closing. Lesson learned.

Chuck, rather than repost your post...laughed about your "President Fauci" comment. Sorry he has to get up there and use science and facts to explain what's going on. I for one am not watching these things anymore as I need to know the basics around what's going on. I don't need to hear his personal pep rally for himself...What do you expect Fauci to do when the President is talking about things that, and with all due respect, aren't quite yet in the works? Fauci says the current ideas for drug therapies and possible results are anecdotal..there's nothing wrong with that, just like there's nothing wrong with the President offering hope to what could be possible. Fauci isn't going away. The President can kick him out of his group but he said in an interview over the weekend that 'while he doesn't expect to be fired, if he is, he'll keep on talking". Thank God for that.
I thought I might get a laugh out of you with "President Fauci", HR.

To be clear, I don't have any problems with Dr. Fauci, but it's kind of silly to think both Cuomo and Trump - not exactly best pals - are just going off on a lark by themselves without some degree of medical support for it, do you? The President hasn't put a lid on him - unlike some people in some Far Eastern country (want to be careful not to be "racially insensitive"


Maybe its fatigue from dragging the "hoax" crowd into reality, and now being faced with the magical "there will be a cure in 15 days" response. Trying to devise a plan that does't rely upon the assumption that this will all go away seems reasonable, not gleeful. Not sure that the "this is just the flu" crowd is really in a position to chastize others for being too pesimistc.
That said, I remind my kids how this highlights the hardships of prior generations, be it the sacrifice of going to a war that suddenly ended, or the fear of contracting polio, which thanks to science, Mr. Salk, suddenly goes away.
Yes, there may be such ground-shifting vaccine, but until then, we should not be planning on anything other than Dr. Fauci's 12-18 month timeline.
What interim solutions there may be to mitigate the societal cost is a worthy discussion. I welcome that discussion stripped of the political prism that clouds many of the responses.
I probably agree with 90% of your post (which is usually the case), 'Watcher. I think the Cuomo-Trump "interim solution" should be rolled out, for that reason. Anything that helps is good. I don't read the 15 day period as a "cure", but I do think it's the first time we'll have to take a long hard look at whether the current strategy needs to be continued on a national basis, or not. There is no question the impact is worse in certain areas than others. But as I've raised a few times (mostly with Russell) on this thread … at some point, in some areas of the country, the "cure" is going to be worse than the disease. President Trump said that in last night's conference, possibly twice. At some point, I think it's fair to ask if different approaches need to be taken in different areas.
I don't want that to sound callous, but at some point, common sense says that responses and strategy may/should be different in Nebraska as opposed to California, or in Maine/NH/Vermont as opposed to New York - or even Upstate NY to New York City.
I think (hope) that's what might be coming up a week from today. But a lot of things can happen - negative OR positive - in the time in between. It certainly is a fluid situation ...