What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">When we interviewed Peter Navarro, the White House official tasked with coordinating national PPE supplies, he was, at times, more interested in questioning 60 Minutes' record than discussing the Trump administration’s preparations for COVID-19. <a href="https://t.co/ikzbCJrI5l">https://t.co/ikzbCJrI5l</a> <a href="https://t.co/NQZOQwcI8y">pic.twitter.com/NQZOQwcI8y</a></p>— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) <a href="https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/1249493806237519873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 13, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

60 Minutes with the alley oop slam.

That is embarrassing :eek:
 
One (the only?) positive that can come from this is this right here. If more companies realize that working at home is not taboo and can lead to reducing traffic/pollution. You save your workers some gas money and potentially cut down on operating costs for your buildings as well.

I did leave out the negative portion of that report, which is that they’re expecting possibly even worse pollution than before, at least in the short term, following the lockdown as manufacturing tries to play catch-up.
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is just wild: Some experts think that the 49ers blowing their Super Bowl lead could have saved lives, because the loss kept SF from hosting a championship parade a few days later that could've spread the virus <a href="https://t.co/32d1UT8QnT">https://t.co/32d1UT8QnT</a></p>— Mark Berman (@markberman) <a href="https://twitter.com/markberman/status/1250055911776944128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 14, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Los Angeles with no smog..<br><br>Amazing aerial view of downtown from Echo Park <a href="https://t.co/MWD8z5wBuC">pic.twitter.com/MWD8z5wBuC</a></p>— Bill Gross (@Bill_Gross) <a href="https://twitter.com/Bill_Gross/status/1248800805525704705?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

There was a report on NPR a few weeks ago where they estimated that because China is one of the largest polluters, that just Hubei Province being shut down for four months during the lockdown should result in a 1% decrease in global emissions this year.

The ecological studies that come from this will be fascinating.

I did leave out the negative portion of that report, which is that they’re expecting possibly even worse pollution than before, at least in the short term, following the lockdown as manufacturing tries to play catch-up.

Understandable. And I would think that is a short term problem during the crisis. Long term I do think there are at least some positives that can come of this. The other being this is what happens when you get caught with your pants down (although it's not like we are the only country that has been hit hard by this). Perhaps this leads to major reform in terms of how the world handles this type of situation rather than just the US. There needs to be more coordination with the CDC/WHO, more transparency, communication, etc.

For the US, too much has been put on governors/mayors (although in this case it's probably best we have those people leading the way!). I'm all for small government but this is something that should be directed by the federal government. They should be in charge of obtaining all resources and distributing based on need for something like this. The bidding wars over resources has been embarrassing. An early nationwide two week shutdown would have been far more beneficial than the state by state approach based on once you are already in crisis mode. And yes, a two week national shutdown hurts the economy but I can't imagine it would hurt it more than what we have seen with this prolonged problem. I am not an economist but I am sure that is being studied as well.
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

I did leave out the negative portion of that report, which is that they’re expecting possibly even worse pollution than before, at least in the short term, following the lockdown as manufacturing tries to play catch-up.

I read that overall they are expecting drops near 5% worldwide (largest since WW2) but yeah it will be short term at best and they dont expect much change after things open up fully. Hey though any little victory will be nice...
 
Think of the coal miners children!
Haha!

But, taking a serious look, in the whole United States there are just 54,000 coal miners.

More people were laid off by IBM in 1993 than would be if we told the entire coal industry to get bent.

Also single corporations who laid off similar as IBM:
Citigroup, 2008; 50,000
Sears, 1993; 50,000
GM, 2009; 47,000
AT&T, 1996; 40,000
Ford, 2002; 35,000

But yet, so much handwringing over 50k coal miners over countless companies who could assign them other mining jobs (likely).
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

Electric cars are basically burning coal, and natural gas, with some added middle men for transport and refining. Plus they use giant batteries that are not really easy to produce or recycle responsibly. As things are now, electric is far less environmentally friendly than just burning the gas right in the car. Unless you're saying, "poor kids", because all those miners will be working overtime to support the power draw.
We need to build a bunch of nuke plants.
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

Electric cars are basically burning coal, and natural gas, with some added middle men for transport and refining. Plus they use giant batteries that are not really easy to produce or recycle responsibly. As things are now, electric is far less environmentally friendly than just burning the gas right in the car. Unless you're saying, "poor kids", because all those miners will be working overtime to support the power draw.
We need to build a bunch of nuke plants.

They're basically burning coal and natural gas because that's what is generating the electricity, right? If over time electricity is more created from renewable fuels, then electric cars would essentially be "burning" those, would they not? And while I understand we're not there yet, that would be the ultimate goal, that electric cars would be fueled by more renewable fuels that way, whereas gas-powered cars always need gas by definition.
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

They're basically burning coal and natural gas because that's what is generating the electricity, right? If over time electricity is more created from renewable fuels, then electric cars would essentially be "burning" those, would they not? And while I understand we're not there yet, that would be the ultimate goal, that electric cars would be fueled by more renewable fuels that way, whereas gas-powered cars always need gas by definition.

Yes, exactly
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

They're basically burning coal and natural gas because that's what is generating the electricity, right? If over time electricity is more created from renewable fuels, then electric cars would essentially be "burning" those, would they not? And while I understand we're not there yet, that would be the ultimate goal, that electric cars would be fueled by more renewable fuels that way, whereas gas-powered cars always need gas by definition.

Yeah, I mean, aren't a lot of power plants producing electricity with a lot of renewables now? It's not all coal.
 
Haha!

But, taking a serious look, in the whole United States there are just 54,000 coal miners.

More people were laid off by IBM in 1993 than would be if we told the entire coal industry to get bent.

Also single corporations who laid off similar as IBM:
Citigroup, 2008; 50,000
Sears, 1993; 50,000
GM, 2009; 47,000
AT&T, 1996; 40,000
Ford, 2002; 35,000

But yet, so much handwringing over 50k coal miners over countless companies who could assign them other mining jobs (likely).

And shuttting down USPS would be around 600k
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

Yeah, I mean, aren't a lot of power plants producing electricity with a lot of renewables now? It's not all coal.

It's 30% coal, 35% NG, and 20% nukes. We've got miles and miles to go before buying an electric car makes any sense.
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/236x/18/dc/ae/18dcae06a5105f92100dd03d5dd027c9--kentucky-girls-sissy-spacek.jpg" />

That was before meth mouth, a.k.a. "flyover fluoride."

Updated:

<img src="https://www.northboundtreatment.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/3759718528_a9ab7eb527_o.png" >
 
Re: COVID-19 The 7th Part: We're Gonna Be Number One Soon!

Electric cars are basically burning coal, and natural gas, with some added middle men for transport and refining. Plus they use giant batteries that are not really easy to produce or recycle responsibly. As things are now, electric is far less environmentally friendly than just burning the gas right in the car. Unless you're saying, "poor kids", because all those miners will be working overtime to support the power draw.
We need to build a bunch of nuke plants.

it totally depends on where you live. I read a research paper that compared pollution generated by electric cars accounting for battery production and charging vs gasoline (I have no idea where to find this now, sorry).

it concluded that in countries or states with cleaner than average energy the electric cars were better environmentally. If it's a coal-heavy state then no.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is just wild: Some experts think that the 49ers blowing their Super Bowl lead could have saved lives, because the loss kept SF from hosting a championship parade a few days later that could've spread the virus <a href="https://t.co/32d1UT8QnT">https://t.co/32d1UT8QnT</a></p>— Mark Berman (@markberman) <a href="https://twitter.com/markberman/status/1250055911776944128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 14, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

We knew Jimmy G was Jesus.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top