What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Covfefe-19 The 12th Part: The Only Thing Worse Than This New Board Is TrumpVirus2020

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whalers said:
Do as we are told when? When Fauci said we didnt need to wear masks? When he said that we actually did need to wear masks? Or when he went to the ballgame and DIDN'T wear his mask?

When the WHO and the MSM said that we needed to lock down to "Stop the Spread"? Or when the WHO said that we NEVER should have locked down, that this did FAR more harm than the actual wuhan virus? The MSM media STILL hasn't reported that little tidbit.
Click to expand...

We can start a little list, right here, for those who were WRONG about the "need" for lockdowns. You know ... you folks who preached (or worse yet, continue to preach) the urgent need for lockdowns. As opposed to those of us who, from the outset, stated the patently obvious FACT that lockdowns as a measure were a FAR worse "cure" than the underlying COVID condition.

Go ahead folks, write your names down, and own up to being wrong. Do the right thing ...

#sometimesevenscienceguesseswrong
 
Chuck Murray said:
We can start a little list, right here, for those who were WRONG about the "need" for lockdowns. You know ... you folks who preached (or worse yet, continue to preach) the urgent need for lockdowns. As opposed to those of us who, from the outset, stated the patently obvious FACT that lockdowns as a measure were a FAR worse "cure" than the underlying COVID condition.

Go ahead folks, write your names down, and own up to being wrong. Do the right thing ...

#sometimesevenscienceguesseswrong
Click to expand...

Chuck, the #BedWetter PR is on the way, to paint you as a flip flopper. They will find a way to paint In any light they choose, someone who has known from the onset, the massive issues lockdowns would create.

And just think, we didn’t even lockdown hard enough.

‘Lockdown is a terrible experiment’

https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/1...mpression=true

"One of the basic principles of public health is that you do not just look at one disease – you have to look at health as a whole, including all kinds of diseases, over a long period. That is not what has been done with Covid-19."

The #BedWetter PR Squad will most certainly discredit in anyway they choose, this epidemiologist from Harvard as being invalid. Versus addressing the very valid points he makes and if the disagree sharing their opinion.
 
Last edited:
leswp1 said:
Been off for awhile. Sort of like watching a soap opera. Same stories, different day.

Hair loss can occur 6-8wks after any serious illness and after birth. Basically the hair follicles pause production if you have any significant stress on body.

Sigh. Our whole area is turning red again- in direct correlation to the Dumpers putting up their Dump signs. Nice big swath of red. And we are still going to school, because, well, why not
Click to expand...

I was talking to a guy I work with last week and he said his son’s school was going to start in person next week. It’s hard to wrap my head round why you would want more people together at the exact moment things are getting worse. I know it’s not easy being in government right now but you would think they would be pulling out all the stops to slow things down before winter starts.
 
Drew S. said:
I was talking to a guy I work with last week and he said his son’s school was going to start in person next week. It’s hard to wrap my head round why you would want more people together at the exact moment things are getting worse. I know it’s not easy being in government right now but you would think they would be pulling out all the stops to slow things down before winter starts.
Click to expand...

Because kids are at no statistical risk and neither are almost all adults.

And because keeping kids out of school will not eliminate a virus. That is not how it works, never has and it never will.
 
Drew S. said:
I was talking to a guy I work with last week and he said his son’s school was going to start in person next week. It’s hard to wrap my head round why you would want more people together at the exact moment things are getting worse. I know it’s not easy being in government right now but you would think they would be pulling out all the stops to slow things down before winter starts.
Click to expand...

There's your problem. Thinking.

Lots of push to get kids to go back to school in the communities with low disease burden. The kids need to go back etc. Haven't seen an epidemiologist yet who thinks this is a smart idea. I have seen various pediatricians, psych people saying it is SOOOOOO necessary. They are looking at the kids as if they were an isolated entity.

If we weren't a mobile society this might make sense. There isn't much disease and if they all stay in place nothing much comes in.

We are, however, a mobile society. Many of the people we have in my town commute an hour to get to work. If they are all in their containers then the traveling affects those they work with and their families. If they come home, expose the kids to it and the kids go to school then it seeds the community. The kids in the class come home and in turn seed their families who head out to work. In no time you have hundreds of people involved and interconnected.

When the kids were home then the only people we were worrying about were those who worked. Workplaces could attempt to mitigate exposure and risk. Now we add the kids in and we have a bunch of asymptomatic vectors.

It seems so simple to me. With a degree in Community Health it was drilled into us to find the source and isolate it. We still do this with little quibbling if the person has TB and that is a helluva lot less speedy to cause death. They shut schools, contact trace, test, treat and everyone is on the bandwagon.

When all the childhood diseases were rampant the public was much better at quarantine and we had a robust public health system. Now we have a gutted Public Health system, the CDC, FDA and HHS being run by unqualified people, a public who are selfish, spoiled and has no collective experience with how to deal with infectious disease. It is the perfect storm. Now we have the Vector in Chief and (words fail me).

My conclusion- We should tell people that folks with C-19 have TB. It would solve everything.
 
Drew S. said:
I was talking to a guy I work with last week and he said his son’s school was going to start in person next week. It’s hard to wrap my head round why you would want more people together at the exact moment things are getting worse. I know it’s not easy being in government right now but you would think they would be pulling out all the stops to slow things down before winter starts.
Click to expand...

lol nah. Most schools here started in person ~2 weeks ago. Like magic cased have gone to zero errrrrrr doubled since then. Positivity is up and distribution across ages is pretty static, so the kids are sharing it, not just keeping it to themselves. Who possibly could have known Rs were lying when they said kids can't spread it.
 
Also, regarding the WHO. I thought they were bad? Now they're good? I can't keep up.

The US never locked down, not in intention or reality. Other countries did, and that's what the WHO is addressing. None of us here were ever actually confined to our homes.

But hey, the morons have never let facts get in the way before, why start now?
 
afb050320_color-1050x750.jpg


moving-the-goalposts-gif-2.gif
 
And actually, WHO said long term lockdown were not good, or wanted. Lockdowns were necessary however, until strong testing and contact tracing programs could be implemented.

Sure glad our president got right on that. Right, Chuckles?

Don't you experience even the least little bit of shame or embarrassment over your sources you use to buttress your claims? You know, like Project Veritas and your Chinese whistleblower. What was the deal with them again?
 
Swansong said:
Also, regarding the WHO. I thought they were bad? Now they're good? I can't keep up.

The US never locked down, not in intention or reality. Other countries did, and that's what the WHO is addressing. None of us here were ever actually confined to our homes.

But hey, the morons have never let facts get in the way before, why start now?
Click to expand...


You are right, you can't keep up. I don't blame you though, I can't imagine what it is like trying to get around in a soiled diaper 24/7.

In regards to the WHO, you are being mocked.

The US never locked down? Good to know all the consequences, job losses, other health issues compiling, miss handling of LTCF must all be imagined.
 
Swansong said:
The US never locked down, not in intention or reality.

But hey, the #wetthebedder's have never let facts get in the way before, why start now?
Click to expand...

Said ZERO residents polled in New York City ever. Swansong, I know that you proclaim to be one of the sharpest knives in the drawer, but how are you parsing the term lockdown? Depends on what your definition of the word is is? A simple search appears to show A LOT of headlines with this word in the title. From across the pond, some REAL NEWS.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-lockdown.html

NYC - Times Square
- on Avg 330,000 walk thru EVERY day (wait, I think I see one - 329,999 to go)

shutterstock_1685116432-1-1024x683.jpg


Holland Tunnel "Rush" Hour - Friday May 1st

image0-3-1024x683.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top