Oh, I don't care if they kill themselves. But they need modern brakes so they can't murder someone worthwhile.
Likewise with Republicans. I actively encourage them to experiment with alcohol and pills late at night home alone. But not when a human life is at risk.
The really dumb thing about the "argument" is if you pay attention to how they drive the old cars without safety items. A car like a Model A Ford (which is kind of modern- a real body, etc)- not many drivers of those cars will drive them beyond the capability of the car. And if they increase the capability, most car people I know (which are a lot, since I'm a car guy- remember my old name) will increase the safety capability- better brakes, harness, roll bar/cage, etc. Oh, and if you do own an old car you drive a lot and love- you are REALLY likely to keep the car in tip top condition- so everything works as best it will.
So it's a pretty weak argument in the real world.
Let alone if you extrapolate the time that cars were the most deadly, COVID remains more deadly (and transmittable) to the unvaccinated compared to auto deaths.
edit- just considered one more thing- because of how dangerous and relatively deadly cars were, laws were written to increase the safety of vehicles. Which have been mostly supported by all sides considering it has saved so many lives. Even recently, back up cameras were required for cars, due to the handful of kids that were killed when run over backing up. Not sure how many billions of dollars consumers happily pay for cars that are safer- but it's probably over $100B a year in the US.
But somehow, all of these preventable deaths from COVID are not only OK, but generally encouraged.
So the fact that government stepped in to make cars safer makes the general argument rather absurd.