Re: Covfefe-19 Part 9: Shelter In Place is Temporary, but Wu-Tang is Forever
Thank Parise for the Onion. Good satire is such a wonderful weapon.
Thank Parise for the Onion. Good satire is such a wonderful weapon.
Seems to me we've epic failed this entire thing. The news today was worse than it has been since the first day. You're either going to get it and die OR you're going to get it and live. One or the other.
Seems to me we've epic failed this entire thing. The news today was worse than it has been since the first day. You're either going to get it and die OR you're going to get it and live. One or the other.
Uh...thanks dr scooby
Rumor has it that REAL men don't get COVID. Only snowflake beta males with weak immune systems.![]()
Of course, if they are down then one would actually be taking that difference out of the smaller "before" number. If the idea is to establish how many people have died of COVID-19, then a drop in auto deaths can mask a higher COVID lethality.
If the idea is to establish the net effect of COVID-19, including changes in other forms of mortality driven by COVID-19, you just leave them in. All deaths count the same. But remember, if you die of a third condition you're giving a half death to COVID.![]()
Not a Dr. As I understand it, however, containment is a key part of the protocols for a pandemic. We have containment failure in the United States.
Obviously a very small sample size, but Minnesota has seen a surge in traffic deaths, not a decrease, since shelter in place was implemented. This has occurred despite lower traffic and accident numbers.
The theory, for what it's worth, is that with fewer cards on the road, drivers feel like they can drive significantly faster, and as the saying goes, speed kills.
Obviously a very small sample size, but Minnesota has seen a surge in traffic deaths, not a decrease, since shelter in place was implemented. This has occurred despite lower traffic and accident numbers.
The theory, for what it's worth, is that with fewer cards on the road, drivers feel like they can drive significantly faster, and as the saying goes, speed kills.
We're gonna do the Sweden method, whether we want to or not.
Thanks Donnie. Elections have consequences.
In personal news, I'm staying home from work again. Woke up with a weird, splitting headache yesterday that hasn't gone away, and since going back to bed after calling the boss, have had the chills. Temp of 98.7 though, so don't know what to make of it all.
I have had two friends last week get hit- fever, headaches, unable to talk and sleeping most of day. As of last week, MN wouldn’t test them unless they needed to be hospitalized so both stayed home and didn’t get tested
Obviously a very small sample size, but Minnesota has seen a surge in traffic deaths, not a decrease, since shelter in place was implemented. This has occurred despite lower traffic and accident numbers.
The theory, for what it's worth, is that with fewer cards on the road, drivers feel like they can drive significantly faster, and as the saying goes, speed kills.
I think you’re right. Hasn’t the number of 100+ MPH tickets gone WAY up?
We're gonna do the Sweden method, whether we want to or not.
Thanks Donnie. Elections have consequences.
In personal news, I'm staying home from work again. Woke up with a weird, splitting headache yesterday that hasn't gone away, and since going back to bed after calling the boss, have had the chills. Temp of 98.7 though, so don't know what to make of it all.
However, there is a darker possibility. Officials could be pursuing a different strategy to defeat the virus: herd immunity. If roughly two-thirds of the population contracts the virus (and if the resulting antibodies are both universal and long-lasting, which is not at all clear), then statistically the virus will not find enough new victims to perpetuate itself, and will eventually die out. The New York Times reports that even as Trump urges states to re-open, his own analysts behind the scenes are predicting 200,000 daily new cases and 3,000 deaths per day by the end of June — which is what someone pursing a herd immunity strategy would do. The problem is that, as scientists Carl T. Bergstrom and Natalie Dean explain in the Times, it will take months for the statistics to shake out, and the eventual infection rate will rise well past two-thirds — likely about 80-90 percent. With a U.S. population of about 330 million and the most recent estimates of infection fatality rate of about 1 percent, that means something like 2.6 to 3 million Americans dying.
Even if Trump is not actively aiming at herd immunity, there is no indication that he is even considering the test, track, and isolate option, let alone starting to construct the elaborate and efficient bureaucracy that would be needed. Neither is there any sign that he would be capable of doing such a thing even if he wanted to.