What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

An observation --State and local governments are going to be in a cash squeeze if businesses stay closed.

And that's where the federal government should be stepping in. You know, that government you hate so much.

Think of it this way: All those people who are gonna end up suffering? They're just very old baybeez. Protect them.
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

And that's where the federal government should be stepping in. You know, that government you hate so much.

Think of it this way: All those people who are gonna end up suffering? They're just very old baybeez. Protect them.

They left the womb. I say, let em crash.

<img src="https://www.thefeeherytheory.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Screen-Shot-2015-11-12-at-9.57.16-AM.png" height=200>
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

I watched your video. The first thing she did is assume a 45% infection rate.

Yeah I get that everyone is just guessing, but where is there even a scintilla of evidence this will get to 20%, let alone 45%?

I literally showed you the numbers for 5% so who cares about 20%.

330 million x .05 = 16.5 million
16.5 million x .05 (the critical care rate in China) = 825,000

We dont have that many ventilators most likely in this country let alone that many free ones.

I get you are trying to stay calm but ignoring math is just plain ridiculous. If 9 out of 10 people DONT have it and 9 out of 10 of the ones who do have it DONT need ventilators we are still screwed. If 95 out of hundred dont have it, and 95 out of a hundred out of the ones that do dont need critical care we are still screwed.
 
Last edited:
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Florida has one of the most TACTICALLY STUPID governors in the United States. <a href="https://t.co/1bRwdudFYG">https://t.co/1bRwdudFYG</a></p>— Katie Phang (@KatiePhang) <a href="https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1242205981649625088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

My employer is closing doors to all buildings in the nation except for Vice President approved people. Indefinitely.
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NEW: Want to see why Dems are resisting the GOP bill? This is who it EXCLUDES.<br><br>· community-based nursing homes<br>· community mental health providers<br>· home health<br>· group homes for individuals w disabilities<br>· rape crises centers<br>· community health centers <a href="https://t.co/CSwAGnKRBY">https://t.co/CSwAGnKRBY</a></p>— Andy Slavitt @ 🏡 (@ASlavitt) <a href="https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/1242106449012105222?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
I literally showed you the numbers for 5% so who cares about 20%.

330 million x .05 = 16.5 million
16.5 million x .05 (the critical care rate in China) = 825,000

We dont have that many ventilators most likely in this country let alone that many free ones.

I get you are trying to stay calm but ignoring math is just plain ridiculous. If 9 out of 10 people DONT have it and 9 out of 10 of the ones who do have it DONT need ventilators we are still screwed. If 95 out of hundred dont have it, and 95 out of a hundred out of the ones that do dont need critical care we are still screwed.
The problem is though that nobody’s sister is making a video saying 0.1% will get this or 5% will get it. Instead we have people like your Twitter doctor or the California governor claiming 45% which freaks people out, including many here, when there is no basis for it. It’s like Trump saying we’ll have a vaccine next week. No scientific basis for it and it’s extremely misleading and counter-productive.
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Florida has one of the most TACTICALLY STUPID governors in the United States. <a href="https://t.co/1bRwdudFYG">https://t.co/1bRwdudFYG</a></p>— Katie Phang (@KatiePhang) <a href="https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1242205981649625088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

yet.
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NEW: Want to see why Dems are resisting the GOP bill? This is who it EXCLUDES.<br><br>· community-based nursing homes<br>· community mental health providers<br>· home health<br>· group homes for individuals w disabilities<br>· rape crises centers<br>· community health centers <a href="https://t.co/CSwAGnKRBY">https://t.co/CSwAGnKRBY</a></p>— Andy Slavitt @ 🏡 (@ASlavitt) <a href="https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/1242106449012105222?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also, keeps private for six months who Trump awards money to from his $500 billion slush fund.
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

The problem is though that nobody’s sister is making a video saying 0.1% will get this or 5% will get it. Instead we have people like your Twitter doctor or the California governor claiming 45% which freaks people out, including many here, when there is no basis for it. It’s like Trump saying we’ll have a vaccine next week. No scientific basis for it and it’s extremely misleading and counter-productive.

Is it better to over-react when taking precautions, or under-react?

Maybe people need to be scared. It's the only way to get them to not be selfish pr!cks, and do the right thing for a change.
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

The problem is though that nobody’s sister is making a video saying 0.1% will get this or 5% will get it. Instead we have people like your Twitter doctor or the California governor claiming 45% which freaks people out, including many here, when there is no basis for it. It’s like Trump saying we’ll have a vaccine next week. No scientific basis for it and it’s extremely misleading and counter-productive.

IINM there is a Lancet article which posits the final infection rate at most probably 20-40%. From there it talks about a 1-2% fatality rate.

Apply those numbers to the US population (330M) and you get 660,000 - 2,640,000.

Fatalities.
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

My employer is closing doors to all buildings in the nation except for Vice President approved people. Indefinitely.

We just got told one of our union stewards is now hospitalized with it (not from the company, mind you).

We've been getting our temperature taken as we enter the building since Saturday. I came in with a balmy 95.3 today. Yesterday someone registered a 68. We're pretty sure they might be dead. Who said this virus didn't produce zombies?
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

The problem is though that nobody’s sister is making a video saying 0.1% will get this or 5% will get it. Instead we have people like your Twitter doctor or the California governor claiming 45% which freaks people out, including many here, when there is no basis for it. It’s like Trump saying we’ll have a vaccine next week. No scientific basis for it and it’s extremely misleading and counter-productive.

Im curious if you consider the CDC’s potential 160 million to 210 million possible infections to be the same as Dr. Twitter
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

An observation --State and local governments are going to be in a cash squeeze if businesses stay closed.

A whole lot of people are going to be in a cash squeeze. Financially this sucks for working people who no longer have jobs.
 
Re: Covfefe-19 - Part 4- Stay the **** Home

IINM there is a Lancet article which posits the final infection rate at most probably 20-40%. From there it talks about a 1-2% fatality rate.

Apply those numbers to the US population (330M) and you get 660,000 - 2,640,000.

Fatalities.

Pish posh, Hovey says there's no way that's gonna happen.

He's got data, and stuff.
 
Im curious if you consider the CDC’s potential 160 million to 210 million possible infections to be the same as Dr. Twitter

I think it’s unrealistic.

But that’s the nice thing. I guess we’ll see. I’m sure there will be plenty of people around here to rub it in my face.

The one thing we know is that the US response has been extraordinarily sub-optimal, from what I’ve read here, so I won’t have to listen to people explain away the numbers that way if we’re nowhere near 160 million.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top