WeAreNDHockey
\../ \../
So just another day in the life of a typical cop then?
Doesn’t there need to be some sort of evidence of negligence or an intentional act? I would think they would investigate for a bit before they throw the book at the guy.
Probably Cause is a fairly nebulous term in practice, isn't it? The facts, as we know them:
Am I missing anything? The third part eliminates alcohol impairment but not any other potentiality. Arresting the driver is the safe bet here.
- Driver drove his car hard into a store window
- One DOA, multiple injuries
- Driver passed a breathalyzer on scene
Wouldn’t you rule out vehicle defect and at least have some sort of theory on what happened? If this guy is completely innocent I’m sure he’s traumatized enough from the accident and doesn’t need the police to make it that much worse.
Guy who stepped in to beat the crap out of the Colorado Q club killer was arrested and held by police once they arrived on the scene. Because he was covered in blood.
Cuffed and held in a cruiser for some time, while he kept begging them to let him go so he could check on his family.
Back The Blue!!!!
I am the last person on this forum who would routinely defend the police, but in this case they did not really overstep their bounds unless they either brutalized the guy while he was cuffed or held him needlessly once his actions were more completely understood. If I shoot an armed intruder in my home and then dialed 911 I would expect the police to put me in cuffs while they secured my gun and the scene and made sure my story checked out, at least somewhat. And I am a middle aged, middle class, straight white guy. Having said that I am going simply by what your post noted. I have no idea what happened beyond that.
That might take weeks.
This person was arrested hours after the incident, so presumably there was discussion about it and it wasn't just a rash move by an on-the-scene officer.
Lots of innocent people are arrested, why concern over this particular one?