Republicans will surely charge him with two murders right?
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...atally-shoots-woman-after-struggle-over-taser
Republicans will surely charge him with two murders right?
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...atally-shoots-woman-after-struggle-over-taser
All we need is separate fetus laws since they're not considered persons under the law. I have no problem with that. Republicans do though. They would go ape**** with different laws and standards for fetuses.
That’s not inconsistent at all lol.
Republicans will surely charge him with two murders right?
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...atally-shoots-woman-after-struggle-over-taser
That’s not inconsistent at all lol.
It is consistent, a woman getting an abortion is consensual whereas her fetus being murdered isn't. This is not hard even for you.That's my point. Make it consistent. Federal level.
It is consistent, a woman getting an abortion is consensual whereas her fetus being murdered isn't. This is not hard even for you.
Women having rights over their own body is a very difficult concept
No, it's pretty simple. As soon as the man creates the fetus the body is no longer yours.
Oh, no. It's extremely difficult for him.
Kiss my ***. While I'm not personally pro-choice, I AM for the law being that way.
Let's play devil's advocate. Let's say the woman was on her way to perform an abortion, but her and her fetus was killed in a car crash by a drunk driver? What then? You probably would have proof in the way of text messages/phone calls to friends and family about having the abortion...
Either it's a life, or it's not. Make it consistent.
Thanks for making my point for me.
Not even close, Scoobs. In that example, she was on her way to do it herself (not a crime) but on the way there, someone did it for her (crime). That's inconsistent in logic. She was going to do it anyway, and yet the other driver gets charged with 2 murders, not 1.
Keep digging.