What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Congratulations Trinity!

Re: Congratulations Trinity!

Just to clear things up for those of you who actually want to acknowledge, understand, comprehend, and learn about the system that creates the DIII Mens Championship field, 1 loss by your team, 1 win by your team, 1 loss by another team, 1 win by another team, and simply just sitting idle and having other teams around you win and or lose 1 game CAN and DOES significantly determine your rank/position in the field due to the criteria the committee uses and the fact most teams in the Top 8-10 are so close ONE loss and/or win CAN and DOES change things...add in upsets in conference tournaments and on the flip side the predicted teams winning, it can free up and or eliminate Pool C bids and reshuffle the teams in the running for a Pool C bid.

...and to add more to what Prez said, Trinity's Coach acknowledged their SOS hurt their chances at the tournament last year and a major reason why they are upping their NC schedule (we've already heard Trinity to Norwich Tourn.)

2013-2014
Salve Regina
Wentworth
Stonehill
Manhattanville (maybe?)
Western NE
Becker

to

2014-2015
Umass Dartmouth
Umass Boston
Utica
Hobart
Plymouth State
Western NE

Back to your regularly scheduled program....


Zzzzzzzz.

I never read your posts anymore, because there's no point on doing so. I will assume that you were attempting to parse the data in such a way that favors PSU, as per usual. (As if Platty deserved home-ice vs. Trinity, FCS!)

The significant data has favored Trinity for two straight years, even if the NCAA shunned them last year for no apparent reason.

And, if no other reason than that, I'm glad that Trinity won the little tournament and made the D-3 process look idiotic yet again. (As if they needed any help doing so.)
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

Zzzzzzzz.
That's about your speed...

I never read your posts anymore, because there's no point on doing so.
Obviously you did...

I will assume that you were attempting to parse the data in such a way that favors PSU, as per usual. (As if Platty deserved home-ice vs. Trinity, FCS!)
It came down to Plattsburgh and Norwich in the 2014 tournament in which certain criteria were weighted and given to Norwich for Pool C. Plattsburgh won the AQ bid in 2015 and in doing so had a criteria lead on Trinity, thus giving them the home ice game. It's not hard to understand....well for most....

The significant data has favored Trinity for two straight years, even if the NCAA shunned them last year for no apparent reason.

This is what confuses people. You spew your bogus "significant" data speech but guess what, it means as much as you......**crickets**.... what's "significant" is the criteria the Selection Committee uses, not what Fishwoman thinks they should use....hence why some of us actually take the time to explain things, and not it should / shouldn't be. Instead you'd rather confuse people and try to get them to believe your way is the way things are decided.....

FYI The "significant" data had a SOS so rock bottom for Trinity, it kept them out....as has been stated over and over and over, but yet you still don't comprehend.......
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

That's about your speed...



FYI The "significant" data had a SOS so rock bottom for Trinity, it kept them out....as has been stated over and over and over, but yet you still don't comprehend.......

The KRACH weighs SOS and W% above all else, as well it should, and Trinity was easily the top team in the East in that regard. The NCAA's BS rankings had no integrity in the net, respecting neither criteria. Go ahead and love them if you want, but the NCAA just does what it wants, clearly, and without an ounce of accountability required of them. Their "rankings" are not worth the paper they're printed on.

You have proven time and time again that you have no grasp on what constitutes a meaningful set of statistics. Just because the NCAA has a set of plastic "rules", doesn't mean that its rules have any merit, do you understand that? And how does your little mind account for Trinity dropping from #1 in their silly rankings to out of the picture entirely, if that's what you take for gospel?

As per usual, you grasp at straws and have no leg to stand-on in either argument. But I wish you a good off-season anyway.
 
Last edited:
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

It's OVER! Put a sock in it folks!

Cripes, this is becoming a cut and paste of 10 other thread rehashes.
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

I gotta stop taking vacations I miss it all.......sounds like it was a great game and Trinity just seemed to good to be beat, I did see a few periods vs Adrian and they looked fassssst,can anybody tel me how the overall game went?? did any team dominate??
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

I gotta stop taking vacations I miss it all.......sounds like it was a great game and Trinity just seemed to good to be beat, I did see a few periods vs Adrian and they looked fassssst,can anybody tel me how the overall game went?? did any team dominate??

Trinity looked to dominate in large stretches, they always had a guy in front of the net to bury rebounds were a very fast team. Defensively their guys weren't afraid to use their bodies to block shots, they kept Point's shots to the outside and protected their goaltender, overall they looked like the better team.
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

Trinity looked to dominate in large stretches, they always had a guy in front of the net to bury rebounds were a very fast team. Defensively their guys weren't afraid to use their bodies to block shots, they kept Point's shots to the outside and protected their goaltender, overall they looked like the better team.
thanks for the info.
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

Trinity looked to dominate in large stretches, they always had a guy in front of the net to bury rebounds were a very fast team. Defensively their guys weren't afraid to use their bodies to block shots, they kept Point's shots to the outside and protected their goaltender, overall they looked like the better team.

When I saw them v. Utica they didn't look especially fast, but man-oh-man did they take care of their own end. Really disciplined and well-coached. A pleasure to watch.
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

When I saw them v. Utica they didn't look especially fast, but man-oh-man did they take care of their own end. Really disciplined and well-coached. A pleasure to watch.
yes in the small amount I watched that was evident as well.
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

Watching online it looked like they played great D-zone when they had the lead. If they lost the lead they turned the great D-zone into great offense, would regain the lead and focus back on D. I was impressed with their ability to really push on offense when needed and how great they were at shutting things down in the D-zone.

They always looked in control of the game.
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

I gotta stop taking vacations I miss it all.......sounds like it was a great game and Trinity just seemed to good to be beat, I did see a few periods vs Adrian and they looked fassssst,can anybody tel me how the overall game went?? did any team dominate??

You need to stop allowing your wife to dictate when you take vacations ... LOL
 
Re: Congratulations Trinity!

You are either A. Not married or B. are married and the LOL was to acknowledge how ridiculous a statement that was!:D
its more like the **** school schedule,next yr its the Atlantis and maybe Cuba but only after I check the **** school schedule:eek:
 
Back
Top