What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Colgate 2025-26

I am not sure he had a chance. The Gate rider had him hoist up with a stick between the legs like a wheelbarrow. That was pure momentum, he didn't have any steering left. At that point he was just a curling stone.

I don't believe the Gate defender set it up nullify a potential goal. (1) Nobody thinks that far in advance and (2) he just saw a guy bearing down on his goalie and the reptile brain said "crush, kill, destroy." That's just good in the paint hockey.

HE HAS TO STOP, I understand he didn’t have anywhere to go if he wanted to be in the play but once you enter the blue paint the rule is clear. The offending player has to stop and do anything to not hit the goalie. Period, stop, end of sentence
 
If an attacking player enters the goal crease

and, by his or her actions, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to defend his or

her goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

If an attacking player has been pushed, shoved, or fouled by a defending

player and causes contact with the goalkeeper, such contact will not be

deemed contact initiated by the attacking player for purposes of this rule,

provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such

contact.


This is the rule book. Even if pushed, he needed to try to avoid contact. There was absolutely no attempt to avoid contact. So no way this should have counted

Sorry about the formatting, I just copied it from the rule book and posted without editing so no one could claim I altered it
 
I always thought Gate benefitted more from teams playing against Cornell first. Cornell is normally more physical, I think Gate was actually the more physical team this weekend !

If an attacking player enters the goal crease

and, by his or her actions, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to defend his or

her goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

If an attacking player has been pushed, shoved, or fouled by a defending

player and causes contact with the goalkeeper, such contact will not be

deemed contact initiated by the attacking player for purposes of this rule,

provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such

contact.


This is the rule book. Even if pushed, he needed to try to avoid contact. There was absolutely no attempt to avoid contact. So no way this should have counted

Sorry about the formatting, I just copied it from the rule book and posted without editing so no one could claim I altered it
Good job Red, puts more clarity in it. Thanks !
 
If we could put together more games like last weekend we'd be a very good team and a tough out ! Keep it up boys !
 
Back
Top