What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Chocolate Chip Cookies

Chocolate Chip Cookies

  • Total voters
    30
Re: Chocolate Chip Cookies

Greyeagle said:
Yes.......but with none of those dam nuts.
Click to expand...

I like nuts, but I agree that they don't belong in CCCs.


BTW, where is the option for Chocolate Chocolate Chip Cookies? That is where the cookies themselves are chocolate.
 
Re: Chocolate Chip Cookies

Bakunin said:
He doesn't understand that joke because he wasn't a fan of the team long enough the first time around. :p
Click to expand...

This is true (about the being a fan long enough). But I have learned the history of the team (and am still learning). And 23 is still < 39.
 
Re: Chocolate Chip Cookies

Brenthoven said:
This is true (about the being a fan long enough). But I have learned the history of the team (and am still learning). And 23 is still < 39.
Click to expand...
Learning the history and actually suffering through it are very different things. You simply can't appreciate a title as much if you don't suffer through a lot of failure beforehand. To put it another way, if MNS ever gets any, he'll appreciate the experience on a far deeper level than the rest of us did when it was our first time, simply because he's gone far longer and failed far more than we ever did.
 
Re: Chocolate Chip Cookies

Bakunin said:
Learning the history and actually suffering through it are very different things. You simply can't appreciate a title as much if you don't suffer through a lot of failure beforehand. To put it another way, if MNS ever gets any, he'll appreciate the experience on a far deeper level than the rest of us did when it was our first time, simply because he's gone far longer and failed far more than we ever did.
Click to expand...

This is going to be my new sig!
 
Bakunin said:
Learning the history and actually suffering through it are very different things. You simply can't appreciate a title as much if you don't suffer through a lot of failure beforehand. To put it another way, if MNS ever gets any, he'll appreciate the experience on a far deeper level than the rest of us did when it was our first time, simply because he's gone far longer and failed far more than we ever did.
Click to expand...
So when someday the Vikings actually wi...ehhh..nevermind.:o
 
Re: Chocolate Chip Cookies

Bakunin said:
Learning the history and actually suffering through it are very different things. You simply can't appreciate a title as much if you don't suffer through a lot of failure beforehand. To put it another way, if MNS ever gets any, he'll appreciate the experience on a far deeper level than the rest of us did when it was our first time, simply because he's gone far longer and failed far more than we ever did.
Click to expand...

I'm a Bills fan. I've got the suffering part down, and that suffering is probably worth 2-3 teams' pain and agony. ;)
 
Re: Chocolate Chip Cookies

Brenthoven said:
I'm a Bills fan. I've got the suffering part down, and that suffering is probably worth 2-3 teams' pain and agony. ;)
Click to expand...
I call your bet as a Vikings follower (one that has turned numb to their failings in the past several years simply because it's just far too predictable). :p
 
Re: Chocolate Chip Cookies

Brenthoven said:
Four in a row.
Click to expand...
Were they favored in any of them?

I know MN was heavily favored at home against Atlanta in the NFC title game (the 1 loss regular season).

I also know that if MN ever makes it back to the SB, they'll find a way to lose in the most painful way imaginable.

Push a kick wide right? **** that, they'll do 12 in the huddle after a timeout and get pushed out of FG range by penalty, then run a stupid play and fail miserably. Only instead of it going to OT after that, the failing play will result in a turnover run back for a TD.

How do I know this will happen? Because it's the Vikings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top