What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

CC vs. UAA

Re: CC vs. UAA

I hope you are right. I hope CC plays like a bunch of individuals and not as a team. :rolleyes:


The only thing I can figure which DOES seem accurate is that when they're playing well UAA's trap is as good as anyone's at taking away/disrupting transition, which does make the game about 1 on 1 battles. I suspect this is why teams which rely heavily on transition for their offense (CC SCSU DU MN) struggle against UAA. Most of the time, Anchorage makes a team work the entire 200 feet and plays very hard in the individual battles.

UAA fans would probably have to confirm this, but I'm thinking UAA is far better than their record indicates--I was impressed with their Saturday night performance at CSWA and they looked very strong against DU on television.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

When UAA plays well, I agree Joe. When they're on their game they can play with and beat the top teams in the country. However, they also seem to lay an egg quite a few times each season as well. North Dakota, Denver, and CC have all seen what UAA can do when they're on. However, this is also the same team that's been smoked by Minnesota (4-1, 5-1) and Mankato (8-2). Those are decent teams, but not exactly world beaters.

This weekend doesn't look "epic" to me. I think the story will be more about which teams show up. If it's the team that lost 4-0 to the Badgers for CC and the one that beat Denver 7-3 for UAA, then this will be the week CC loses a chance at home ice. If it's the team that jumped all over Wisconsin Saturday and the UAA team that lost to Robert Morris (yeah, they beat Miami twice - they still aren't very good), then CC should roll.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

The only thing I can figure which DOES seem accurate is that when they're playing well UAA's trap is as good as anyone's at taking away/disrupting transition, which does make the game about 1 on 1 battles. I suspect this is why teams which rely heavily on transition for their offense (CC SCSU DU MN) struggle against UAA. Most of the time, Anchorage makes a team work the entire 200 feet and plays very hard in the individual battles.

UAA fans would probably have to confirm this, but I'm thinking UAA is far better than their record indicates--I was impressed with their Saturday night performance at CSWA and they looked very strong against DU on television.

Sometimes I think they are better than their record, and other times not. They sure had an impressive two weeks on the road though. I am ready for some hockey, seems like forever since I attended a game at the Sully!
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

This weekends battle against AA Will be Epic... I think the tigers will walk away with at least 2 points but I am leaning twoards 3... AA defensive style grinds anybody game to make then almost play on pure player ability.


Good luck, it will be a good series to see on TV..

Also Tig, How would one go about getting a meal ticket?


Esox

These 50 tickets go very fast, and may be all gone by now. Send me an e-mail to pikespeak99@msn.com and I will give you a name and phone number of the person who sells them. Thank you for being a tiger fan! Go Tigers!!
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

If UAA can clog the neutral zone like they did against denver they will be in both games, they just have to get some scoring.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

UAA fans would probably have to confirm this, but I'm thinking UAA is far better than their record indicates--I was impressed with their Saturday night performance at CSWA and they looked very strong against DU on television.

I believe that UAA is a capable team and we all know when they decide to show up they can compete with anyone. Our goaltending isn't going to steal many games, we need the D to show up and play. I am hoping that the guys are getting used to their linemates and coach leaves them alone to develop some chemistry. Two solid weekends, with effort and results is encouraging to me. Let's see if we show up in the 1st home series of the new year.

How is CC's goaltending? Does your Blueliners play a physical game? I don't know much about this years "Black Bears".
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

I believe that UAA is a capable team and we all know when they decide to show up they can compete with anyone. Our goaltending isn't going to steal many games, we need the D to show up and play. I am hoping that the guys are getting used to their linemates and coach leaves them alone to develop some chemistry. Two solid weekends, with effort and results is encouraging to me. Let's see if we show up in the 1st home series of the new year.

How is CC's goaltending? Does your Blueliners play a physical game? I don't know much about this years "Black Bears".

A lot of pucks have ended in the back of the net with Joe Howe in goal of late. Don't know if any other CC fans are concerned, but I am. I have seen Joe Howe for every home game and some games on the road and he was playing better early in the season compared to now. Sure it is not all his fault and maybe not even half his fault, but shots he stopped early in the season are not being stopped now.

CC's blueliners are more physical than years past. Most stand around 6-2, but a talented freshman named Doug Leaverton stands 6-4.

Go Tigers!!
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

How is CC's goaltending? Does your Blueliners play a physical game? I don't know much about this years "Black Bears".

Joe Howe has been very good in net for CC. He hasn't had the kind of freshman year that Bachman had, but a 2.69 gaa and .911 save percentage is more than I would have hoped for out of a freshman goalie. CC's defense isn't overly physical. Kris Fredheim has been one of my favorites since his sophomore year - he's the kind of defenseman you don't notice because he doesn't get out of position or make mistakes. This year he's really picked up his physical play and his puck skills, but both are done only when it's needed. Nate Prosser and Ryan Lowery are the other upperclassmen who have been steady on the blueline for 3+ years. All three will hit, but they're not overly physicaly. Gabe Guentzel got plenty of ice time as a freshman defenseman last year, and is the one most likely to jump into the offense (and make a mistake also, in my opinion). CC has been relying on those 4 for the big minutes and plays them in key situations.
After those 4 they have some guys who are getting their first real experience in college hockey. Doug Leaverton and Joe Marciano are both freshmen who have played most of the games, although they both seem to get limited minutes. Both seem to play a pretty simple game when they're out there - not looking for the big hit or the chance to jump up for a goal. Freshman Mike Boivin has played in about half the games so far. He clearly has some offensive skill, but in my opinion could use a bit of work on the defensive end.
At forward CC has usually had an identifiable star in the recent past - Chad Rau, Marty Sertich, Brett Sterling, Peter Sejna, Brian Swanson, etc. This year's team doesn't have that obvious go-to guy. Bill Sweatt is the closest, but it really feels to me that this team almost has 4 second lines instead of obvious first, second, third and fourth lines. If you take out special teams goals, the goal scoring isn't all that different between the guys who have been on the top line and those on the other lines. Heck, Andrew Hamburg, a freshman, has only played in 11 of the team's 24 games and he's 3rd on the team in even strength goals with 5. I think he's going to be very hard for the coaches to sit for the next few games.

This team reminds me a bit of Bemidji State's team last season. When they have jump, are skating hard and are really moving then they're very good. Wisconsin didn't know what hit them 2 minutes into Saturday's game. When they are sitting back and look lazy, they flat out suck. I think a good barometer is Tim Hall. He's always skating hard (at least early in his shift, he seems to get stuck on long shifts too often). If he sticks out, then the rest of the team isn't skating hard and things don't look good for CC. If everyone is flying around like he is, then they're playing the game they need to in order to win.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

Thanks CC fans,for info on your team, it'll make watching your team that much more interesting. It looks like it could be a fun series to watch, we should have a little bit of confidence having beaten you guys down in the Springs a few months back. If all of our guys show and play together for 60 minutes, it will be an entertaining weekend.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

Gosh, I was hoping this would be the season that Colorado College could spare a couple points to give to UAA on their home ice.

But looking at the conference standings I just don't see a way where CC can afford to give up any, so it is imperative that the Tigers keep all four points this weekend. Maybe next season UAA, maybe next season.:D

Go Tigers!! Need four points!!
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

Gosh, I was hoping this would be the season that Colorado College could spare a couple points to give to UAA on their home ice.

But looking at the conference standings I just don't see a way where CC can afford to give up any, so it is imperative that the Tigers keep all four points this weekend. Maybe next season UAA, maybe next season.:D

Go Tigers!! Need four points!!

Since UAA didn't allow CC to take 4 points down in the Springs, I don't think they are going to roll over and give them to you this weekend either. Sorry to burst your bubble.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

Since UAA didn't allow CC to take 4 points down in the Springs, I don't think they are going to roll over and give them to you this weekend either. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Nah Suze, that was just a poke, bubble is still big and strong at least until about 11:30 pm mountain time Friday, 22 Jan 10.;)

Come on Tigers, we need four points!! Go CC!!
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

Go get'em Tigers!! I'll be watching on TV and cheering for you loud and clear!! Four big points up for grabs!!

Go CC!!
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

The only thing I can figure which DOES seem accurate is that when they're playing well UAA's trap is as good as anyone's at taking away/disrupting transition, which does make the game about 1 on 1 battles. I suspect this is why teams which rely heavily on transition for their offense (CC SCSU DU MN) struggle against UAA. Most of the time, Anchorage makes a team work the entire 200 feet and plays very hard in the individual battles.

UAA fans would probably have to confirm this, but I'm thinking UAA is far better than their record indicates--I was impressed with their Saturday night performance at CSWA and they looked very strong against DU on television.

The UAA trap gave Denver fits a few weeks ago especially on Friday night. UAA is big and blocked more shots then anyone else we've faced all year. I think with Howe being as shaky as he's been lately UAA has a legitimate chance for a sweep.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

The UAA trap gave Denver fits a few weeks ago especially on Friday night. UAA is big and blocked more shots then anyone else we've faced all year. I think with Howe being as shaky as he's been lately UAA has a legitimate chance for a sweep.

Very insightful post. :D
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

The UAA trap gave Denver fits a few weeks ago especially on Friday night. UAA is big and blocked more shots then anyone else we've faced all year. I think with Howe being as shaky as he's been lately UAA has a legitimate chance for a sweep.

I keep hearing about how big UAA is and how effective they are at slowing other teams down, so I became curious to see how they have done on NHL sized ice compared to how they've done on Olympic (including UW's mid-sized) ice.

They are 4-6 at home on Olympic ice. I didn't see much there other than a big win against Denver and some blowout losses.
On the road it's more consistent (although less applicable to this weekend's series, admitedly).
They are 1-5 on Olympic sheets plus UW's large ice surface. The losses have been by pretty large margins - 5-1, 4-1, 5-1, 6-2, 5-0, with their lone win at CC in OT by a 3-2 score.
On the road on NHL sheets is a different story altogether. They are 2-1-1, with impressive wins against an admitedly weak MTU team. Much more impressive was the way they played at DU, with a tie and a 1 goal loss.

Here's the important thing to take away from this post - I was bored during my lunch break. I don't really think it's very applicable to this weekend's games, so I hope no one puts too much emphasis on it.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

UAA is more than just their trap. They are turning into a very dangerous team. They may be the hardest working team in the WCHA this year - they move their feet, have a ton of heart and grit, they compete for every puck, blocking shots and they work their sticks into passing and shooting lanes better than any WCHA team I've seen this year. As a Denver fan, we were very fortunate to get three points out of that weekend - UAA deserved a better fate.

Additionally, UAA goaltending has improved recently under Olthuis, and that alone can keep them close in any game. They are also effective at countering on turnovers and making the most of limited offensive opportunities. They don't have the high-end offensive talent of other WCHA teams, but when they play their style of game, they are extremely hard to play against.

I would not want to play the Seawolves again, as Denver (as a classic finesse team) does not match up well with UAA.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

I keep hearing about how big UAA is and how effective they are at slowing other teams down, so I became curious to see how they have done on NHL sized ice compared to how they've done on Olympic (including UW's mid-sized) ice.

They are 4-6 at home on Olympic ice. I didn't see much there other than a big win against Denver and some blowout losses.

They also had a win against UND, and at the time I think the Sioux were ranked 3rd nationally.
 
Re: CC vs. UAA

At the end of the 2nd Period its CC 4 AA 0....

This is a really physical game so far... Quite a few penaltys on both sides. CC looks good, they are playing like they did last week in teh first period of the UW game.


Esox
 
Back
Top