Re: CC vs. UAA
The only thing I can figure which DOES seem accurate is that when they're playing well UAA's trap is as good as anyone's at taking away/disrupting transition, which does make the game about 1 on 1 battles. I suspect this is why teams which rely heavily on transition for their offense (CC SCSU DU MN) struggle against UAA. Most of the time, Anchorage makes a team work the entire 200 feet and plays very hard in the individual battles.
UAA fans would probably have to confirm this, but I'm thinking UAA is far better than their record indicates--I was impressed with their Saturday night performance at CSWA and they looked very strong against DU on television.
I hope you are right. I hope CC plays like a bunch of individuals and not as a team.![]()
The only thing I can figure which DOES seem accurate is that when they're playing well UAA's trap is as good as anyone's at taking away/disrupting transition, which does make the game about 1 on 1 battles. I suspect this is why teams which rely heavily on transition for their offense (CC SCSU DU MN) struggle against UAA. Most of the time, Anchorage makes a team work the entire 200 feet and plays very hard in the individual battles.
UAA fans would probably have to confirm this, but I'm thinking UAA is far better than their record indicates--I was impressed with their Saturday night performance at CSWA and they looked very strong against DU on television.