Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXIV: Both candidates are the same, but here's why yours is aw
Samantha Bee is a genius.
Samantha Bee is a genius.
He didn't know how to use the machine.
Remember, he doesn't know how to read.![]()
![]()
https://youtu.be/7LFkN7QGp2c
If everyone read Snopes the Republican party would cease to exist.
Ok, I will admit that my use of the phrase "executive order" was hastily written. If you go strictly by "executive orders" then as you point out Obama's numbers are at or below several recent Presidents.
Ok, I will admit that my use of the phrase "executive order" was hastily written. If you go strictly by "executive orders" then as you point out Obama's numbers are at or below several recent Presidents.
But that is part of the problem. All Presidents, including Obama, know that "executive orders" are counted. They have to be. They are numbered, and published. Presidents are very attuned to this, which is why you see Presidents like Obama use things like "executive memoranda" or "executive notices" which are not published, are not counted, but are simply fiats from the oval office that from now on this is how government contractors will work, and this is how we're going to handle a certain aspect of Obamacare, etc...
So, yes, from a purely "executive order" counting methodology, Obama's numbers are not any higher than anyone elses. But he has admitted that he has chosen to go it alone and issue memoranda and other directives when he can't get a divided Congress to act, and that is the Presidential activity that concerns me most of all, because I don't trust Presidents of either party. The fact he is using Executive memoranda or notices instead of Executive orders only makes it less transparent, and more troublesome, in my opinion.
You know, you can whine about this all you want but you're whining at the wrong thing. The Republicans are the ones who have decided not to Govern. If they'd do their ****ing jobs instead of investigating Hillary Clinton all the time this would be a non-issue.
Ok, so now I'm right, but it's justified???You know, you can whine about this all you want but you're whining at the wrong thing. The Republicans are the ones who have decided not to Govern. If they'd do their ****ing jobs instead of investigating Hillary Clinton all the time this would be a non-issue.
He didn't know how to use the machine.
Remember, he doesn't know how to read.![]()
![]()
https://youtu.be/7LFkN7QGp2c
How did Trump "strike a chord" with lower income whites? If he did they're idiots not racists.And Bill's commentary doesn't suggest a vote for Trump makes sense since he offers nothing of substance to those folks. The level of contortion coming from the, "Not a Trump guy" contingent is very entertaining but must be very painful for them.
btw if they - and lower income blacks - are worse off than before it's not because of Obama - it's because the GOP did everything they possibly could to get in his way. Is that really something that doesn't register?
And so it begins. http://www.syracuse.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/donald_trump_nevada_lawsuit.html
Something tells me eight people will be deciding the President...
A pretty good read from 538 about 538 to kill time until polls close and real results start coming in.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...of-outcomes-and-most-of-them-come-up-clinton/
Is Eric also illiterate?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It turns out misogyny might be hereditary <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ElectionDay?src=hash">#ElectionDay</a> <a href="https://t.co/Mo9lzsuu24">pic.twitter.com/Mo9lzsuu24</a></p>— (((John Erso))) (@blackbear93) <a href="https://twitter.com/blackbear93/status/796082212659724289">November 8, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Spectacularly awesome. Shopped?
That is very well put and backs up what I was saying about 538 the last few days. Nate isnt skewing things, he just has no way to account for things the polls cant tell him which makes things super volatile. Florida's large Latino turnout is a fact (we have seen the numbers) but since most of them were probably never polled by anyone (since they rarely voted previously) it is not something Nate can really add into his projections because they are just not accounted for in his data. In 4 years that will be different but for now he can only use the numbers he has.
Ok, so now I'm right, but it's justified???
Again, we can disagree about whether it's justified or not. Personally I think it's a road we are better off not traveling down, especially if there is a chance that someone like Donald Trump could become President.
Here is a link that may help. https://cei.org/10KC/Chapter-3
My primary criticism of Obama is expansion of use of Executive Orders to essentially dictate law.
You can thank the GOP in Congress for that. Their admitted primary focus has been to make him a one-term president since Day 1. They have done nothing except pout. In order to keep government moving, he's had to resort to EOs.