What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

Despite what Chris Hayes would have you think, there is zero parallel between this poison mushroom story and the skittles analogy.

There is a strong parallel in the overall idea: reducing humans to poisonous food.

But yes, the core of the analogy -- some of them are poison so would you risk eating them? -- is not the same as the Jewish mushrooms in which every one of them is poison.

Carrying the analogy out, though, and correcting it for the actual frequency involved -- we do this all the time. We let babies grow up even though some percentage of them will grow up to be murderers. Women, against all reasonable calculation of expected value, go out with men even though a vastly higher percentage of those men will wind up beating, raping, or killing them.

Yes, life is dangerous. Yes, some Syrian immigrants will be radicalized and some will even commit criminal or terrorist acts. But so will white people born here -- should we deport them? And the vast majority of Syrian refugees are huddled masses yearning to breath free, the main ingredient in America.
 
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

No he stayed away from deporting them on trains...I believe that is what Drumpf Airlines is for ;)

Instead of sending them back, maybe once they were put on the trains, they could be taken to some other place instead. A lovely little camp, or something........................
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

Despite what Chris Hayes would have you think, there is zero parallel between this poison mushroom story and the skittles analogy.

You realize Chris Hayes isnt the one who came up with the parallel right?

And while I respect your opinion I am going to say you are wrong and just leave it at that. I know you wont agree so I feel like going further than that wont do us any good and will only inflame things.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

Instead of sending them back, maybe once they were put on the trains, they could be taken to some other place instead. A lovely little camp, or something........................

Hey America would never do that...I mean unless they are Japanese but come on they were asking for it :p
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

Who had 6 days in the birther pool?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog...medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark

Today Trump didn't quite recant his recantation of birtherism. But in practice he did. When asked why he said President Obama was born in the United States he said this.

"Well, I just wanted to get on with, you know, we want to get on with the campaign. And a lot of people were asking me questions. And you know, we want to talk about jobs, we want to talk about the military. We want to talk about ISIS and how to get rid of ISIS. We want to really talk about bringing jobs back to this area because you've been decimated. So we really want to get just back onto the subject of jobs, military, taking care of our vets, et cetera."

So he doesn't say he believes it, just that he wanted people to stop asking him about his crazy crap.
 
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

I am sure he will tell us Hillary recanted first ;)

In other news: Drumpf May Not Be Beholden to Wall Street But He Sure Is In Bed With Outside Interests In Other Countries

"KURT EICHENWALD: It’s huge.

I mean, it basically traces into virtually every major non-European area of the world. And when you have someone who has conflicts of interest in India and Azerbaijan, in Russia, in China, in Turkey, in — you know, the list just keeps going on and on and on — in the Philippines.

I mean, there was a point where I just had to stop, because I couldn’t keep — you know, I only had 5,000 words to tell this story, and the number of conflicts would go on — fill an a entire issue of “Newsweek.”

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, what’s an example of a conflict? Because, among other things, you say Donald Drumpf is not a builder. You call him a licenser.

What does that mean?

KURT EICHENWALD: Well, for the last decade or so, Donald Drumpf hasn’t been building anything. He’s been on “The Apprentice” and he’s been selling his name, sort of like Hilton Hotels sells its name.

And so he’s been basically selling his name out to people who will pay him, without, apparently, a lot of due diligence into who these people are. I mean, a great example is, he has a deal right now with a fellow in Azerbaijan whose father is a major government official who has been identified by American intelligence as money laundering for the Iranian military.

So, you have now Donald Drumpf, if he’s president of the United States, he’s got conflicts in Azerbaijan, and he is somebody who his business partner’s father is linked to some pretty bad things.

What does he do? What’s his interest? How does he approach it?"
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

"We like Donald Trump, cause he tells it like it is".
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

"We like Donald Trump, cause he tells it like it is".

Well he does when people dont rip him for it...when he goes too far he is "just being sarcastic" or "not being serious" or some such nonsense :D
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

Today Trump didn't quite recant his recantation of birtherism. But in practice he did. When asked why he said President Obama was born in the United States he said this.

"Well, I just wanted to get on with, you know, we want to get on with the campaign. And a lot of people were asking me questions. And you know, we want to talk about jobs, we want to talk about the military. We want to talk about ISIS and how to get rid of ISIS. We want to really talk about bringing jobs back to this area because you've been decimated. So we really want to get just back onto the subject of jobs, military, taking care of our vets, et cetera."

So, of course, the reporter asked the logical follow-up: "Mr. Trump, we want to discuss those issues, too, but millions of Americans also want to know why you held and promoted a dishonest claim for so many years, simply for political gain."

The reporter asked that question, right?....Of course not, yet another failure of American journalism.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

There is a strong parallel in the overall idea: reducing humans to poisonous food.



But yes, the core of the analogy -- some of them are poison so would you risk eating them? -- is not the same as the Jewish mushrooms in which every one of them is poison.

Carrying the analogy out, though, and correcting it for the actual frequency involved -- we do this all the time. We let babies grow up even though some percentage of them will grow up to be murderers. Women, against all reasonable calculation of expected value, go out with men even though a vastly higher percentage of those men will wind up beating, raping, or killing them.

Yes, life is dangerous. Yes, some Syrian immigrants will be radicalized and some will even commit criminal or terrorist acts. But so will white people born here -- should we deport them? And the vast majority of Syrian refugees are huddled masses yearning to breath free, the main ingredient in America.

Ok, but we're not analyzing Dostoyevsky here, it's a bowl of skittles. God forbid anyone gets referred to as a bad egg.

Right, all Jews are poison mushrooms. 3/1000 skittles are bad. My bet is probably the green ones.

I don't really accept the vox analogy. It has other faults, but mainly it is based on past history as an indicator of future success. And we don't really have any history of refugee immigration from an active civil war zone where we are an active and major player, especially while that war is still going on. Nor do we have experience in the past of large scale immigration from countries containing active terrorist organizations like AQ and ISIS that are currently trying to foment terrorism here. We've not settled Palestinians have we? We might look to Europe and see how they've fared as at least an indicator if there's trouble brewing.

Of course life is dangerous, the fact of it doesn't preclude one from attempting to mitigate risks where one can. Your babies argument I dismiss as silly -- it presents no alternative except self-extinction. And certainly you're not suggesting women shouldn't be selective, or at the least, aren't free to take whatever precautions they may deem fit to provide for their own safety?

Funny about the last as our friend Slap Shot and I were discussing this (in what has now become the electricity thread) and he provided a NY Times article and another one that had a similar headline to this Newsweek one which all base themselves on a New America Think Tank chart that used to say that righty whitey killed 48 vs. jihadists only 26 over the last several years. Yesterday I linked to it and it said jihadists now had 94 and whitey was still mired at 48, presumably making jihadist now the more deadly threat. Although I can't say I totally buy the death toll as the only, or even best measure of what the threat is either way. A lot of these nut jobs strike out on their attempts as we've seen. Anyway, deport them? No. Arrest? Yes. I imagine we're efforting it.

Incidentally, New America is a liberal think tank headed by Mrs. Clinton's former assistant secretary and I guess it is working out well as it has apparently been shaping opinions in a lot of MSM over the last year or two. At least I keep running into this stat in it. What's funny to me is that since I linked to it yesterday they demolished the chart and redirected the page, which makes me suspicious one of you guys actually work there. :-)

I completely agree with your last sentence.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

There is a strong parallel in the overall idea: reducing humans to poisonous food.

But yes, the core of the analogy -- some of them are poison so would you risk eating them? -- is not the same as the Jewish mushrooms in which every one of them is poison.

Carrying the analogy out, though, and correcting it for the actual frequency involved -- we do this all the time. We let babies grow up even though some percentage of them will grow up to be murderers. Women, against all reasonable calculation of expected value, go out with men even though a vastly higher percentage of those men will wind up beating, raping, or killing them.

Yes, life is dangerous. Yes, some Syrian immigrants will be radicalized and some will even commit criminal or terrorist acts. But so will white people born here -- should we deport them? And the vast majority of Syrian refugees are huddled masses yearning to breath free, the main ingredient in America.

Very well said.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

Early morning platitude drivel alert:

The world is becoming a blended society, and the momentum will not slow; nor should it. It is our best hope for peace, I think, is that our children become increasingly international, working abroad or for companies that have substantial international interests, marrying persons who either have significant international ties or are citizens of other countries, creating families with mixed international and/or religious heritage, and forming close friendships through work and play with other young people from Korea, India, Quatar, Turkey and Jordan, and so forth . And this blending is not just happening in our cites, as it has for hundreds of years; it is happening in the global marketplace. There is a difference between expecting Poles, Irish, and Lebanese to come to this country and assimilate here, learning OUR language and OUR traditions, and getting to know them in their own homes and marketplaces, where we learn what their business, religious, and entertainment culture is all about. This is our hope, IMO, because it is harder to hate and fear a people you understand and have formed important relationships with. Isolationism, on the other hand, estranges.

Terrorism is more of a problem a blended world society, since there will be more bad guys among us and since conflicts are not just localized to other, usually developing areas of the world where we have become involved in order to fuel our cars and stock our supermarkets. So there will be those who will try to capitalize on the fear of these bad guys from other tribes order to grab power. Trump is one of these people. His view of our role as a nation is an extension of his own view as a person: it is all about what is good for me. It appeals to a simplistic, tribalistic and anachronistic way of thinking that will certainly make us less secure, not more. And he is getting support because we are hard wired and have not yet fully emerged from the cave.
 
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVIII: I'm OK, You're Deplorable

There's the part where he has no idea where oil actually is:
The Iraqis he said “have among the largest oil reserves in the world, in the entire world”. Iraq is estimated to have the fifth biggest reserves, but the bulk of that oil is not under Isis’s control.

He thinks Iraq overran Saudi Arabia. He missed that whole Bush/war thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top