How will you fare in year 10?
No plan survives contact with the enemy.
In other words, Congre$$ will revise the 2018 Law that it will be unrecognizable from what will be passed in the next few days.
I'll be 73. That much is certain.
How will you fare in year 10?
The controversy intensified further when Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) appeared on ABC News’ “This Week” yesterday and George Stephanopoulos asked about the specific provision benefiting those with real estate income through LLCs. When the host asked if Republicans are prepared to undo this, Cornyn dodged. It led to this exchange:
STEPHANOPOULOS: [This provision] apparently was added at the last minute. Why was that done? Why was it necessary to include that provision?
CORNYN: Well, we were working very hard. It was a very intense process. As I said, the Democrats refused to participate. And what we’ve tried to do is cobble together the votes we needed to get this bill passed.
No plan survives contact with the enemy.
In other words, Congre$$ will revise the 2018 Law that it will be unrecognizable from what will be passed in the next few days.
I'll be 73. That much is certain.
I can think of about a thousand different ways to do this tax cut that would have been acceptable to me.
I'm guessing that when Obamacare was implemented you weren't so quick to dismiss its impact on the future. As long as you get your couple grand while you're young enough to enjoy it...
I had/have insurance through my employer. I thought ACA was an unwarranted federal overreach that, sure as shootin', the Republicans would find a way to foul it up like they did with No Child Left Behind and Common Core. They did.
It should have stayed at the State level.
FTFY, Joe.
Hmmmm.. Remember the Deep State?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/feat...reaucrats-are-chipping-away-at-trump-s-agenda
It's not a party, it's the bureaucrats who have an entrenched interest in Empire Building..
Hmmmm.. Remember the Deep State?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/feat...reaucrats-are-chipping-away-at-trump-s-agenda
It's not a party, it's the bureaucrats who have an entrenched interest in Empire Building..
I had/have insurance through my employer. I thought ACA was an unwarranted federal overreach that, sure as shootin', the Feds would find a way to foul it up like they did with No Child Left Behind and Common Core. They did.
It should have stayed at the State level.
Because poor people in Mississippi and Kentucky deserve to be farked over, right?
To be honest it feels like they think we're too stupid to understand what's in the bill so they'll get away with it.
Yep, extremely disrespectful and brazen. The good news is, support for it is down another 10 points so it will def be an anchor on the campaign trail this summer.
Sweet. U of Minnesota emailed season ticket holders today to remind us that our current required “donation” is currently 80% deductible but will not be at all under the new tax plan. They are letting you donate before 12/31 if you want to get the deduction.
I’ll pass.
The normal and proper aim of the corporate community is to make money for its managers and for the owners of business. All the better if its members also contribute to the general prosperity. However, business acts on the prevailing business philosophy, which claims that corporate self-interest eventually produces the general interest. This comfortable belief rests on misinterpretation of the theory of market rationality proposed by Adam Smith.
Smith would have found the market primitivism of the current day unrecognizable. He saw the necessity for public intervention to create or sustain the public interest, and took for granted the existence of a government responsible to the community as a whole, providing the structure within which the economy functions.
Classical political thought says that the purpose of government is to do justice for its citizens. Part of this obligation is to foster conditions in which wealth is produced. The obligation is not met by substituting the wealth-producer for the government.
Business looks after the interests of businessmen and corporation stockholders. Stark and selfish self-interest obviously is not what motivates most American businessmen and -women, but it is the doctrine of the contemporary corporation and of the modern American business school.
It does not automatically serve the general interest, as any 18th century rationalist or any 21st century realist would acknowledge.
-- William Pfaff
I hope so.
It's pretty easy to distract the public from stuff like this. One of the ways they get away with it is the media is primed to think (or to act as if they think) that people don't care about / can't understand policy and finance. That's why we wind up with a 24/7 inundation of sports and entertainment instead of news. Of course, it also serves the interests of the ruling class to put the people to sleep.
The Dems need to pound this every day from now til November. We are in a class war; our side just isn't fighting.
Yep, extremely disrespectful and brazen. The good news is, support for it is down another 10 points so it will def be an anchor on the campaign trail this summer.