What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

I'm wondering if those were people betting on this being a flash crash that would immediately corrected by the market. Problem is, that's a suckers bet. Mainly because a lot of the people who are playing volatility markets don't really understand the underlying product.

I understand the idea behind shorting it despite the spike. The economy hasn't shown any signs of weakness. Not until Friday and today. And those are just the markets, not the economy. So today's market movements didn't make sense in a lot of ways. VIX has a habit of overreacting (at a lack of a better word). What I mean is that VIX doesn't move... until it does and when it does it tends to be fairly dramatic and short-lived. If there was no reason for VIX to spike, get in and short it with the expectation you'll see it come back to earth in a short amount of time.

I'm reading this post back to myself and I'm realizing it's kind of all over the place. Long story short, trying to outsmart the market, even when you are smart is a risky move. Know what you're getting into bed with and don't think you can outsmart the whales. They're really sharks.

don't worry about it. you are in good company.

The economy is mostly told with lagging indicators - very few are leading from my research. For example, even months before the Oct 29 crash, everything in the economy was humming right along according to the data at the time. The markets are more forward "thinking", which is why predicting them is impossible. For a while, the Trump tax cuts led way to an optimistic outlook...companies would add to their bottom line! Now that this sentiment has passed us by, its something else to fixate on. Selloffs are a natural course for markets, because fundamentals always change. But we can't know why large groups sell - is it because equity is overpriced, or is it because bond yields are becoming more attractive? I do not know the answer to that.

The vix is a bit misunderstood. One of my old co workers traded xiv for a while, and even had a business set up around it ( he quit due to problems with the other co founder). So I understand their primary thesis which was simply to short volatility when the VIX exceeded certain thresholds. VIX itself is simply a ratio of puts /calls - the more puts being purchased the more "fearful" the market was. More important than this ratio is how the term structure is laid out. If it was in backwardation, you should not be short vol (and out of XIV)- it is in contango you should be long xiv. backwardation tells you that the closer vxx futures are selling for more, this is the market panic. Want to see it? Log onto your broker, search for "SPY" and check out the option chain for the close to the money calls and puts. (I didn't check out of the money) The spreads between the bids and asks for calls and puts are as wide as the Mississippi. More people are loading up on puts, and the prices of calls are way down. This is the essence of vix, in my still limited experience. vix is like a second derivative of sorts, so it can't stay high for long.

at the end of the day, its hard, if not impossible to try to predict anything, like you said. I personally like understanding whats going on so that when these weird events happen, one can have a basis for why its happening. That said, there is certainly something iffy with xiv/svxy and will be curious to see what comes out of it.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-05/credit-suisse-tumbles-fears-massive-xiv-loss

Oh man, Credit Suisse is in for some serious pain if they hadn't gotten out in time. Half a year's profits may have been completely wiped out by this



don't worry about it. you are in good company.

The economy is mostly told with lagging indicators - very few are leading from my research. For example, even months before the Oct 29 crash, everything in the economy was humming right along according to the data at the time. The markets are more forward "thinking", which is why predicting them is impossible. For a while, the Trump tax cuts led way to an optimistic outlook...companies would add to their bottom line! Now that this sentiment has passed us by, its something else to fixate on. Selloffs are a natural course for markets, because fundamentals always change. But we can't know why large groups sell - is it because equity is overpriced, or is it because bond yields are becoming more attractive? I do not know the answer to that.

The vix is a bit misunderstood. One of my old co workers traded xiv for a while, and even had a business set up around it ( he quit due to problems with the other co founder). So I understand their primary thesis which was simply to short volatility when the VIX exceeded certain thresholds. VIX itself is simply a ratio of puts /calls - the more puts being purchased the more "fearful" the market was. More important than this ratio is how the term structure is laid out. If it was in backwardation, you should not be short vol (and out of XIV)- it is in contango you should be long xiv. backwardation tells you that the closer vxx futures are selling for more, this is the market panic. Want to see it? Log onto your broker, search for "SPY" and check out the option chain for the close to the money calls and puts. (I didn't check out of the money) The spreads between the bids and asks for calls and puts are as wide as the Mississippi. More people are loading up on puts, and the prices of calls are way down. This is the essence of vix, in my still limited experience. vix is like a second derivative of sorts, so it can't stay high for long.

at the end of the day, its hard, if not impossible to try to predict anything, like you said. I personally like understanding whats going on so that when these weird events happen, one can have a basis for why its happening. That said, there is certainly something iffy with xiv/svxy and will be curious to see what comes out of it.

Holy crap. You weren't kidding.
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/SPY/options?ltr=1&straddle=false
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/SPY/options?ltr=1&straddle=true
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

Yup, 500 million. A little karma for underwriting this garbage.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

And now the Dow futures are off by 1,000+

Tomorrow is going to be a wild ride.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

Brokerage houses have two sets of books, or accounts, if you will. They have one set of accounts which are entirely setup for their clients. Those trade based upon agreements with the clients - either directed by an account/investment manager, or only triggered by instructions put forth by the client. Even those trades directed by an agent of the brokerage can have limits set by account contract to keep them from being churned to death, ergo fees eating all the clients' profits. The other set of books are for accounts strictly held by brokerage firms for their own benefit. When it comes to stocks and bonds, they can (mostly) buy and sell as often as they want. There are limits, but there are easy ways to skirt most of the those limits, too.

With regards to limiting the purchases/sales of assets, mutual funds have 30-day limits in place as under-educated investors were churning their own 401k accounts. Now it's setup so that if you purchase on Day X, and sell prior to X+30, then the mutual fund company can place a purchase-block on your account, keeping you from moving your money into that specific investment again for a set period of time (I forget the period).
Also interesting to note that it is illegal for the brokerage houses to take advantage of client instructions to make decisions about their own trades first. That is, if a bunch of clients are issuing "Sell Amazon" instructions, they can't first go sell off their own Amazon shares and then get around to selling the clients' shares after their own selling has depressed the price.

However, it's really darn hard to catch them doing this, and there's a pretty strong assumption that it happens quite a lot. A friend of ours from CERN had actually worked for Goldman before going back into physics, and he was in talks with some of the European regulators about using some of the software techniques for triggering* recordings of particle collision events in the LHC for looking for and recording suspicious trading patterns. I'm not sure anything ever came of that, though.

*In particle colliders, there are so many collisions and resulting particles showering off of them that you can't possibly record all the data. You have to have software that looks at the raw data stream in near real time (~800 MHz, if I recall correctly) to decide if a set of data "looks interesting" - a trigger. The interesting few nanoseconds of data are recorded, and the rest disappears into the aether. Even so, the data that they do record annually would just about fit on a stack of CDs...that would reach the moon. Without jewel cases. Even the highest frequency trading is in the 10 MHz range, 2 orders of magnitude slower than the CERN triggers, so technologically, it would be child's play for them.
 
Are you selling low?

No. I normally don't look at my account but was curious. I earned a 7% return last year, but have lost 8% since Friday, and early indicators are the DJIA will open down a thousand tomorrow. Fortunately only 27% of my account is in the US stock market. It hurts though. Seeing Forbes estimate Jeff Bezos lost $2.2 billion today doesn't make me feel any better.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

In just not even checking. Don’t want to panic. Not much I can do.
Maybe I should try to pick up a few things low
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

If we’re off another thousand today, I’ll be in a buying mood. Anything below around 24,000 and we’re in full correction mode.

ETA: while you were sleeping, the VIX hit 50.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/06/key-measure-of-market-volatility--the-vix--jumps-above-50-highest-level-since-aug-2015.html

In context:
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/ETF%20in%20context.jpg

That’s the highest since 2015 and the largest single day spike ever. Be careful reading too much into it though. As was discussed earlier, there’s some shenanigans going on in the volatility markets right now, but this isn’t going to help things.

If it cracks 52, it’s the highest since the Great Recession. Buckle up buttercup.

ETA: this was an interesting article. I’m not sure if this is the kind of person who will buy tactical butt wipes but the logic seems to check out.

https://www.diyinvesting.org/risk/liquidation-xiv-short-volatility-etn-stock-market-crash
 
Last edited:
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

If I had money I'd probably be a buyer. If I had a real broker who got me out and in on time I would have made a lot of money. Instead, I'll dollar cost average cause that's what I'm stuck with. Wheeeeeee.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

If you had access to any of these, you -specifically- would be broke. You would chase the markets with your retirement and you would lose. Periodic investment or DCAing (as most of us know it) are saving you from yourself.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

If you had access to any of these, you -specifically- would be broke. You would chase the markets with your retirement and you would lose. Periodic investment or DCAing (as most of us know it) are saving you from yourself.

The good news is I was unaffected by yesterday. At least so far. That's how well diversified I am.


The steep declines in the stock markets in recent days have many investors nervous, but some local investment professionals said it is not time to panic.

They said the overheated markets were due for a reset of expectations. So while the markets have already shown more volatility in 2018 than all of last year, they said they still expect them to end the year higher than they started.

Lisa Erickson, senior vice president and head of the traditional investments group at U.S. Bank Wealth Management, said her bank’s message to clients on Monday was to stay the course and focus on long-term goals while monitoring the situation closely.

“We don’t see it has an immediate reason for concern,” Erickson said.

http://www.startribune.com/local-in...t-alarmed-by-steep-market-declines/472830133/
 
Last edited:
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

If I had money I'd probably be a buyer. If I had a real broker who got me out and in on time I would have made a lot of money. Instead, I'll dollar cost average cause that's what I'm stuck with. Wheeeeeee.

I would say its unreasonable to expect your broker ( or anyone for that matter) to reliably time the markets. Think of it this way, the best time to make money would be to perfectly time the tops, sell, and buy back at the bottoms. Of course in rising markets, the prevailing mindset is to buy more…not sell. Would a broker have much money if they faded strength , and reported to you that you missed the last 5% move in the S&P500? I do not think so. You’d fire them faster than Donald Trump fires whitehouse staff.

In the grocery store, you buy more of cheaper products, and less of the more expensive products. The stock market is the opposite where people want to buy more as things get more costly, and want to buy less as they become cheaper.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

I would say its unreasonable to expect your broker ( or anyone for that matter) to reliably time the markets. Think of it this way, the best time to make money would be to perfectly time the tops, sell, and buy back at the bottoms. Of course in rising markets, the prevailing mindset is to buy more…not sell. Would a broker have much money if they faded strength , and reported to you that you missed the last 5% move in the S&P500? I do not think so. You’d fire them faster than Donald Trump fires whitehouse staff.

In the grocery store, you buy more of cheaper products, and less of the more expensive products. The stock market is the opposite where people want to buy more as things get more costly, and want to buy less as they become cheaper.

"And no matter whether our clients make money, Duke and Duke collect their commissions."
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

Dammit. The market already looks to be smarter than the average bear. Instead of continuing to sell off because of the cluster Fark in XIV, the market is almost up.

I was really hoping for a big sell off again.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

Dammit. The market already looks to be smarter than the average bear. Instead of continuing to sell off because of the cluster Fark in XIV, the market is almost up.

I was really hoping for a big sell off again.

Yeah from what I hear they suspended trading of xiv and svxy.
 
Last edited:
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands

"And no matter whether our clients make money, Duke and Duke collect their commissions."

exactly. Its less than a zero sum game for most. The middle men always get their piece of the pie. always.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top