This video shows the play very well in slow motion.
https://twitter.com/BUHockeyStats/st...75546838147072
There was clear contact when the goalie moves to his left - his head bumps into Skoog. Skoog's left skate is *barely* in the crease and the contact is minimal. However, it did occur and it's clear on the video. To some other comments here, the in the crease component only comes into play if contact is made. Simply being in the crease, in and of itself, is not a violation.
However, all of the above is not relevant - the head contact occurred
after the puck was in the net. This is obvious on the slow-mo replay, which I have to assume the officials had in the booth. Even at full speed, it's relatively clear the puck was already in. Certainly not clear and obvious (or whatever the standard is) to overturn a call on the ice.
The only possible contact that occurred before the puck goes in is Skoog's leg/skate might've grazed the goalie, but it'd be the slightest of touches and absolutely not obvious on the video. Additionally, you can see the Lowell defender initiate contact with Skoog to push him back a bit toward the goalie.
There's absolutely zero rule-based explanation for overturning that.
If you need to spend 30 seconds
after you complete the review aligning your story with all four officials, that should be clear and obvious your call is wrong.