I would agree that Leaman and Bazin are the two best coaches in Hockey East. Slight edge to Leaman, whose teams are better offensively, IMO. Bazin's teams play great team defense, as was on display at WBA.
What bothers me about BU's coaching ... 5 shots on goal in the first period; 2 shots on goal in third period. TWO. In a home playoff game.
BU was outshot in almost every game this season. And sometimes that shots attempted were extreme. Some of that is down to coaching. I don't think there is a lack of talent.
I was pleased when Albie was hired, and getting the opportunity. I was excited that he brought in Paul Pearl, who was an experienced head coach at Holy Cross, and well respected throughout the hockey community.
BU is still recruiting well. The team defense has been better this year. Commesso and Duplessis both performed well in goal. But something is still missing.
I don't think it is fair to lay it all on Albie. But something is still amiss.
I don't think the home ice was a factor at all. These are all basically neutral site games. In fact, playing on the smaller sheet is a negative for how BU's roster is built. The smaller confines are ideal for larger, grinding teams like a Merrimack or UML.
Coaching is a an area to look at but I am not sure how you draw up taking shots on a erase board. Players have to step up and deliver too. There is no coach saying don't take shots. Their strategy (not sure what it was) was surely lacking.
The difference between BU of .500 last year and this year at 10-4-1 was because of goaltending. Last year they didnt have it - this year they do. Now they have to add to that and figure out how to generate more offense. Being outshot 90% of the games is not a long term winning strategy. I am with you - something is missing and I think its an identity thing.
What is BU hockey and what do they do well? Can anyone answer that?