What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Boston College Season Thread: PART II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

I know of a lot of the older Canadian players who now have real good jobs in Boston in the banking and financial fields. Some of these older players have also done great things in community.

Exhibit A, Ryan Sullivan....
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

Exhibit A, Ryan Sullivan....

Going back further to the Ron Anderson days, Tom Johnson and Rob Beck right out of college were doing big things in Boston's investment banking field. Even volunteer goalie coach Jim Healey has a job as a banker. Other former players are pharmaceutical sales reps, some own their own companies, etc...

This is the BC thread so I don't want to get off topic, but I have enjoyed going to Hockey East games for decades now because I enjoy good hockey. I'd rather go to one college hockey game than five NHL games. However, with the exception of BC, Michigan, Minnesota, there aren't many teams in college hockey who have a roster made up entirely of legitimate college aged players. If you made a rule that said players had to be 19 or younger when starting, the product on the ice would be a lot worse than it already is. It isn't as good as it was a decade ago even. As long as Merrimack players go to class, stay out of trouble and compete hard on the ice, I could care less if the entire team is made of western Canadian 20-24 year olds.
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

..... than Johnny Gaudreau will be for the HE championship his senior year
Quintessential BC post. Already assuming that the Eagles will be in the HE '14-'15 HE championship.:rolleyes:

ps. it seems only you and your mentor Nick have a hair across your $%^ about the age thing at MC. This dead horse has been beaten to a pulp. Just give it a rest already.
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

Quintessential BC post. Already assuming that the Eagles will be in the HE '14-'15 HE championship.:rolleyes:

Easy now, I think you took that way too literally. In any event, assuming BC will be in the Hockey East title game has been a pretty good bet over the last 10-15 years.
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

Easy now, I think you took that way too literally. In any event, assuming BC will be in the Hockey East title game has been a pretty good bet over the last 10-15 years.

Almost as good of a bet as Merrimack NOT making the HE tournament championship.
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

HD, curious to hear your thoughts on the recently departed from Moncton.

Great kid and player. Was injured and needed to shut it down and come home and get it fixed, which he has. Will be playing for another org next eyar, maybe Kitchner and will be an nhl pick when it is his year. Coach in Q also lied to the kid and didnt use as promissed, from day one. Good thing he got all of his money up front

Q sucks, American kids should boycot it. Which they pretty much do anyways. Bunch of political french guys who love to jam up Americans
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

Easy now, I think you took that way too literally. In any event, assuming BC will be in the Hockey East title game has been a pretty good bet over the last 10-15 years.
Agreed, and they will likely be a participant for the next 10-15...just busting chops.
10 finals in the last 15 years (since '97), 8 championships.
Last time not making at least the semi-finals was '04. Yes, looks like a pretty good chance they'll be there.:o
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

I raised this point on EA, so I'll mention it here. I think there should be a rule in place where kids like this, a 16 year old, can regain college eligibility in situations like this.
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

Last time not making at least the semi-finals was '04. Yes, looks like a pretty good chance they'll be there.:o

And they were the 1 seed that year. Stupid BU qualified on the last night of the season and took us down in 3 at Conte. I was so PO'ed I had to buy myself some new skates to calm down. :D
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

I wish it was mandatory for US kids to go the college route. Seen too many cases of over hyped 15-16 year olds who fizzled in Q
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

Quintessential BC post. Already assuming that the Eagles will be in the HE '14-'15 HE championship.:rolleyes:

ps. it seems only you and your mentor Nick have a hair across your $%^ about the age thing at MC. This dead horse has been beaten to a pulp. Just give it a rest already.

*yawn*

The date of the HE Championship. Better?
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

Q sucks, American kids should boycot it. Which they pretty much do anyways. Bunch of political french guys who love to jam up Americans

This should be an example for any American looking to go there. At 16 yeah you (your family/advisor/whatever) gets a quick buck but if it doesn't work out you've closed so many doors.
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

I wish it was mandatory for US kids to go the college route. Seen too many cases of over hyped 15-16 year olds who fizzled in Q

He is not over hyped. Big, strong and very good. Type of kid, like a Coyle, who will be a better pro then college player. Will have great options and be just fine.

Was surprised it didnt work out better as one place good to US kids is Moncton, think Yandle
new coach is a clown, an area clown at that

I have to disagree on the mandatory college route. They dont develop players and some kids dont like school. The NHL is not filled with rhode scholars

If you can burn the flag, you sure as heck can go major junior
 
Last edited:
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

I have to disagree on the mandatory college route. They dont develop players and some kids dont like school. The NHL is not filled with rhode scholars

If you can burn the flag, you sure as heck can go major junior

Don't think college should be the mandatory route at all, it's not for everyone regardless of desired profession.

I just don't think kids/parents/advisors should be making life altering decisions (one that closes a sh*t ton of doors) before the kid can even drive.
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

,I never said he was over hyped, but many others are. There was a kid a few years ago at a catholic school on North Shore who is in this year's Super 8 who was decen, but made foolish decision to go to Q after sophomore year. Has worked in factories, sporting good stores and now busses tables at a chain restaurant with no degree from even high school.

I'll stick with my original thought. American kids should play NCAA hockey.
 
Re: Boston College Season Thread: PART II

There are plenty of players who developed nicely by going the college route. Saying colleges don't develop players is completely unfair.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top