In between entertaining the munchkin and watching, did we ever get an explanation from officials on that no-goal for BC? Either they clearly missed it going in AFTER the whistle or the official thought he prevented Foster from defending the goal.
A goal will be allowed with an attacking player in the crease if an attacking player was in the crease but, in the opinion of the official, did not prevent the goalkeeper from defending the goal (for mister smarty pants hillbilly unh fan talking down to everyone that disagrees with him).
I'm don't think he kept Foster from defending his goal. And clearly it was in before the whistle. So I say they screwed it up.