What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Big Ten Hockey Conference

Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

JDUBBS1280 said:
We don't count shared titles either.
Click to expand...

Yes you do. Every single one of Minnesota's football championships were shared.

1934:
Alabama - #1 - Dunkel System, Houlgate System, Poling System, Williamson System

1935:
LSU - co#1 - Williamson System
Princeton - #1 - Dunkel System
SMU - #1 - Dickinson System, Houlgate System, Sagarin Ratings
TCU - co#1 - Williamson System

1936:
LSU - #1 - Sagarin Ratings, Williamson System
Pitt - #1 - Boand System, College Football Researchers Association, Houlgate System

1940:
Stanford - #1 - Billingsley Report, Helms Athletic Foundation, Poling System
Tennessee - #1 - Dunkel System, Williamson System

1941:
Alabama - #1 - Houlgate System
Texas - #1 - Berryman (QPRS), Williamson System

1960:
Iowa - #1 - Berryman (QPRS), Boand System, Litkenhous, Sagarin Ratings
Ole Miss - #1 - Billingsley Report, College Football Researchers Association, DeVold System, Dunkel System, Football Writers Association of America, National Championship Foundation, Williamson System
Missouri - #1 - Poling System
Washington - #1 - Helms Athletic Foundation
 
Fighting Sioux 23 said:
Yes you do. Every single one of Minnesota's football championships were shared.

1934:
Alabama - #1 - Dunkel System, Houlgate System, Poling System, Williamson System

1935:
LSU - co#1 - Williamson System
Princeton - #1 - Dunkel System
SMU - #1 - Dickinson System, Houlgate System, Sagarin Ratings
TCU - co#1 - Williamson System

1936:
LSU - #1 - Sagarin Ratings, Williamson System
Pitt - #1 - Boand System, College Football Researchers Association, Houlgate System

1940:
Stanford - #1 - Billingsley Report, Helms Athletic Foundation, Poling System
Tennessee - #1 - Dunkel System, Williamson System

1941:
Alabama - #1 - Houlgate System
Texas - #1 - Berryman (QPRS), Williamson System

1960:
Iowa - #1 - Berryman (QPRS), Boand System, Litkenhous, Sagarin Ratings
Ole Miss - #1 - Billingsley Report, College Football Researchers Association, DeVold System, Dunkel System, Football Writers Association of America, National Championship Foundation, Williamson System
Missouri - #1 - Poling System
Washington - #1 - Helms Athletic Foundation
Click to expand...

So, Minnesota is allowed to recognize those, but not the 1940 championship in hockey?

You proved yourself right on this point, but proved yourself wrong on the greater point.

Minnesota officially has 7 hockey national championships. Now we can move on to other discussions :)
 
Fighting Sioux 23 said:
Yes you do. Every single one of Minnesota's football championships were shared.

1934:
Alabama - #1 - Dunkel System, Houlgate System, Poling System, Williamson System

1935:
LSU - co#1 - Williamson System
Princeton - #1 - Dunkel System
SMU - #1 - Dickinson System, Houlgate System, Sagarin Ratings
TCU - co#1 - Williamson System

1936:
LSU - #1 - Sagarin Ratings, Williamson System
Pitt - #1 - Boand System, College Football Researchers Association, Houlgate System

1940:
Stanford - #1 - Billingsley Report, Helms Athletic Foundation, Poling System
Tennessee - #1 - Dunkel System, Williamson System

1941:
Alabama - #1 - Houlgate System
Texas - #1 - Berryman (QPRS), Williamson System

1960:
Iowa - #1 - Berryman (QPRS), Boand System, Litkenhous, Sagarin Ratings
Ole Miss - #1 - Billingsley Report, College Football Researchers Association, DeVold System, Dunkel System, Football Writers Association of America, National Championship Foundation, Williamson System
Missouri - #1 - Poling System
Washington - #1 - Helms Athletic Foundation
Click to expand...

Please stop responding to him in this thread.
 
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

mnstate0fhockey said:
Please stop responding to him in this thread.
Click to expand...

It's just funny to watch him back himself into a corner and not realize it. It's like playing chess with a 3 year old. :p:D:D

As for this thread (I'll quit responding to JDUMBS...but just for you ;)), I hope the B1G does whatever it has to do to try to entice other B1G schools into college hockey. If they can do that, it will be a great success for the sport in general. If they need to have a shootout (amongst other things) in order to help draw those other schools in, then so be it.
 
Fighting Sioux 23 said:
It's just funny to watch him back himself into a corner and not realize it. It's like playing chess with a 3 year old. :p:D:D

As for this thread (I'll quit responding to JDUMBS...but just for you ;)), I hope the B1G does whatever it has to do to try to entice other B1G schools into college hockey. If they can do that, it will be a great success for the sport in general. If they need to have a shootout (amongst other things) in order to help draw those other schools in, then so be it.
Click to expand...

Thanks. I appreciate it :)

I agree. Getting more Big Ten schools to add D1 programs would be great for the sport.
 
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

With any luck, the non-hockey schools in the Big <strike>Ten</strike> <strike>Televen</strike> Tenve will be able to see the moneymaking potential of the BTHC without us all having to put up with the childish dog and pony show that is shootouts.
 
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

ExileOnDaytonStreet said:
With any luck, the non-hockey schools in the Big <strike>Ten</strike> <strike>Televen</strike> Tenve will be able to see the moneymaking potential of the BTHC without us all having to put up with the childish dog and pony show that is shootouts.
Click to expand...

Isn't it all thrown in the pot?
 
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

ExileOnDaytonStreet said:
I wasn't necessarily talking just TV revenue, but yes that is a fair point.
Click to expand...

And that's a fair point as well. There is at least one Michigan fan on here that I'm aware of that is irritated that Michigan shares so much football revenue with Minnesota. Footballl and Men's Basketball drive the ship as we're all aware.
 
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

I love how J-Dubbs will get painted into a corner, then just walk across the wet paint and paint himself into a different corner.

I'm for what helps get new schools to add hockey and if it takes a shootout to drum up some support I guess, but is Iowa gonna say no and then you tell them there's shootouts and they're in? I mean its not like we're talking about offering Mr. Ducksworth his own jersey
 
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

ScoobyDoo said:
Yep. The network revenues are divided evenly among the schools. It's a net loss to Minnesota to have their games on that Network.
Click to expand...
I feel for Minnesota on this. God Forbid the women's teams reach 6 schools playing.
 
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

darker98 said:
I feel for Minnesota on this. God Forbid the women's teams reach 6 schools playing.
Click to expand...

Actually considering the football angle it's fine in the long run. I'm sure you're being sarcastic but I want you to understand that I understand that.
 
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

JDUBBS1280 said:
So, Minnesota is allowed to recognize those, but not the 1940 championship in hockey?

You proved yourself right on this point, but proved yourself wrong on the greater point.

Minnesota officially has 7 hockey national championships. Now we can move on to other discussions :)
Click to expand...

Sorry but I have to ask. When was this ever the discussion in this thread? We have that whole thing going in it's own thread.

Gotta love the progression of this thread, how it started with officials and now we're here. Good times. :)
 
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

Tiggsy said:
Sorry but I have to ask. When was this ever the discussion in this thread? We have that whole thing going in it's own thread.

Gotta love the progression of this thread, how it started with officials and now we're here. Good times. :)
Click to expand...


I just love having to explain my jabs, but I guess I have to spell it out for JDUMB. I was saying that the schools who generate the revenue (now) will make the decisions and it won't matter what Minnesota wants because they aren't currently good at football or basketball.

I don't even know if this is true (the part about who decides, not the part about the Gophers sucking at football and hoops - they do), but is was a snarky thing to say in the moment, in real time - and it was in regards to shootouts, nothing more.

Of course, he took it to mean something about historical achievements of the programs in question and managed to tie it back to the Gopher's AAU Holiday Invitational Tourney Title - just like every thread he's ever in. Just love people who never have any idea when someone is just talking s-h-i-t. They're always the life of a party.

Just when I think he can't be any more of a doosh...
 
Last edited:
Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference

Gurtholfin said:
I just love having to explain my jabs, but I guess I have to spell it out for JDUMB. I was saying that the schools who generate the revenue (now) will make the decisions and it won't matter what Minnesota wants because they aren't currently good at football or basketball.

I don't even know if this is true (the part about who decides, not the part about the Gophers sucking at football and hoops - they do), but is was a snarky thing to say in the moment, in real time - and it was in regards to shootouts, nothing more.

Of course, he took it to mean something about historical achievements of the programs in question and managed to tie it back to the Gopher's AAU Holiday Invitational Tourney Title - just like every thread he's ever in. Just love people who never have any idea when someone is just talking s-h-i-t. They're always the life of a party.

Just when I think he can't be any more of a doosh...
Click to expand...

I hate that you quoted me in your post because it makes it look like I didn't get what the point was. :p. Still seems like a bit of a jump to me especially since I didn't see Dubbs go there right away. But why should I get uptight about threads spiraling downward now when I had a hand in a few. Probably not as many as you, Gurt but you give me something to strive for. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top