That article seems to mirror the B1G hockey conference nicely. A lot of arrogance and bluster, not much content.
Five out of the seven teams including Notre Dame that are members of the Big Ten hockey conference have been division one hockey programs since 1947, the year the league was officially formed. Ohio State joined in 1963, Penn State in 2012. The teams, other than Penn State, are not new to division one college hockey. A power conference, one that has distinct advantages over all other conferences, is a new reality that hockey fans will have to grow to accept.
"The Fabled Big Ten Hockey Conference"?? Fabled is not one of the adjectives that comes to mind when thinking about Big 10 hockey.
Yet they have the most clout when it comes to legislation affecting college hockey.
Yeah, according to USCHO, Notre Dame effectively started up in '68-69, and didn't field a program in '83-84 as they transitioned back to "independent" status. http://www.uscho.com/stats/history/notre-dame/mens-hockey/2015-2016/Wait a minute. Notre Dame definitely did not have a D-I team yet when I started college in 1964-65. Wisconsin's program was quite new and independent at the time. That makes it three.
Notre Dame also gave up on hockey for a year or two in the early 1980's.
"The Fabled Big Ten Hockey Conference"?? Fabled is not one of the adjectives that comes to mind when thinking about Big 10 hockey.
* BigTen definition of "poised" = "I really wish we could add a hockey team too..."
"The Fabled Big Ten Hockey Conference"?? Fabled is not one of the adjectives that comes to mind when thinking about Big 10 hockey.