hawkhockey
Registered User
Re: All-Academic Teams
I tend to think these all academic teams are a little silly but they can have an adverse effect , as an unintended consequence, when viewed by those not familiar with the schools . For example,if you did not know about any school in the ECAC East, you might come to an uniformed conclusion that Castleton had
"smarter " hockey players than Babson, which may or may not be the case.
The fact is that , as previously stated, hockey demands a substantial amount of time at the DIII level and all players should be commended for the successes in the classroom as well as on the ice.
One measure that "might" be interesting is to take a look at the number 3.0 's as a percentage of the entire student body at a college and then compare that to the individual teams. It might give us a better insight into the grading policies of a school as a method of comparing apples to apples.
Having said that, not sure if it is worth the time or effort.
I tend to think these all academic teams are a little silly but they can have an adverse effect , as an unintended consequence, when viewed by those not familiar with the schools . For example,if you did not know about any school in the ECAC East, you might come to an uniformed conclusion that Castleton had
"smarter " hockey players than Babson, which may or may not be the case.
The fact is that , as previously stated, hockey demands a substantial amount of time at the DIII level and all players should be commended for the successes in the classroom as well as on the ice.
One measure that "might" be interesting is to take a look at the number 3.0 's as a percentage of the entire student body at a college and then compare that to the individual teams. It might give us a better insight into the grading policies of a school as a method of comparing apples to apples.
Having said that, not sure if it is worth the time or effort.