UncleRay
M-A-I-N-E, GooOOO, Blue!
Re: ACHA D1 to NCAA D1
Let me try one more time.
This is the order of events that I hear you saying is occurring:
1) A couple boosters decide that UN-L should go DI in men's hockey.
2) They put a pile of cash together.
3) They build a small rink.
4) They tell the AD what is going to happen and announce they want to go DI.
5) They raise a pile more money to expand the rink they just built.
6) They start playing DI men's hockey.
I don't understand, from a financial perspective, why they don't
1) A couple boosters decide that UN-L should go DI in men's hockey.
2) They put a pile of cash together.
4) They tell the AD what is going to happen and announce they want to go DI.
5) They raise a pile more money to build a DI rink AND pay for scholarships for a few years.
6) They start playing DI men's hockey.
I'm not saying it isn't happening the way you say, I just don't understand why the tail that wags the dog would keep quiet and take an intermediate step that costs a big pile of money when they could just go from status quo to final solution in one fell swoop. And please don't say it is to see if they will get the fans in the seats - there is a difference so large between ACHA DIII and NC$$ DI that they aren't comparable. I can't imagine any organization using club hockey data to justify DI expenditures.
Let me try one more time.
This is the order of events that I hear you saying is occurring:
1) A couple boosters decide that UN-L should go DI in men's hockey.
2) They put a pile of cash together.
3) They build a small rink.
4) They tell the AD what is going to happen and announce they want to go DI.
5) They raise a pile more money to expand the rink they just built.
6) They start playing DI men's hockey.
I don't understand, from a financial perspective, why they don't
1) A couple boosters decide that UN-L should go DI in men's hockey.
2) They put a pile of cash together.
4) They tell the AD what is going to happen and announce they want to go DI.
5) They raise a pile more money to build a DI rink AND pay for scholarships for a few years.
6) They start playing DI men's hockey.
I'm not saying it isn't happening the way you say, I just don't understand why the tail that wags the dog would keep quiet and take an intermediate step that costs a big pile of money when they could just go from status quo to final solution in one fell swoop. And please don't say it is to see if they will get the fans in the seats - there is a difference so large between ACHA DIII and NC$$ DI that they aren't comparable. I can't imagine any organization using club hockey data to justify DI expenditures.
Last edited: