What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Acadia @ RPI 10/6/11

Re: 2-1 rpi

Re: 2-1 rpi

Chalk up a win-even if it doesnt count. Third period i rate our boys as a B+. Still a few defensive lapses but no question they did not tire in the period and we did find ways to put people in the crease and in front of the net. Nice that lots of people contributed-every line seemed to do something. We will have to do a lot of work this week to prepare for next weekend as the competition will be far superior to tonight. But freshmen and sophomores seem to fit in well. i would still start merriam next week but have the other 2 boys ready. Kasdorf did not look out of place at all.
 
Re: Acadia @ RPI 10/6/11

Game ends with RPI up 6-2.
The Engineers played better in each period and that should be something to build on. It was just an exhibition, so we really don't know what we gained from the contest.
RPITV unfortunately gets a C+. First period and the picture was excellent. However, the streaming in the second and third periods was basically non existent.
I hope that this can be rectified as I really enjoyed the first period.
 
Re: 2-1 rpi

Re: 2-1 rpi

Chalk up a win-even if it doesnt count. Third period i rate our boys as a B+. Still a few defensive lapses but no question they did not tire in the period and we did find ways to put people in the crease and in front of the net. Nice that lots of people contributed-every line seemed to do something. We will have to do a lot of work this week to prepare for next weekend as the competition will be far superior to tonight. But freshmen and sophomores seem to fit in well. i would still start merriam next week but have the other 2 boys ready. Kasdorf did not look out of place at all.

I think that Diebold played the best of the three, but I agree with Kurt that Merriam is starter for now. Kasdorf didn't face many difficult shots but saved everything that he faced.
 
Re: Acadia @ RPI 10/6/11

Game ends with RPI up 6-2.
The Engineers played better in each period and that should be something to build on. It was just an exhibition, so we really don't know what we gained from the contest.
RPITV unfortunately gets a C+. First period and the picture was excellent. However, the streaming in the second and third periods was basically non existent.
I hope that this can be rectified as I really enjoyed the first period.
Interesting. My feed was better in the second and third than in the first.
 
Re: Acadia @ RPI 10/6/11

RPITV unfortunately gets a C+. First period and the picture was excellent. However, the streaming in the second and third periods was basically non existent.
I hope that this can be rectified as I really enjoyed the first period.
Watched starting in the middle of the 1st and had absolutely zero issues with the streaming quality at any point.

Only issues I saw with the production was some missed graphics and the score title bar looks a little strange when there's no penalty going on, but that's just personal preference.
 
Re: Acadia @ RPI 10/6/11

Watched starting in the middle of the 1st and had absolutely zero issues with the streaming quality at any point.

Only issues I saw with the production was some missed graphics and the score title bar looks a little strange when there's no penalty going on, but that's just personal preference.

Enjoyed the boradcast immensely. Video was far better than the old B2 we had for years. My only suggestion is to find a way to turn up the audio a bit more. It was extremely low and then corrected to only pretty low. i listeded to the radio feed instead-which was 9 seconds ahead of the video and that much delay is a bit difficult to follow.
 
Back
Top