Would these neo-liberals be as open minded if NAMABLA were to adopt the nickname "North Dakota State University Hockey Brawlers" and peddle clothing, curios and articles bearing this nickname and who-knows-what graphics?
even Redskins
Would these neo-liberals be as open minded if NAMABLA were to adopt the nickname ?
Question? What if a school was to rename itself as the Area Clowns? Would this cause any problems with any Clown Unions perhaps?)
It is also my understanding, and please correct me if I'm wrong, that the local Sioux love the team and see it as a source of great pride.
"Seminole" and "Sioux" denote groups legally recognized by United States law. The U.S. even has formal treaties with these groups (but not with "The Fighting Irish.") The posters above have a remarkably liberal attitude toward appropriating another group's LEGAL identity and using it as their own.
Would these neo-liberals be as open minded if NAMABLA were to adopt the nickname "North Dakota State University Hockey Brawlers" and peddle clothing, curios and articles bearing this nickname and who-knows-what graphics?
Why is it that posters like Osorojo and hokydad always show up and send a perfectly good thread down the ****ter?
You'll notice over 300 different tribes...including Utes (which you said was fine in an earlier post).
Because Tech fans can't have nice things.Why is it that posters like Osorojo and hokydad always show up and send a perfectly good thread down the ****ter?
Hell yes. I'm for anything and everything that reflects poorly on NDSU.
Actually, the sues' biggest problem is that when the BTHC comes about, Minnesota will no longer play any games against the sue.
I don't know the legal stuff either, but I'd think they could use the fighting Sioux, but don't think the could use UND and profit from it.I don't know the legalese behind this kind of thing. I think the original post was getting at this...is there anything stopping a company from making Fighting Sioux gear after the University stops using it? If a fan could buy a UND Whatevers jersey from the University store or a Fighting Sioux jersey from the sporting goods store across the street, what do you think he or she would buy? Even if it isn't officially licensed stuff, if it is high quality and uses the same artwork, I can't see the stuff not selling.
I don't know the legal stuff either, but I'd think they could use the fighting Sioux, but don't think the could use UND and profit from it.
If North Dakota were for some reason adopt "The Lady Ga-Ga's" as their nickname they would be stopped in a flash. Same goes if they were to call themselves "The Fighting U.S. Marines." What in blazes besides bigotry makes any person or group think they can use the name of another person or group to identify themselves and turn a profit?
Is Fighting Sioux more offensive than Fighting Utes?Knights, Utes, Cowboys, Bozos, Mariners, Canadiens, Dimwits, Yankees, Irish, even Redskins - all are collective, non specific nouns and the law deems members or wanna-be members of such groups are not harmed by misuse or profitable use of these names. To belabor the obvious: you can call your outfit "The Fighting Warriors" or "The Fighting Soldiers," but you can't call them "The Fighting U.S. Marines" no matter how much money an alum donates.
"Sioux" and "Seminole" are two specific nouns which denote specific, discrete groups of people with common social, tribal and economic interests. Unauthorized public use of their names would seem to constitute identity theft. Sports fans are assuredly tribal in nature, but let them create their own identities and totems rather than pirate and rely upon the reputations of others.