This is how I approach it as well. I don't try and play the gas price game. You're going to wind up winning and losing unless you really know how to game the system. But then again, you'd be spending so much time on it that the cost savings just wouldn't be worth it.
.Why do you think that frivolous usage of oil by US consumers does not affect the world market? The US uses 22% of the world's oil production (despite having 4% of the world's population), and 70% of our usage is in transportation, so the single largest user of oil in the world (by far) is the US automobile driver.
Typically not worth it for me to worry about price shopping. Maximum amount of gas I will take is between 15-16 gallons, 93 octane. I usually get 20-25 mpg. So even if I find a station that is $0.05 cheaper than another, it would need to be less than 4-5 miles further, otherwise I'm not saving. I'll take convenience over saving up to $1.00.
That said, I am glad that I'm now paying ~$.25 less per gallon now down in Florida. * New York and their stupid taxes.
the highest we saw in our drive across the country $4.82 in Idaho. diesel. most were in the $4.25 - $4.50 range.
I'd be more curious to see the split based on GDP rather than population. See who squeezes the most money out of each barrel they use.
A lot of the reason is that the USA is relatively less densely populated than most industrialized countries. A lot of travel between population centers.
Oil just plunged $3 in the span of 20 minutes. Rumblings of a possible SPR release, though White House denies it. Could be a fat finger as well.
Brent didn't go down. The spread is nearing $21 (it was $18 earlier today). Perhaps the White House put in another anti-infrastructure policy.
Nope, Brent took it in the shorts too.
(That post oughta draw some comments.)
Isn't that nice, too bad your survival in the city depends on oil and its cost affects you every day
Oil just plunged $3 in the span of 20 minutes. Rumblings of a possible SPR release, though White House denies it. Could be a fat finger as well.
or just a thin trading day (Jewish holiday) with an outsized order to execute. Someone unwinding a position perhaps?
Here's a thought for pipelines and their corresponding right-of-way: Why couldn't we use rights-of-way that already exist, such as interstate highways? You'd have to do this with the highways where they're on the ground instead of elevated (with a possible consideration when it comes to bridges where the highway is elevated), and there is an actual median instead of a Jersey barrier or guard rail on the pavement, but I would think it's possible. You'd have right of way containing at least 25 feet on each side of the pipeline and it's fairly easily accessible, given you already have many state and U.S. highways running parallel to the interstates in case traffic must be shut down to deal with a serious problem.
This wouldn't be the first time the country has recycled infrastructure, as the railroad companies used the Erie Canal right-of-way to build some tracks in the past (at least along the mule promenade), but both still remained in use.
Here's a thought for pipelines and their corresponding right-of-way: Why couldn't we use rights-of-way that already exist, such as interstate highways? You'd have to do this with the highways where they're on the ground instead of elevated (with a possible consideration when it comes to bridges where the highway is elevated), and there is an actual median instead of a Jersey barrier or guard rail on the pavement, but I would think it's possible. You'd have right of way containing at least 25 feet on each side of the pipeline and it's fairly easily accessible, given you already have many state and U.S. highways running parallel to the interstates in case traffic must be shut down to deal with a serious problem.
This wouldn't be the first time the country has recycled infrastructure, as the railroad companies used the Erie Canal right-of-way to build some tracks in the past (at least along the mule promenade), but both still remained in use.