USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
- Thread starter fr. joe
- Start date
Ralph Baer
Let's Go 'Tute!
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
Lots of penalties
Lots of penalties
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
Fortunately I didn't see anything there that was suspension-worthy.
Fortunately I didn't see anything there that was suspension-worthy.
Ralph Baer
Let's Go 'Tute!
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
When the smoke clears it looks like an RPI power play.
When the smoke clears it looks like an RPI power play.
Ralph Baer
Let's Go 'Tute!
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
final
RPI 4
Brown 1
final
RPI 4
Brown 1
Ralph Baer
Let's Go 'Tute!
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
Next week's thread
http://board.uscho.com/showthread.php?107788-RPI-amp-Union-Colgate-amp-Cornell-(2-14-2-15)
Next week's thread
http://board.uscho.com/showthread.php?107788-RPI-amp-Union-Colgate-amp-Cornell-(2-14-2-15)
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
Are you kidding? When does the smoke clear and we end up with a man advantage? Other than at the end of the 2nd OT in Detroit in 1985?
Are you kidding? When does the smoke clear and we end up with a man advantage? Other than at the end of the 2nd OT in Detroit in 1985?
Ralph Baer
Let's Go 'Tute!
RPI fan 4 life
Season Ticket Holder since 1974
BTW, I spoke with OGC after the game tonight. The refs informed him that an Brown player bumped into Diebold which caused him to turn away from the net and when he got back into position, the puck was in the net. They called it incidental goaltender interference (a new one to me) which is not a penalty, but simply a face off outside the zone. FYI.
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
My take from the catwalk (although I was not on the air)...The waved off Brown goal was obvious to me. I think the only reason it was reviewed was that Whittet asked for it, I don't think there was any chance they were going to reverse it. It looked like they also had signaled a penalty on Brown, but obviously none was called. The penalty on DeVito, I could see coming a mile away, and it was NOT a bad call by the refs at any means. In fact, I had the clipboard in my hand to write down the penalty before it was even called. At no point though did I think that RPI was going to lose. They need to play like this (minus the penalties) the rest of the way, and take 12 points.
My take from the catwalk (although I was not on the air)...The waved off Brown goal was obvious to me. I think the only reason it was reviewed was that Whittet asked for it, I don't think there was any chance they were going to reverse it. It looked like they also had signaled a penalty on Brown, but obviously none was called. The penalty on DeVito, I could see coming a mile away, and it was NOT a bad call by the refs at any means. In fact, I had the clipboard in my hand to write down the penalty before it was even called. At no point though did I think that RPI was going to lose. They need to play like this (minus the penalties) the rest of the way, and take 12 points.
Ralph Baer
Let's Go 'Tute!
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
I recall that you complained that you did not get a seat cushion.
I recall that you complained that you did not get a seat cushion.
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
I was on the air for the first intermission only, whatever Kurt and Ryan said about me, I was not privvy too. Kurt had a beef with me last night anyway.
I recall that you complained that you did not get a seat cushion.
I was on the air for the first intermission only, whatever Kurt and Ryan said about me, I was not privvy too. Kurt had a beef with me last night anyway.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
The rule is that if the man is in the crease and is either screening the goaltender or physically preventing the goaltender from moving into position to attempt to block the shot, it is a crease violation. This is a paraphrase of what is in the rulebook, but the essence of the rule is there.
Why is it Hicks is always involved with these sorts of calls? He trying to get redemption from three years ago?
The rule is that if the man is in the crease and is either screening the goaltender or physically preventing the goaltender from moving into position to attempt to block the shot, it is a crease violation. This is a paraphrase of what is in the rulebook, but the essence of the rule is there.
Why is it Hicks is always involved with these sorts of calls? He trying to get redemption from three years ago?
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
I should look at the video again. On the replay I didn't see the bump...all I saw was a Brown skate very briefly and marginally going in and out of the crease before the puck arrived. But if there was a bump before that, it might have been the right call.
I should look at the video again. On the replay I didn't see the bump...all I saw was a Brown skate very briefly and marginally going in and out of the crease before the puck arrived. But if there was a bump before that, it might have been the right call.
engineerhockeyfan
PUCKMAN RULES!!!
Re: 37th BRF! Brown @ RPI
Personally, I thought that it was a make up call. They had already scored one goal on the two man advantage. And after SA's argument when the penalties were called, I don't think that the officials wanted to grant two goals on that call. JMO.
Personally, I thought that it was a make up call. They had already scored one goal on the two man advantage. And after SA's argument when the penalties were called, I don't think that the officials wanted to grant two goals on that call. JMO.