What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Why the heck would I want to be someone else? That's no fun!

Well, when with one breath you're saying "Obama isn't an American exceptionalist -- boo!" and with the next you're saying "Imperialism is the facade the reptilians from Alpha Draconis use to divide and conquer us!," you'll forgive me for thinking you're not coherent.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Well, when with one breath you're saying "Obama isn't an American exceptionalist -- boo!" and with the next you're saying "Imperialism is the facade the reptilians from Alpha Draconis use to divide and conquer us!," you'll forgive me for thinking you're not coherent.

Never did I use those words.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Always painful to admit, but Bob is right on this one.

The bigger question is why are Turkey's current leaders so afraid of correctly labeling an event that happened 40 years before THEY were born?

I think we still see that same phenomenon all around the world. I'm trying to think of a good example within this country but alas, I'm at work, it's late, and my shutdown is brained.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

You might not get knuckledragger status, but I will welcome you into the light of states' rights. Republicans evolved (by a few "generations") from the Federalists, so of course they champion big government.

I'm not a civil war geek by any means, but didn't Jefferson Davis (along with Uncle Bob Lee) lament the stubborn states' rights contingent that formed the core of the Confederacy but also became a substantial factor in its inability to provide organized and unified support for the war effort?
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Okay, so now that we're one day passed the anniversary apparently, what's the new OUTRAGE OF THE DAY!!!! by our knuckledragger friends? I heard Obama failed to stop and pet a dog during one of his campaign stops. Could this be the first hint of him being an anticaninite????
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Okay, so now that we're one day passed the anniversary apparently, what's the new OUTRAGE OF THE DAY!!!! by our knuckledragger friends? I heard Obama failed to stop and pet a dog during one of his campaign stops. Could this be the first hint of him being an anticaninite????

You telling us he's running for a third term? He's violated most of the Constitution already; might as well violate the rest. :rolleyes:
 
I'm not a civil war geek by any means, but didn't Jefferson Davis (along with Uncle Bob Lee) lament the stubborn states' rights contingent that formed the core of the Confederacy but also became a substantial factor in its inability to provide organized and unified support for the war effort?

The timing of your post is excellent!

http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2015/04/how-the-constitution-was-defeated-in-1788
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

You telling us he's running for a third term? He's violated most of the Constitution already; might as well violate the rest. :rolleyes:

Works for me, but I have a feeling you're going to be getting used to Bill Clinton's 3rd term in the form of Hillary instead. :D

This does raise an interesting point thought. With approval ratings creeping back towards 50%, I'd expect to see Obama hitting the campaign trail for Hillary, although not as often as the most popular politician in America, President Clinton. Question for you and your pals: Will we finally see George W Bush in a GOP political ad? Almost like the dude's fallen off the face of the Earth. I wonder why....
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Okay, so now that we're one day passed the anniversary apparently, what's the new OUTRAGE OF THE DAY!!!! by our knuckledragger friends? I heard Obama failed to stop and pet a dog during one of his campaign stops. Could this be the first hint of him being an anticaninite????
Equating petting a dog to not fully acknowledging the slaughter of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Empire is fail on so many levels. Not one of your best.

Part of what makes this look bad is that Germany, who has very close ties with Turkey and is Turkey's biggest trade partner, is set to officially recognize genocide for the first time via legislation. It'll be interesting to see if there is a price to pay for Germany doing so. If not, that makes it look like Obama (and past administrations) have caved to Turkish pressure for little or no reason. If Turkey really cratered relations with all the countries who use the term genocide, Turkey would have big problems. I read that even Putin calls it genocide and will be at the 100th anniversary events in Armenia.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

As you guys like Putin more than Obama, I'm not surprised to see you cite him as a figure who's lead we should be following. :rolleyes: Ronald Reagan is rolling over in his grave right now.

Where is Obama not acknowledging the deaths? I've seen nothing where he's disputed 1M Armenians died 100 years ago? The semantics of the labeling is what your panties are in a bunch about. Atrocity vs Genocide? At the end of the day you're still dead.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Part of what makes this look bad is that Germany, who has very close ties with Turkey and is Turkey's biggest trade partner, is set to officially recognize genocide for the first time via legislation. It'll be interesting to see if there is a price to pay for Germany doing so. If not, that makes it look like Obama (and past administrations) have caved to Turkish pressure for little or no reason. If Turkey really cratered relations with all the countries who use the term genocide, Turkey would have big problems. I read that even Putin calls it genocide and will be at the 100th anniversary events in Armenia.

Three things about this.

1. The US always carries more symbolism. The Netherlands and New Zealand can get away with foreign policy as ethics -- nobody calls them The Great Satan. We're in more of a bind.

2. Germany can tweak the Turks because there's a lot of anti-Turk nativist (read: racist) sentiment in Germany. It's a good political move.

3. Russia and Turkey are bitter historical rivals. Putin tweaking the Turks is like an Irish pol tweaking the Brits. It's what you do.

Remember, I agree with you that you have a point. However none of these comparisons makes much sense. International relations are not fungibles.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

As you guys like Putin more than Obama, I'm not surprised to see you cite him as a figure who's lead we should be following. :rolleyes: Ronald Reagan is rolling over in his grave right now.

Where is Obama not acknowledging the deaths? I've seen nothing where he's disputed 1M Armenians died 100 years ago? The semantics of the labeling is what your panties are in a bunch about. Atrocity vs Genocide? At the end of the day you're still dead.
Hey, if Putin is more enlightened than Obama in a given area, that says something right there. What do you have against the Armenians? It's a lot more than semantics for a not that large ethnic group to have seen 1.5 million of their people slaughtered. If you were Armenian, you wouldn't make light of all this. Again, you're not at your best here. I'd advise not digging yourself in any deeper.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Three things about this.

1. The US always carries more symbolism. The Netherlands and New Zealand can get away with foreign policy as ethics -- nobody calls them The Great Satan. We're in more of a bind.

2. Germany can tweak the Turks because there's a lot of anti-Turk nativist (read: racist) sentiment in Germany. It's a good political move.

3. Russia and Turkey are bitter historical rivals. Putin tweaking the Turks is like an Irish pol tweaking the Brits. It's what you do.

Remember, I agree with you that you have a point. However none of these comparisons makes much sense. International relations are not fungibles.
1. This cuts both ways. It also carries a lot more weight when we're unwilling to acknowledge something obvious and it carries more risk for Turkey to push back against us than it would to push back against New Zealand or someone like that.

2. Germany also has a very sizable Turkish population and major trade ties, plus all the European ties and all, so again, there are considerations in both directions. And Germany, as the biggest heavyweight in Europe, has some of the stature you assign to the U.S. in your first point.

3. I agree one shouldn't put a lot of weight to the fact that Putin weighs in as he has. Armenia has good relations with Russia, seeing Russia as a bit of a guarantor against large neighboring Muslim nations who have not been friendly toward the Armenians. It still is ironic though that Putin is calling it genocide while Obama avoids such acknowledgment.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

1. This cuts both ways. It also carries a lot more weight when we're unwilling to acknowledge something obvious and it carries more risk for Turkey to push back against us than it would to push back against New Zealand or someone like that.

2. Germany also has a very sizable Turkish population and major trade ties, plus all the European ties and all, so again, there are considerations in both directions. And Germany, as the biggest heavyweight in Europe, has some of the stature you assign to the U.S. in your first point.

3. I agree one shouldn't put a lot of weight to the fact that Putin weighs in as he has. Armenia has good relations with Russia, seeing Russia as a bit of a guarantor against large neighboring Muslim nations who have not been friendly toward the Armenians. It still is ironic though that Putin is calling it genocide while Obama avoids such acknowledgment.

1. Absolutely agree. The bad news is we run the world. The good news is that lets us influence how it's run.

2. Good points, all.

3. I'm immune to the faux moral leadership of Russia because I read RT a lot. They call "genocide" at the drop of a hat as long as it fits their narrative. One really interesting case is the Rape of Nanking. Depending on how relations are going with China and Japan, it's either a tragedy of history or a hoax. I swear they sometimes change so fast they still have old archived stories saying the "wrong" thing. Pravda and RT (not sure if Izvestia is still around) make VOA look like a no spin zone. ;)
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

I don't think the US should do anything based on the sensitive nature of that part of the world right now.

But I do agree that taking such a step as recognizing genocide against the Armenians is a pretty big deal for Germany. Its not just that they are a big trading partner. The relationship with that huge Turkish minority hasn't always been the smoothest, and the Germans are now a very politically correct/sensitive group and that will make for an uncomfortable internal situation. It would have been far easier to not do anything.
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

Hey, if Putin is more enlightened than Obama in a given area, that says something right there. What do you have against the Armenians? It's a lot more than semantics for a not that large ethnic group to have seen 1.5 million of their people slaughtered. If you were Armenian, you wouldn't make light of all this. Again, you're not at your best here. I'd advise not digging yourself in any deeper.

I'm not too concerned with your scorn, Bob. No offense. I'm wondering how often you feel Putin is more enlightened than Obama, as conservatives in general tend to have a soft spot for the guy but I'll let you speak for yourself on that one. I have nothing against the Armenians and they certainly have every right to press the issue. Somehow I don't think solidarity with the Armenians is your angle however.

A final note. At some point people need to move past things. 100 years ago is a long time. Will you start advocating for 40 acres and a mule next (a promise made a mere 50 years prior to 1915)?
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

At some point people need to move past things. 100 years ago is a long time. Will you start advocating for 40 acres and a mule next (a promise made a mere 50 years prior to 1915)?

That's simply not how tribalism works. And it's also not for us to say when somebody's statute of limitations of outrage expires. That's the equivalent of fat GOP whites sanctimoniously lecturing blacks on how they should let slavery go.

If your people effed my people, it's up to me when I decide to forgive you. The Germans don't get to tell the Jews, "last call."
 
Re: 2nd Term Part X - A link to a fore gone conclusion

I'm not too concerned with your scorn, Bob. No offense. I'm wondering how often you feel Putin is more enlightened than Obama, as conservatives in general tend to have a soft spot for the guy but I'll let you speak for yourself on that one. I have nothing against the Armenians and they certainly have every right to press the issue. Somehow I don't think solidarity with the Armenians is your angle however.

A final note. At some point people need to move past things. 100 years ago is a long time. Will you start advocating for 40 acres and a mule next (a promise made a mere 50 years prior to 1915)?
Actually I know some Armenians, so it's more than just an academic exercise to me. 100 years is a long time. A long time for Turkey to deny historical fact. If Turkey had acknowledged this long ago, everyone would have moved on, relations and life in the region would likely be better, and Turkey wouldn't look more backward than a Kepler description of Alabama.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top