Wait a minute! I support our efforts to help the freedom loving people of Osterlich from the evil hordes from Tomainia! No price is too high!
Guess it's all in how you look at it. In government speak, Obama would say he's cut the deficit by $1.2 trillion. To me $700 billion is still a staggeringly large amount and the long term projections with boomers retiring and going onto medicare and all are bleak.
We should slash our overseas military deployments. We've got bases all over the world and in many cases we really don't need bases we we have them. And having military bases we pay for overseas is an expensive proposition. I've heard this from a number of folks I know in the military.
I agree, I'm sure one concern is the amount of stranded resources and unemployment that would result. Those bases are like small cities and the amount of support jobs/manufacturing/technology is likely part of the equation.
So, we close the base...probably can't sell it. The military personnel are still paid, it costs money to shut them down and ship the equipment etc. All kinds of discontinued operations. An accountant's wet dream. If all of those military people return to the US, what do they do? Do we need to house them here, are they all discharged?
Closing a Walmart in England would have some ramifications, closing military bases across the globe would probably cost more in studies, logistics etc. than they'd save.
This is the government we're talking about...doing anything costs more money, doing nothing costs more money...thinking about doing something costs more money.
Does anybody think that a person's sexual orientation should be used as the basis as to whether or not they should be Olympic representatives?Does anyone think that a President Romney chooses a delegation with anyone who is openly gay to go to Russia?
Does anybody think that a person's sexual orientation should be used as the basis as to whether or not they should be Olympic representatives?
Why is we're always told that we shouldn't base our opinions of people based upon whatever differences there may be between us yet our leaders constantly look for that same whatever as the very reason we're told they're representing us? Also, why rub Russia's noses in it? Why try to spite the host nation. Now we're just picking fights for the sake of picking fights.
Why is it our concern that Russia is wrong? Their actions on this subject in no way impact the United States. And it's not cowering to a foreign power to simply pick people to represent our country based upon their merit and only their merit. Instead we're picking a fight. It's asinine and serves no true purpose other than to let other countries that we don't respect them. Russia and all other nations that have the same/similar policies as them will not give a care as to what our policies are here.Because Russia is wrong? Since when does the US cower to other countries? Should we dip our flag at these games so we don't spite the host nation? Let's tell Johnny Weir he can't compete because we don't want to be picking fights just for the sake of picking fights!
While you're there maybe Rod will give you a clue.I think I've entered the Twilight Zone.
While you're there maybe Rod will give you a clue.
I'd really like to see your answer to St. Clowns questions. Why should it make one bit of difference that a delegation member is gay? I had to look up to see who Johnny Weir is. He seems to have had it right when he initially answered questions about his sexuality with (to paraphrase) "what difference does it make to my sport". IMO, there is absolutely no reason we should not put a gay on the delegation, however, to do so because they are gay is equally as wrong. Discrimination does work both ways out here in the Twilight Zone
I'm an American, and by the simple political construct of this nation and the world at large, I have the potential to have a say in what happens in this nation. So why you're trying to dictate policy to a country to which we don't belong, I'll concentrate on this nation where I can make my voice heard to officials who at least have to pretend to care about my opinion on occasion. Meanwhile, Vladmir Putin never has to pretend.So it makes no difference to us, so we shouldn't care that it makes a difference to others? So since my grandparents were white and lived in the North, they shouldn't have cared about Jim Crow laws in the South? We shouldn't care about antisemitism laws in Germany because we're not German? I have a comfortable income, so I shouldn't care about the poor because I'm not poor? Why did Reagan care if Gorbachev tore down That Wall? He wasn't living behind it.
I'm straight, so I guess I shouldn't care about gay people.
And my original question has not been answered: If Mitt Romney were president, do you think he would select an openly gay person to the delegation, regardless of his/her qualifications?
I'm an American, and by the simple political construct of this nation and the world at large, I have the potential to have a say in what happens in this nation. So why you're trying to dictate policy to a country to which we don't belong, I'll concentrate on this nation where I can make my voice heard to officials who at least have to pretend to care about my opinion on occasion. Meanwhile, Vladmir Putin never has to pretend.
As to Reagan and Gorbachev, Reagan was speaking to the leader of a nation who was interested in and taking action at changing the system there already. Reagan knew his words weren't being spoken to a man who would laugh at him in response. Putin has a giant, preemptive F-U, America sign propped up besides the main entrance to the Kremlin. Antagonizing him will do no good.
As to whether Romney would have sent an openly gay person to represent the US at the Olympics, I have no idea and anyone claiming to know is blowing smoke out their a**es. His political stances were like a sheet blowing in the wind during a tornado.
You're the one who seems to think its a big deal, whats your answer(is if I don't know). Obama is one brave guy sending a gay man over to Russia, BTW thats sarcasmAnd my original question has not been answered: If Mitt Romney were president, do you think he would select an openly gay person to the delegation, regardless of his/her qualifications?
So Putin is not interested in things like trade. Interesting. Very well. Next time a GOP president says we have to invade a foreign land because of the people there (like, they're getting gassed) I trust you'll all be just as isolationist.
BS. Stop being such a baby. I've never said that we have to take an isolationist policy, just that we don't need to ram our morals down the throats of every trading partner. If we cut off trade with those nations with which we disagree on some subject or another we're in for a very short trading list. Not every country on this planet needs to look and act like the United States of America. Or would you rather homogenize the globe, Oh Tolerant Multi-Culturalist Liberal One?
We just need to ram our morals down the throats of certain trading partners.