Re: 2nd Term Part 4: Donkeys, Elephants, and Porcupines
According to the Treasury Dept Inspector General,
Further corroboration from the House Ways and Means Committee:
Furthermore, whomever on the left thinks that they should be crowing about the IRS investigating progressives isn't thinking very clearly: so the IRS is abusing more people than just conservatives and we are supposed to be reassured by that?? are you nuts? The IRS already has too much power and too much discretion, and now we want to turn over the administration of the nation's entire healthcare system to them as well, starting next year?
No thank you!
And for reliability and sources, I'll take the word of the Treasury Dept inspector general over any other source you care to cite on this particular issue. Career bureaucrats knowingly and deliberately tried to stifle groups critical of too much government power. This shouldn't even be a political issue but one of individual liberty and good governance. If they can get away with doing this to conservatives today, who's to say who might be next?
According to the Treasury Dept Inspector General,
Russell George, the Treasury inspector general whose original audit broke open the scandal,...In a letter released Thursday, Mr. George couldn't have been clearer: The evidence showed conservative groups were singled out for abuse by the IRS, not liberal groups. While some liberal groups might have wound up on a BOLO list, the IRS did not target them. "We did not find evidence that the criteria you identified, labeled 'Progressives,' were used by the IRS to select potential political cases during the 2010 to 2012 timeframe we audited." One hundred percent of the groups with "Tea Party," "Patriot" or "9/12" in their names were given extra scrutiny. "While we have multiple sources of information corroborating the use of Tea Party and other related criteria . . . including employee interviews, e-mails, and other documents, we found no indication in any of these other materials that 'progressives' was a term used to refer cases for scrutiny for political campaign intervention." [emphasis added]
Further corroboration from the House Ways and Means Committee:
only seven of the 298 cases flagged by the IRS for extra scrutiny appeared to represent progressive causes. Not one of the seven was subject to harassment or abuse. Of the seven, only two were even sent follow-up questionnaires after their applications for tax exempt status were received. Neither of those two was asked inappropriate or invasive questions. And all seven saw their applications approved.
Conservative groups were treated differently, sent to a secondary review group after being flagged for scrutiny. They were subject to undue burdens and harassment—lengthy and invasive questions about donors and even prayer habits. There, in the secondary offices, some of them languished for years. "Some of them are still languishing," said the source
Furthermore, whomever on the left thinks that they should be crowing about the IRS investigating progressives isn't thinking very clearly: so the IRS is abusing more people than just conservatives and we are supposed to be reassured by that?? are you nuts? The IRS already has too much power and too much discretion, and now we want to turn over the administration of the nation's entire healthcare system to them as well, starting next year?
No thank you!
And for reliability and sources, I'll take the word of the Treasury Dept inspector general over any other source you care to cite on this particular issue. Career bureaucrats knowingly and deliberately tried to stifle groups critical of too much government power. This shouldn't even be a political issue but one of individual liberty and good governance. If they can get away with doing this to conservatives today, who's to say who might be next?
Last edited: