What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2026 Bracketology: The Road to the Aud

Lord_Zubin said:
I know we've all had our fair share of complaints about the NPI this year but at least it's not what's happening in the club hockey scene right now. Midland University from Nebraska just made the ACHA d1 national tournament as an AT LARGE TEAM with a 7-22-5 record. They're SOS was so extremely high since 20 of their games were against top 10 teams. They didn't even do well in those games they went 1-19.Imagine winning 20% of ur games and still making the national tournament. Safe to say the formulas will be adjusted in that league for next year.
Click to expand...
So you're saying it could always be worse...? :ROFLMAO:
 
Lord_Zubin said:
I know we've all had our fair share of complaints about the NPI this year but at least it's not what's happening in the club hockey scene right now. Midland University from Nebraska just made the ACHA d1 national tournament as an AT LARGE TEAM with a 7-22-5 record. They're SOS was so extremely high since 20 of their games were against top 10 teams. They didn't even do well in those games they went 1-19.Imagine winning 20% of ur games and still making the national tournament. Safe to say the formulas will be adjusted in that league for next year.
Click to expand...
The NCAA (especially at the D-3 level) loves to fix what ain't broke, just for the sake of putting its greasy fingerprints on the process.

Any, ANY, person who knows even the basics of statistical analysis would have opted for the KRACH, but the PWR was fairly predictive as well.

Now we have another iteration of petty thumbs on the scale. A return to idiocy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top