Poulin on Hattrick watch in a 4-1 game vs the Czechs. Scored her 100 and 101 goal tonight for Team Canada (in her career, not this game, although the Canada and US dominance sometimes feels that way).
The TSN coverage is again just so special and so well done.
Watched most of the USA's first two preliminary games which, as is the usual, saw them trounce Japan and then Switzerland by 7-1 and 9-1 scores respectfully. Not real exciting, due to the talent discrepancy in both games, but fun to watch nonetheless. Too early to draw any conclusions, but I very much liked what I saw in these two preliminary games.
https://teamusa.usahockey.com/2023womensworlds
Desbiens has a 20-0 record in Olympic and World Championship play. Clearly, she is the best goalie to ever play for the Canadian women's team. I am very concerned whether there is a succession plan in place for when she retires. Canada's number 2 backup goalie looks shaky and so it will remain to be seen who can fill the very large shoes (skates) of Desbiens when she retires. She is not going to play forever, and so the Canadian women's program would be best to develop a succession plan. ;
Canada's PP has been looking bad lately. Need to fix.
And to think the canadian's flunked her out of a camp prior to this run is really sad. They don't deserve her. I would think she has a lot of good years left in her yet.
In response to Cornholio, hopefully a pro league will fix some it at some point.
I think there was some hope at one time with Sweden once knocking off the US a while back and Finland making some noise a few years ago but now they both are not competitive they have been relegated to group B (?).
We're waiting on this supposed PWHPA league backed by Dodgers owner Mark Walter and Billie Jean King that is supposed to launch this year. Speculation is the announcement will come in Brampton timed at the end of the tournament but I remember hearing "tune in next week" during the PWPHA streams in MarchI should say the way I think a pro league would improve upon things is it would give us a chance to watch Players of Knigjt and Poulin caliber play more competitive games and it would give an elite player like Alina Muller a chance to actually win now and again, to show us what she could do if she had teammates and federation support like what Poulin and Knight have.
The above assumes their pro league actually exists at some point and has a tv contract.
The separation of the US/Canada vrs rest-of-the-world looks to be getting even wider. This is starting to become a joke, and I am afraid if there can't be a way to find some kind of parity this will hurt the women's game going forward. Some serious changes need to be made. The US/Canada programs are so much more well funded and supported vrs what everyone else can do that it might not even make sense to have a worlds going forward in the current format. I think there was some hope at one time with Sweden once knocking off the US a while back and Finland making some noise a few years ago but now they both are not competitive they have been relegated to group B (?). No one else can be competitive with US/Canada. I'd be for allowing the US and Canada to field two teams (a US-East/West and Canada East/West or something) or dropping the residency requirements to play in-country or allow heritage players for the non-US/Canada teams or something. The rest-of-the-world needs some serious help to have this tournament be more than just a skills competition for the north american teams, a meaningless Canada-US game in round-robin and then only a single game of note with the inevitable US-Canada championship game. Just have them play a 7 game series and the rest of the world play for a bronze in their own format could work too.
The separation of the US/Canada vrs rest-of-the-world looks to be getting even wider. This is starting to become a joke, and I am afraid if there can't be a way to find some kind of parity this will hurt the women's game going forward. Some serious changes need to be made. The US/Canada programs are so much more well funded and supported vrs what everyone else can do that it might not even make sense to have a worlds going forward in the current format. I think there was some hope at one time with Sweden once knocking off the US a while back and Finland making some noise a few years ago but now they both are not competitive they have been relegated to group B (?). No one else can be competitive with US/Canada. I'd be for allowing the US and Canada to field two teams (a US-East/West and Canada East/West or something) or dropping the residency requirements to play in-country or allow heritage players for the non-US/Canada teams or something. The rest-of-the-world needs some serious help to have this tournament be more than just a skills competition for the north american teams, a meaningless Canada-US game in round-robin and then only a single game of note with the inevitable US-Canada championship game. Just have them play a 7 game series and the rest of the world play for a bronze in their own format could work too.
Interesting question what the impact of better pro hockey would be. I think growth of NCAA D-I hockey circa 2000 is a good comparison. Initially, it was a relative boost to Sweden and Finland, because I don't think Sweden wins silver in 2006 if Rooth and Holst hadn't had the chance to play at UMD. But longer-term, D-I opportunities for Europeans hasn't closed the US-Canada gap, as in the longer run a more attractive NCAA D-I hockey experience has boosted the player pool in US and Canada.In response to Cornholio, hopefully a pro league will fix some it at some point but valid points although I wouldn’t call the tourney a joke.
.
An accurate way to summarize the history is the gap between the winner and the 4th-5th best team has been consistently large and stable over time. You've had brief spells of Sweden being very good in 2006 and Finland being very good in 2019, and some fluctuation in US-Canada performance, like the US underachieving badly in 2006, but all of that is noise in the long-term trends. Meanwhile, you have more movement between 3rd-6th or so as Czechia or Japan fund more and Finland or Sweden fund less. And then Russia dopes massively in Sochi and still can't win bronze, LOL, and is now a pariah state, sigh.
Great information in this post; thanks for sharing it!I feel like people complaining about lack of parity right now should keep in mind Russia...
Yup - another point in the Czechs' favor. I think compared to those three other teams, Peslarova is better than anything they have at this stage. (She's out of this tournament with an injury, and while Skodova is certainly a serviceable goalie she is not Peslarova)Great information in this post; thanks for sharing it!
Looking back quite a ways, it seems like the 3rd best program in the world at any level is often the team that has the most dominant goaltender. Sweden, Finland, Switzerland -- give them somebody in net who will be a Patty Kazmaier finalist at some point and the coaching staffs are savvy enough to figure out how to score a couple goals against the non-North American teams and win bronze.