Re: 2018 Midterms 2: I Need A Drink!
Recount mania! I originally was going to blast the Secretary of State in Arizona but read the explanation for the slow vote count. Apparently they're using 1980's computers to process the ballots which were set up for a time when it was mostly overseas military people mailing them in. Now 75% of the state does mail in up to election day and the system can only process about 70K or so a day. Having said that winning this race would be huge. Apparently Dems won more House seats than the GOP this election in AZ and if they pick up a Senate seat too that reminds me of how Virginia as starting to trend blue 15 years ago.
Regarding Florida, Scott's antics do seem over the top unless he's trying to avoid a hand recount at all costs. If there is truly a 30K undercount of votes in Broward because the machine malfunctioned, only a hand recount will uncover that. If that is indeed the case (an IF at this point) he's screwed. Campaigns tend to know more than what's being reported so I'm sure they've modeled the #'s and know where the risks are. Puts all of his threats in a different context though.
Recount mania! I originally was going to blast the Secretary of State in Arizona but read the explanation for the slow vote count. Apparently they're using 1980's computers to process the ballots which were set up for a time when it was mostly overseas military people mailing them in. Now 75% of the state does mail in up to election day and the system can only process about 70K or so a day. Having said that winning this race would be huge. Apparently Dems won more House seats than the GOP this election in AZ and if they pick up a Senate seat too that reminds me of how Virginia as starting to trend blue 15 years ago.
Regarding Florida, Scott's antics do seem over the top unless he's trying to avoid a hand recount at all costs. If there is truly a 30K undercount of votes in Broward because the machine malfunctioned, only a hand recount will uncover that. If that is indeed the case (an IF at this point) he's screwed. Campaigns tend to know more than what's being reported so I'm sure they've modeled the #'s and know where the risks are. Puts all of his threats in a different context though.