What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

CrossCheck said:
nobody cares, mom....[except you I guess].

A word of advice....All you accomplish by whining and constantly trying to 'correct the record' is make the situation worse for the poor kid. Leave it go, mom...leave it go.
Click to expand...

And yet you care enough to help perpetuate the lie with your whining.

Whatever.
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

schnook said:
And yet you care enough to help perpetuate the lie with your whining.

Whatever.
Click to expand...


I can tell you one 'fact'...the only one on here telling fibs and whining is you, mommy dearest. Good luck back in Canada, sorry the dream ended badly for you. :)
 
CrossCheck said:
I can tell you one 'fact'...the only one on here telling fibs and whining is you, mommy dearest. Good luck back in Canada, sorry the dream ended badly for you. :)
Click to expand...
I have just been alerted that you think you have been talking to a mother. Interesting to go go back and see the sheer lack of respect I guess because you thought you were talking to a woman. I can tell you you weren't. I can't help but wonder if you would have responded differently if you thought it was a man. And I don't care. So move on. For your daughters' sakes, disabuse yourselves of apparently a very dysfunctional group of parents.
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

schnook said:
I have just been alerted that you think you have been talking to a mother. Interesting to go go back and see the sheer lack of respect I guess because you thought you were talking to a woman. I can tell you you weren't. I can't help but wonder if you would have responded differently if you thought it was a man. And I don't care. So move on. For your daughters' sakes, disabuse yourselves of apparently a very dysfunctional group of parents.
Click to expand...


ok Pincott's MOM...whatever you say. LOL

buuubye!!:eek:
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

It's too bad the team doesn't score more goals. Lundberg has played well enough over the years to have many more wins than she has. But wins are tough to come by when your team consistently ranks towards the bottom in goals.
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

rdf8585 said:
It's too bad the team doesn't score more goals. Lundberg has played well enough over the years to have many more wins than she has. But wins are tough to come by when your team consistently ranks towards the bottom in goals.
Click to expand...

Union has a tradition of outstanding goalies and that has tended to mask their lack of success in recruiting skaters who can compete at the D1 level. Strong goalies are sometimes attracted to weak teams because they know that they are going to see a lot of action and are more likely to be credited with single-handed wins. I suspect that Union will win a few games in the ECAC this year and that Lundberg will be the difference.
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

PuckRush said:
I think she's faced more shots already this year than some starting goalies will face this entire season. She just might have the toughest job in all of sports.
Click to expand...
She's not alone. Last year, Lundberg faced 867 shots and Dahl saw another 182. By comparison, Hensley at Lindenwood faced 1,301.
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

ARM said:
She's not alone. Last year, Lundberg faced 867 shots and Dahl saw another 182. By comparison, Hensley at Lindenwood faced 1,301.
Click to expand...

That's a LOT of pucks! Anyone know which current 2014-15 goalies have seen the most shots? A top 5 would be interesting.
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

PuckRush said:
That's a LOT of pucks! Anyone know which current 2014-15 goalies have seen the most shots? A top 5 would be interesting.
Click to expand...

Lundberg - Union, 479 (that is not a typo)
Hensley - Lindenwood, 383
Vaattovaara - UNH, 372
Krichiver - Minn St, 351
Desjardins - Northeastern, 338
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

rdf8585 said:
Lundberg - Union, 479 (that is not a typo)
Hensley - Lindenwood, 383
Vaattovaara - UNH, 372
Krichiver - Minn St, 351
Desjardins - Northeastern, 338
Click to expand...

Thanks for doing that rdf.

That's got to be record pace, right? Shocked that Desjardins/Northeastern is on this list. Is there an easy way to see these stats or did you have to manually grab the numbers?
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

PuckRush said:
Thanks for doing that rdf.

That's got to be record pace, right? Shocked that Desjardins/Northeastern is on this list. Is there an easy way to see these stats or did you have to manually grab the numbers?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure about any records, but you can have a field day with all kinds of numbers here:

http://bit.ly/1t6yyg4
 
Re: 2014-2015 Union Dutchwomen thread

rdf8585 said:
I'm not sure about any records, but you can have a field day with all kinds of numbers here:

http://bit.ly/1t6yyg4
Click to expand...

This website deserves it's own forum.

Just sorted by # of starts.

QU Laden: 9 starts, only 99 shots on net or 11 shots per game. I think that's lowest for starter.
Union Lundgerg: 13 starts, 479 shots. 36.8 shots per game. Highest as you pointed out.

That tells a story.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top