This is starting to get out of control on social media, which is to be expected. I hope Rand comments on it at some point.
Should be fun tomorrow
This is starting to get out of control on social media, which is to be expected. I hope Rand comments on it at some point.
Clip of last night's winning goal by Tim Clifton against Cornell inculding Lowry being a punk in the handshake line.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcTzqUNtJzU&feature=youtu.be&app=desktop
Video removed.![]()
That being said, I also have no problem with Rand trying to get an embellishment call there. Rand's wrong, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't try.
Also, it's become pretty clear that Rand has made just about no friends lately.
Really??? Shouldn't try??
If Michael Peca let's say gets pushed head first into the crossbar in the crease, and. hit's his head on the pipe and is lying on the ice......you think it's OK for the opposing coach to call for "embellishment"????
As for no friends lately...........try substituting the word "ever." Most despised and reviled coach in the league. Big Mike doesn't have many fans but compared to Pecknold he is a paragon of virtue.
Really??? Shouldn't try??
If Michael Peca let's say gets pushed head first into the crossbar in the crease, and. hit's his head on the pipe and is lying on the ice......you think it's OK for the opposing coach to call for "embellishment"????
As for no friends lately...........try substituting the word "ever." Most despised and reviled coach in the league. Big Mike doesn't have many fans but compared to Pecknold he is a paragon of virtue.
I have certainly gotten that sense in the now six years that I have followed this league. But you know what, I don't really care. From everything that I have read in the past, mainly on this site, about other teams/fans views of Rand and this program in our conference, none seem too positive. I could be off base, but it just seems like the Ivies and some of the great academic universities in this conference feel like Quinnipiac does not fit the mold.
That is a whole different argument, however. I am quite happy with Rand as this program's head coach. Let the outsiders bicker and moan.
Rand is responsible for his team, and his team only. As is the other coach. Do I like it? As I said above, I don't. But he's well within his rights. You'd want your coach defending your players, too.
Again, I don't care how hated he is. The guy wins. Twenty-win seasons every single year. He's not here to make friends, he's here to win. He's really good at winning.
You couldn't be more wrong. 99% of the players he coaches will go on to something other than hockey. He is part of an academic institution of higher learning. He is an example for his University and his players. You are indeed fortunate to have a winning program. But....I would credit more to the $$$ spent, the facility, the marketing of the program and the advantages that gives to recruiting......rather than to Mr. Personality.
Those assets aside....sooner or later, his personality will impact recruiting.
Hahaha I was bout to say the same thing. The kids obviously like him and as long as he is internally liked, I could care less what the rest of the ECAC thinks.He has been in Hamden 20 years. He is still recruiting at a high level. Doesn't look like his personality is hurting them.
USCHO.com @USCHO 9m9 minutes ago
ECAC Hockey suspends Cornell coach Mike Schafer one game for postgame conduct vs. Quinnipiac on Saturday. He'll miss Friday vs. Clarkson.
You couldn't be more wrong. 99% of the players he coaches will go on to something other than hockey. He is part of an academic institution of higher learning. He is an example for his University and his players. You are indeed fortunate to have a winning program. But....I would credit more to the $$$ spent, the facility, the marketing of the program and the advantages that gives to recruiting......rather than to Mr. Personality.
Those assets aside....sooner or later, his personality will impact recruiting.
Why is that? Because coaches are supposed to set good examples and be ambassadors for their schools? Or was it just about winning? I'm so confused...Deserved suspension
Why is that? Because coaches are supposed to set good examples and be ambassadors for their schools? Or was it just about winning? I'm so confused...