What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

IceIsNice

Huh? Whoopie Pies? WHERE???
One hour til puck drop.... I'll take the Maple Leafs by 9.

Any other prognosticators dare venture a guess?
 
Re: 2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

One hour til puck drop.... I'll take the Maple Leafs by 9.

Any other prognosticators dare venture a guess?

if only there were already a 2010 winter olympics thread..oh wait
 
Re: 2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

Look, this is a one game, one hour, focused thread.... why cloud the other with a bunch of silly guesses? I thought it better to have the silliness happen here and be done with.
 
Re: 2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

Look, this is a one game, one hour, focused thread.... why cloud the other with a bunch of silly guesses? I thought it better to have the silliness happen here and be done with.
In that case, I'll go with Switzerland winning by a score of 82-0.
 
Re: 2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

okay fine, dumb idea.....SORRY!
 
Re: 2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

ridiculous game

I didn't think of it this way. Sure, the Swiss were clearly outmatched, but between Schelling's ability to give them a chance, and the never say never effort the Swiss players maintained throughout the game, I didn't think it was that bad.

The Swiss had some pretty decent scoring chances that either just missed or were saved. Maybe not enough to threaten the outcome, but as I watched the game, I couldn't help but wonder what that Swiss team would look like if they had the benefit of centralization.

Realiastically, if the top two teams centralize, and the teams that have players with potential to build their programs into contention don't, they'll still never be on a level playing field meeting two weeks prior to the Games to prepare.
 
Cupcake...USA not CANADA :D

Cupcake...USA not CANADA :D

When your the reigning Gold Medal Champs you get the luxury of going into the cupcake group. :rolleyes:

I believe the groupings are based on rankings after last years Worlds as opposed to the results at the Olympics four years ago. This means the Yanks have on paper more of a cup cake schedule than the Canucks. :( :D
 
Last edited:
Re: 2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

When your the reigning Gold Medal Champs you get the luxury of going into the cupcake group. :rolleyes:

If that's the cupcake group, the US must be in the Whoopie Pie group!

I mean really, is it really going to make any difference?
 
Re: 2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

Who put Canada in this cupcake group? :rolleyes:

Local broadcasters in the great "but less white than Washington DC" North were commenting that this was embarassing for Womens hockey. These commentators know the mens game in detail to the Nth degree but pay little to no atttention to the Womens game, except during the Olympics. :mad: :( :mad:
 
Last edited:
Re: 2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

Realiastically, if the top two teams centralize, and the teams that have players with potential to build their programs into contention don't, they'll still never be on a level playing field meeting two weeks prior to the Games to prepare.
If we assume that Sweden and Finland are roughly of the same caliber, than these games may shed some light on the value of centralizing (Sweden) versus not (Finland.)

I believe the groupings are based on rankings after last years Worlds as opposed to the results at the Olympics four years ago. This means the Yanks have on paper more of a cup cake schedule than the Canucks. :( :D
No, Canada was the #1 seed. The rankings were based on some cummulative results for a n-month period that did not include the 2009 Worlds. The US is the #1 ranked team today, but the rankings for the Olympics were set longer ago.
 
Re: 2010 Winter Olympics - Canada vs. Switzerland; Canada by _____ ?

If we assume that Sweden and Finland are roughly of the same caliber, than these games may shed some light on the value of centralizing (Sweden) versus not (Finland.)

No, Canada was the #1 seed. The rankings were based on some cummulative results for a n-month period that did not include the 2009 Worlds. The US is the #1 ranked team today, but the rankings for the Olympics were set longer ago.

OK. I stand corrected. Strange that the Canucks were still ranked no 1, as the US also won worlds in 2008. So this is not like worlds were seedings are based on the previous years results in the event. (or at least that is the way it used to be).
 
Back
Top