What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

jerphisch said:
But they love them some St. Ronnie, amiright?
Click to expand...

One does because he was a kid when Ronnie was President so he idolized him. (as many kids did the President) The other one is hit or miss on him.

You know it isnt like it was just hardliners that loved Reagan...
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Handyman said:
This is why every Republican I know hates Dubya and loathes Trump
Click to expand...

I wish I knew the Republicans you do. Every Republican I know is OK with Dubya and is OK with Dump for the judges.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Kepler said:
I wish I knew the Republicans you do. Every Republican I know is OK with Dubya and is OK with Dump for the judges.
Click to expand...

Me too. They all love Dump. Won't except any criticism of him no matter how measured.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

If he wins, he should be required to wear his Boss Hogg outfit at all times in the Capitol.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

French Rage said:
I, uh, don't think it's legal to intimidate witnesses: https://twitter.com/mattgaetz/status/1100503846386835456
Click to expand...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hey <a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelCohen212?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MichaelCohen212</a> - Do your wife & father-in-law know about your girlfriends? Maybe tonight would be a good time for that chat. I wonder if she’ll remain faithful when you’re in prison. She’s about to learn a lot...</p>— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattgaetz/status/1100503846386835456?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Holy ****ing ****. He should be thrown in jail.

Talking about this on MSNBC now. Federal Crime..
 
French Rage said:
I, uh, don't think it's legal to intimidate witnesses: https://twitter.com/mattgaetz/status/1100503846386835456
Click to expand...

That first reply tho... *chefs kiss*

*edit* This one:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">oh man you mean the dude who helped pay off the porn stars the president was nailing behind his third wife’s back while she was at home with a new baby did not have a firm commitment to monogamy well **** I never</p>— kilgore trout (@KT_So_It_Goes) <a href="https://twitter.com/KT_So_It_Goes/status/1100505796788531202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Last edited:
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

Al the replies that mention Matt’s own arrests are quite good too
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

I agree with Amy. 100%.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This national emergency order is unconstitutional. <a href="https://t.co/9W4oQnX0qr">https://t.co/9W4oQnX0qr</a></p>— Amy Klobuchar (@amyklobuchar) <a href="https://twitter.com/amyklobuchar/status/1100519777628504065?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

aparch said:
That first reply tho... *chefs kiss*

*edit* This one:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">oh man you mean the dude who helped pay off the porn stars the president was nailing behind his third wife’s back while she was at home with a new baby did not have a firm commitment to monogamy well **** I never</p>— kilgore trout (@KT_So_It_Goes) <a href="https://twitter.com/KT_So_It_Goes/status/1100505796788531202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

I'd never seen the image of a human centipede with fox in front followed by trump and a magayte at the rear, that won the day for me.
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

French Rage said:
I, uh, don't think it's legal to intimidate witnesses: https://twitter.com/mattgaetz/status/1100503846386835456
Click to expand...

Oh dear god :rofl:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"> <a href="https://t.co/uKLlsEjTlg">pic.twitter.com/uKLlsEjTlg</a></p>— Adam Best (@adamcbest) <a href="https://twitter.com/adamcbest/status/1100517802044215297?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: 116th Congress: Episode 1 - Trial by Fire

dxmnkd316 said:
Oh dear god :rofl:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"> <a href="https://t.co/uKLlsEjTlg">pic.twitter.com/uKLlsEjTlg</a></p>— Adam Best (@adamcbest) <a href="https://twitter.com/adamcbest/status/1100517802044215297?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

Wow. That is all sorts of ****ed up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top