What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

It's almost unbelievable how ****ing stupid the electorate is.

Apparently, no matter how much money from outside your state is used to fund a campaign for the House of Representatives, voters still prefer that the candidate at least live in their district....
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Apparently, no matter how much money from outside your state is used to fund a campaign for the House of Representatives, voters still prefer that the candidate at least live in their district....

There was a lot of outside money for both sides. And Ossoff did grow up in the district. But I agree, don't give them a freebie like that.

Getting within 6% in a district that is R +25 is good, but we had a lot of advantages here as solid red districts go: highly educated and Trump only won there by 1.

We need to put up wins at some point, not just gallant efforts. Josh Marshall said it well, talking about the 4 special elections we have lost since the 2016 general:

If you take the average Democratic over-performance in these districts and apply it to the entire House, Democrats are quite likely to take the House next year. What I take from this is that Republicans are struggling under Trump and Democrats are energized. But Democrats need to keep refining both their message and improving their electoral infrastructure. The most challenging takeaway I take from these races for Democrats is that even though Republicans have lost substantial ground and are operating in a tough environment they’ve nevertheless been able to mobilize money and partisan affiliation to hold on in tight races. That can’t be ignored. It’s also very significant.

What Democrats need to resist at all costs is the temperamental inclination to fall into spasms of self-loathing over this defeat – specifically, the idea that there’s something fundamentally wrong with the party because of this loss. I saw one Democrat on Twitter tonight ask if Ossoff’s loss didn’t mean “the Democratic party apparatus needs a total overhaul on every single level?”

Maybe the Democrats do need a fundamental overhaul. But doing 10 to 15 points better than a House candidate has done in this district since the 1970s simply isn’t evidence for that. There’s also a toxic desire on the part of many to use this painful defeat as an opening to relitigate intra-party grievances. Losing is hard. Taking a loss and getting up the next day to keep fighting to get to the next level takes endurance and guts. Many cannot resist the temptation to trade that sting for a toxic self-validation. All I can say to that is that parties build majorities by finding ways to unite competing factions over common interests and goals – something Donald Trump should help with a lot. They almost never get there when they are locked in internecine struggle or when either faction thinks it can or does destroy the other. That’s just not how it works.

This is a big disappointment. But remember, by any objective measure these races show a Democratic party resurgent and a GOP on the ropes. These seats came open because they were vacated by people Trump picked for cabinet appointments. They got those picks because they came from safe seats. They are by no means a cross section of House seats. The thing to do is learn what we can from coming up just short and move on to the next fight. No one should expect any of this to be easy.
 
Last edited:
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Apparently, no matter how much money from outside your state is used to fund a campaign for the House of Representatives, voters still prefer that the candidate at least live in their district....

Fine. Good for them. They've just validated the Republican agenda. And this is supposed to be one of the highest college graduate districts in the country.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Well plenty of stupid people went to college. ;)
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Apparently, no matter how much money from outside your state is used to fund a campaign for the House of Representatives, voters still prefer that the candidate at least live in their district....

Bruce Poliquin, slimeball representing Maine's second district didn't live in the district until after he was elected. He "grew up" in the second district, but moved away long ago. He lived in a multi-million dollar oceanfront compound in southern Maine and promised to buy a home in the district if he won. Well he did. I doubt he has slept very many nights in that house.
 
Last edited:
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Scalise shooting is Obama's Fault. Thanks Obama.

(CNN)Republican Rep. Steve King said Wednesday he partly blames former president Barack Obama for the divided political climate that he argues led to the shooting of House Majority Whip and three others on a baseball field in Alexandria, Virginia.
"I do want to put some of this at the feet of Barack Obama," the Iowa congressman said in an interview with Simon Conway on WHO Iowa radio. "He contributed mightily to dividing us. He focused on our differences rather than our things that unify us. And this is some of the fruits of that labor."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/15/politics/kfile-steve-king-obama-blame/index.html
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Which is greater: the number of days Steve King has been in Congress without authoring a bill or the population of the city he lives in?
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Mountain Dew is all over my screen. Thanks.

:D

We need to get you on coffee instead. SPeaking of...

Kepler, how is the great coffee experiment going?

Kepler said:
Re: MOVIES: New Ideas Welcome!

dxmnkd316 said:
HATED it. I had to choke it down a sip at a time. Honestly. The first week I didn't even finish half my cup.
That's actually amazing that you were able to rewire your tastes. I'm going to take a shot at it, so if you are lying I will hunt you down and gut you like a fish.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Kepler, how is the great coffee experiment going?

It's been on hold. There was no way I was going through the Housing Crisis without my established caffeine delivery system.

But thanks for reminding me to take it up again. Dr. Mrs. has a Keurig and we live near a Starbucks now, so I am guardedly hopeful.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

Used to be blue. It's now gone, forever.

We'll see. Iowa's a weird state in that the left it does have is very liberal. It's a state with no middle. That may actually help when the country as a whole realizes Republican ideas are horse hockey.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

We'll see. Iowa's a weird state in that the left it does have is very liberal. It's a state with no middle. That may actually help when the country as a whole realizes Republican ideas are horse hockey.

We'll see. Wisconsin's gone too.
 
Re: 115th Congress. In Bridge, Can Hearts be Trumped? In Spades!

We'll see. Wisconsin's gone too.

Wisconsin has a very strong progressive tradition, and our liberals are also very liberal, so I have to believe we can come back.

But there's that paradox: The likes of Bob Lafollette on one hand:

As governor, La Follette championed numerous progressive reforms, including the first workers' compensation system, railroad rate reform, direct legislation, municipal home rule, open government, the minimum wage, non-partisan elections, the open primary system, direct election of U.S. Senators, women's suffrage, and progressive taxation. He created an atmosphere of close collaboration between the state government and the University of Wisconsin in the development of progressive policy, which became known as the Wisconsin Idea. The goals of his policy included the recall, referendum, direct primary, and initiative. All of these were aimed at giving citizens a more direct role in government.

The Wisconsin Idea promoted the idea of grounding legislation on thorough research and expert involvement. To implement this program, La Follette began working with University of Wisconsin–Madison faculty. This made Wisconsin a "laboratory for democracy" and "the most important state for the development of progressive legislation".[2] As governor, La Follette signed legislation that created the Wisconsin Legislative Reference Library (now Bureau) to ensure that a research agency would be available for the development of legislation.


And Joe McCarthy and Scott Walker on the other.

no comment
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top