USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Wisconsin Women's Hockey 2026-27
- Thread starter robertearle
- Start date
ARM
Fan of chipmunk-like mascots.
Thought this belonged in a UW thread, not PWHL at this point.
These are all people who I respect a ton.
Jessie Vetter - It's hard to win hockey games when you can't score. Particularly in the postseason, Vetter didn't give up goals. She made playing goalie look easy, like anybody should be able to do it. Always in the right place, always stopping the puck, and always cool while doing it.
Meghan Duggan - One time I watched UW and Mercyhurst play in St. Cloud, in a game matching two seniors named Meghan. Agosta was a great player, who elevated the Lakers from a team you didn't want to play in the NCAAs to a legitimate contender. Duggan put on a clinic of all the different types of plays that an elite player can make to help her team win a game. Plays like that were the reason that it was hard to argue with her Kazmaier win.
Hilary Knight - You could never relax when watching her Wisconsin teams play, because she was capable of turning a game so quickly. Didn't need the puck on her stick for long, and she could score in so many different ways.
Honorable mention: Carla MacLeod. Played before UW achieved the kind of success that they would in later years, but carried the banner for the early Badger teams in terms of being hard to play against.
There are likely recent Badgers who are as good or better. However, I've watched them far less, and these days, you don't have to be that good to wreck Minnesota's dreams.
Note that you could ask three other people this question, they could each list three different players, you'd wind up with a dozen Badgers, and maybe nobody is wrong. A lot of talent has passed through Madison.
These are all people who I respect a ton.
Jessie Vetter - It's hard to win hockey games when you can't score. Particularly in the postseason, Vetter didn't give up goals. She made playing goalie look easy, like anybody should be able to do it. Always in the right place, always stopping the puck, and always cool while doing it.
Meghan Duggan - One time I watched UW and Mercyhurst play in St. Cloud, in a game matching two seniors named Meghan. Agosta was a great player, who elevated the Lakers from a team you didn't want to play in the NCAAs to a legitimate contender. Duggan put on a clinic of all the different types of plays that an elite player can make to help her team win a game. Plays like that were the reason that it was hard to argue with her Kazmaier win.
Hilary Knight - You could never relax when watching her Wisconsin teams play, because she was capable of turning a game so quickly. Didn't need the puck on her stick for long, and she could score in so many different ways.
Honorable mention: Carla MacLeod. Played before UW achieved the kind of success that they would in later years, but carried the banner for the early Badger teams in terms of being hard to play against.
There are likely recent Badgers who are as good or better. However, I've watched them far less, and these days, you don't have to be that good to wreck Minnesota's dreams.
Ooftah
Active member
I'm not sure what to make of the Pennsylvania team sponsored by that fracking czar having more players picked in the PWHL draft than Wisconsin. Admittedly, all five UW players were picked in the first round, including - thank goodness - Vivian Jungels.
Personally, I'll take quality over quantity any day of the week. In this case, Wisconsin had plenty of both.
Go, Badgers!
Personally, I'll take quality over quantity any day of the week. In this case, Wisconsin had plenty of both.
Go, Badgers!
robertearle
Well-known member
The NCAA "five in five" change to eligibility has been approved.
Those having used a fourth year of eligibility during the 2025-26 school year are NOT eligible for a fifth year. But those with eligibility remaining for the 2026-27 school year and beyond will be able to compete in a fifth year, so long as the "five year window" has not otherwise run out. The "five-year window" begins upon high school graduation or the student's 19th birthday, whichever occurs first (known as the 'age-based" model for eligibility).
So those Badgers who would otherwise be entering their final year of eligibility this coming year - McNaughton, Kelly Gorbatenko, etal - now have two years of eligibility remaining. On the other hand, Nicole and Rachel Gorbatenko will still have only four year remaining, having taken a "redshirt" year in 2025-26, which "burned" a year of their five years under the "age-based model".
One of the 'targets" of the new rule was foreign players who come to the USA as 20 or 21 year old freshmen. So next up is checking on Sapovalivova's and Lopusanova's birthdates.
------------
I think Sapo will have another four years. Lopusanova should be eligible for the full five years.
Those having used a fourth year of eligibility during the 2025-26 school year are NOT eligible for a fifth year. But those with eligibility remaining for the 2026-27 school year and beyond will be able to compete in a fifth year, so long as the "five year window" has not otherwise run out. The "five-year window" begins upon high school graduation or the student's 19th birthday, whichever occurs first (known as the 'age-based" model for eligibility).
So those Badgers who would otherwise be entering their final year of eligibility this coming year - McNaughton, Kelly Gorbatenko, etal - now have two years of eligibility remaining. On the other hand, Nicole and Rachel Gorbatenko will still have only four year remaining, having taken a "redshirt" year in 2025-26, which "burned" a year of their five years under the "age-based model".
One of the 'targets" of the new rule was foreign players who come to the USA as 20 or 21 year old freshmen. So next up is checking on Sapovalivova's and Lopusanova's birthdates.
------------
I think Sapo will have another four years. Lopusanova should be eligible for the full five years.
eastcoastgopher
Active member
Entering
Sapovalivova is 20. Lopusanova, who attended high school in the US, is 18.
robertearle
Well-known member
Per Todd Milewski. Badger women hockey will be at the Brewers game tonight; first pitch, Sausage Race, etc.
And they got a good one: Misiorowski vs the Cubs. I assume the Gorbatenkos are Cub fans, but we'll try to not hold that against them.
And they got a good one: Misiorowski vs the Cubs. I assume the Gorbatenkos are Cub fans, but we'll try to not hold that against them.
Timothy A
Let's go RED!
The flying Cardinal W trumps all in my book. I love the 3 starters for the series, let's stick it to them.
TDM had an article up about Johnson joining the family. She went into the portal blind and UW gave her a call. I wonder if she's on a full scholarship or a partial on the in-state tuition plan.