I like this guy. Seems to be an entrepreneur who understands how to make things work.
Now he's done this
I'm sure he's going to have his share of failures, but if I was an investor, I think he'd be worth a few dollars.
He's done some good stuff. This hand-waving business? Pretty much just hand waving, as far as I'm concerned. 3-D design will never be the domain of a "layman" or "idea guy," regardless of the interface. I don't see that this will allow for a major increase in the speed that competent designers can achieve in designing parts - there are already numerous interface tools (joysticks, spaceballs, etc) that already allow the designer to interact with 3D models rapidly and intuitively.
And don't get me started on hyperloop...
Give me 14 pipe cleaners and 3 rolls of duct tape, and I’ll have it running as bad as new.
That will never work. Read A City On Mars. The entire concept is literal BS.Hey, I wanted to believe because of his focus on making humanity multi-planet. I still think that is right. All our eggs are in perilous shape right now.
That will never work. Read A City On Mars. The entire concept is literal BS.
The idea isn't trash. The idea that it is even close to becoming reality is trash.
I did a very cursory analysis (it's what I do for a living - can't help it) of what it would cost to put a single, small bulldozer on the moon (I think it was 20,000 lbs). I couldn't find it just now, but I recall that it was well north of $100M - for just the transportation costs for just one bulldozer.That will never work. Read A City On Mars. The entire concept is literal BS.
Colonizing space is not happening...certainly not in time to save humanity from Mother Nature. Maybe if we had spent the past 50 years really putting effort into it we might be at step 1...but we aren't even close. We aren't even close to being able to put a man on Mars let alone colonizing space. I am not sure I trust NASA to put people back on the moon at this point.Musk's concepts are trash, but the idea of colonizing space is not at all.
The distance between habitable worlds is a blessing. To get to the technology level to make the jump we will need to weed out the beast from our nature. We aren't even close yet. But consider: we have been doing serious and methodical science only since about 1600. We have come a very long way in a very short time.
Humanity contains multitudes, and among each lot of 100 randomly selected ass clowns there is at least 1 person with a brain and a soul, and another 9 worth talking to and working with. A 10% hit rate for humans out of animals gives us upwards of a billion worldwide. That's a lot of FTE.
We can learn to protect ourselves from the Morlocks. They are addicted to their iPacifiers, their drugs, their perpetual adolesence, their yay/boo politics, and their consumerism. Let them chase their tails and destroy each other while we reach the stars.
If there is even one failure of an effort to colonize...not even a death but just an engine failure or an Apollo 13 successful failure...it would like bankrupt the whole operation.I did a very cursory analysis (it's what I do for a living - can't help it) of what it would cost to put a single, small bulldozer on the moon (I think it was 20,000 lbs). I couldn't find it just now, but I recall that it was well north of $100M - for just the transportation costs for just one bulldozer.
A viable colony on mars (i.e. with enough people to breed future generations of martians without genetic issues) would consume the GDP of the earth for the next 3 decades - maybe more.
Yeah, the current $/$ is insane, but I suspect like solar their will be breakthroughs in technology that cause it drop to a uhhh more “economical” (lacking a better term, because it will never be cheap without Heisenberg Uncertainty Compensators).I did a very cursory analysis (it's what I do for a living - can't help it) of what it would cost to put a single, small bulldozer on the moon (I think it was 20,000 lbs). I couldn't find it just now, but I recall that it was well north of $100M - for just the transportation costs for just one bulldozer.
A viable colony on mars (i.e. with enough people to breed future generations of martians without genetic issues) would consume the GDP of the earth for the next 3 decades - maybe more.