I'm not sure who has a bigger unlike-ability score, Muzzy or Little Miss Sassy Pants.Putting this out there now: if it comes down to Minn vs Ohio St tomorrow, I'll be rooting for Ohio State. I CAN NOT root for a team with Abbey Murphy on it. As insufferable as the Buckeye fans are and would be, I just cannot.
He pretty much has to take her side, you aren't going to dress down the C.Someone needs to talk some sense into Murphy. It reflects poorly on frost at a certain point .
He pretty much has to take her side, you aren't going to dress down the C.
It really messes with the games. Opposing players target her like crazy. She dives constantly. When she gets hit and lays on the ice you never know if she’s really hurt or not. Refs don’t know how to call the games.In some programs a player like that wouldn’t wear the C. She can be wildly entertaining but some of her stuff is tough to watch. I’m sure some of her teammates get sick of it. Also in most programs wearing the C means being held to a higher standard than everyone else.
How do you mean he needs her? Just that she keeps the team in the top 4 and that’s enough?It really messes with the games. Opposing players target her like crazy. She dives constantly. When she gets hit and lays on the ice you never know if she’s really hurt or not. Refs don’t know how to call the games.
But Frost needs her.
I just went to ESPN+ to watch the hit everyone's talking about, and damn...that was just straight-up dirty. Murphy came from a long way out just to do Harvey like that, and it should have been the end of Murphy's night. At least when Harvey got her back, there was an actual play for the puck involved.Fuck Abbey Murphy!
Yes, that is what I meant. And top 4 is not much of an accomplishment for a Minnesota coach. Hopefully Frost is feeling some heat anyway.How do you mean he needs her? Just that she keeps the team in the top 4 and that’s enough?
I see what I think is backward motion on shootout shots so often, I really don't know what's allowed and what isn't. Yeah, she maybe pulled back a bit. but I think I see that a lot.Is that a legal goal? I looked at it several times, and I'm not sure. The puck must be kept in motion towards the goal line. If they used such a tight definition of covering a puck (called on replay, not live, so they figure it is clear and obvious), then I don't think that puck was moving toward the goal line before she shot it.
Doesn't matter now; 3-3.