Some US fans have vocalized what they deserve is coverage from a knowledgeable mainstream tv US media.
We have had similar discussions on the men's threads. It can be difficult for many people to accept, but the reality is that hockey in general is still a "niche" sport in the US. College even moreso. Every year there are complaints about the game times for the playoffs, TV coverage, etc. They show lacrosse, swimming, water polo and softball before hockey. We sometimes have to wait for an overtime game in some other sport until they join the hockey game midway through the first period (or later). Yeah, it's frustrating, but it is what it is. The reality is we're lucky they cover it at all. I spent my entire life in Massachusetts before we moved (semi-retired) to South Carolina two years ago. They don't even know what ice is here. The only reason SOME people even know what hockey is would be because the Hartford Whalers moved to Raleigh, NC, twenty-three years ago. College hockey, forget it. And women's hockey is basically an extension of college/Olympic, because, as many have pointed out, there is no "NHL equivalent" league here for women, so the players are basically amateurs. The network is not going to show something that 5,000 will be watching. They would rather show a Division III basketball game that, maybe, 1,000,000 are watching, because it's all about advertising and ratings.
So, the people that said that about the coverage simply don't understand the economic reality behind the decision. In Canada, it's hockey first and everything else a distant tenth. And I know the argument that the NHL has expanded into all of these other markets in the U.S. The problem is, you can't play the game on the frozen ponds of Florida (I'm NOT being sarcastic) or Arizona. Becuase THAT is how you truly learn to love a sport We played baseball EVERY DAY after school for probably ten years. You become good at something because you LOVE it and you PRACTICE every day. I don't mean "organized" practice. We watched and mimicked the pros. I could imitate any Red Sox player's swing, throw or style. It becomes second nature. The reason that Canada has more World Championships than anyone else is because the game is second-nature to them. One can argue all they want, "Well, they have rinks in Texas, you know." Yeah, so what? So your parents pay $20/day so you can attend a "practice" is some rink. Then what? You have to wait until next week's practice to get on ice. And we know how those things go; the "good" players get all the ice team and the rest sit and watch. My grandmother had a pond behind our house. THAT'S where I learned to skate...not in some rink. THAT'S why the Canadians are good. You play pickup games and you learn moves and fundamentals in real time and speed that some "drill" alone can't teach you.
I saw Bobby Orr and Gordie Howe play in old Boston Garden. When you have a sixty-year perspective it becomes more clear. I was at Game 4 of the 1977 Stanley Cup at the Garden, when that Canadiens team, maybe the greatest team of all time, swept the Bruins and paraded around the ice with the cup. It was amazing....Guy LaFleur, Ken Dryden, Jacquest Laperriere, Serge Savard, Henri Richard, Yvan Cornoyer, and coached by Scotty Bowman. You get a real sense of how deep the game is from their perspective.
The U.S. announcers were the same way about basketball. In the '72 Olympics, the United States had a record of 63-0 going into the Gold Medal game against the Soviet Union. It was a close game (you can look up the details, I won't go into it too deeply), and when Doug Collins sunk two free throws with three seconds left, the U.S. took a 50-49 lead. Subsequently, the Soviets threw the ball in and failed to score. But wait, the horn went off and they were "given another chance." This time they threw the ball the length of the court and Alexander Belov laid it in, winning the game 51-49. It was clearly a fix; the game should have been over twice before. The U.S. announcers went crazy.
All of this indicates how one's actions change depending upon your viewpoint and how important something is deemed to be.
Anyway, I'm happy that your little girl DID see it. We do what we love and are fortunate to have the opportunity to do so. But hockey is never going to be a "mainstream" sport in this country, and we have to accept that. Or not. There are additional reasons, but I don't want to get into controversial stuff here, since we are celebrating a fantastic game (and outcome). :smiley (as I have said on the other thread, I will keep literally typing out "smiley" until they allow us to once again use emojis)