What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UNH Men's Hockey 2022 Off Season Thread- Goodbye Lake Whitt!

So.Will Margel (18-1-3-4)--------Sr.Harrison Blaisdell-(25-2-6-8)------So.Robert Cronin (30-7-5-12)
So.Liam Devlin-(34-9-7-16)-----Fr.Stiven Sardarian--(NA)-------------Fr.Kristap Skrastins (NA)
Fr.Cy Leclerc-(NA)----------------Sr.Chase Stevenson-(33-4-1-5)------Fr.John Evans (NA)
Fr.Jake Dunlap-(NA)--------------Fr.Morgan Winters-(NA)---------------Jr.Nick Cafarelli (15-3-4-7)
Jr.Carsen Richels-(13-0-0-0)-----Jr.Cam Gendron-(19-1-1-2)-----------So.Conor Lovett
So.Connor Sweeney-(22-0-0-0)--Sr.Joe Hankinson (1-0-0-0)


Sr.Kalle Eriksson-(32-0-12-12)----So.Colton Huard (28-6-10-16)
So.Alex Gagne-(33-1-7-8)---------Jr.Luke Reid 34-3-5-8)
Fr.Nick Ardanaz-(NA)---------------Fr.Damien Carfagna (NA)
Jr.Nikolai Jenson-(30-1-5-6)-------Fr.Cade Penney

Fr.Tyler Muszelik----------Sr.David Fessenden------------Jr.Jeremy Forman
 
So.Will Margel (18-1-3-4)--------Sr.Harrison Blaisdell-(25-2-6-8)------So.Robert Cronin (30-7-5-12)
So.Liam Devlin-(34-9-7-16)-----Fr.Stiven Sardarian--(NA)-------------Fr.Kristap Skrastins (NA)
Fr.Cy Leclerc-(NA)----------------Sr.Chase Stevenson-(33-4-1-5)------Fr.John Evans (NA)
Fr.Jake Dunlap-(NA)--------------Fr.Morgan Winters-(NA)---------------Jr.Nick Cafarelli (15-3-4-7)
Jr.Carsen Richels-(13-0-0-0)-----Jr.Cam Gendron-(19-1-1-2)-----------So.Conor Lovett
So.Connor Sweeney-(22-0-0-0)--Sr.Joe Hankinson (1-0-0-0)


Sr.Kalle Eriksson-(32-0-12-12)----So.Colton Huard (28-6-10-16)
So.Alex Gagne-(33-1-7-8)---------Jr.Luke Reid 34-3-5-8)
Fr.Nick Ardanaz-(NA)---------------Fr.Damien Carfagna (NA)
Jr.Nikolai Jenson-(30-1-5-6)-------Fr.Cade Penney

Fr.Tyler Muszelik----------Sr.David Fessenden------------Jr.Jeremy Forman

What about Lucas Hermann? Am I missing something?
 
Just a few points….

1. Darius was spot on in the other thread. Fixing the cooling system is a “time is of the essence” project. Tight timeframes to get ‘er done.
2. Norbert was spot-on as well. The two need to go hand-in-hand to maximize the economies of scope and minimize the investment to complete the project. Current hope is to complete the project by 9/1.
3. The decision to move to 90 (vs. 85) had nothing to do with sight lines, and everything to do with long-term trends as evidenced by a general move towards a 90-foot surface or the “hybridized” models (think 92.5) being considered worldwide. As one poster mentioned, Agganis built to 90, NU shrunk to 90, and I’ll add that Mariucci is either going to 92.5 or has already done so. Apparently, the IIHF is considering 90 or hybridized sheets, and there are even some in the NHL who’d like to see the sheet grow to meet to game (I think Brian Burke was trying to lead the charge there. Won’t happen anytime soon given the revenue hit, methinks).
4. Changing the bowl would double the price tag. Given the cost of the potential guts renovation, money is probably better directed toward that in order to help turn this program around.
5. I know that they are going to work with any STH who feels their experience is impacted by the 5’ change to get to an agreeable solution. It’s not lost that this will change the experience.

That’s what I know and can share.
 
Sean when you get a minute do share your insights
Here are my thoughts/observations about the report:

The report is brutal in its description of the existing refrigeration plant and further notes the HVAC system’s airflow in the rink appears to be an issue. It reflect poorly on those who originally signed off on both systems. The report also notes that Olympic size ice sheets are not normal for college hockey, but here I give UNH a pass, as when the Whitt was designed and built the NCAA rules (from at least 1987 through 2004) called for 200' x 100' rinks.

In 2010 BU replaced the slab at Walter Brown Arena, upgraded the refrigeration plant, the HVAC system and installed A/C. I stopped by one day when the old slab was removed and the new slab wasn’t yet poured. It was something to see dirt/sand instead of concrete where the rink should be. I think the best option for UNH would be to replace the existing slab at the current elevation and then redo the stands to create optimal site lines.

The seating sight lines I find quite interesting, as I measured the Whitt’s riser depth and height to compare with Agganis when it opened. Agganis and the Whitt have the same riser depth, 33”, but Agganis goes up 18?” each row, while the Whitt goes up just 15” (I measured 14?”) each row. I much prefer the elevation and sight lines I have at Agganis to most other Hockey East rinks because of the higher rise between rows. The optimal sight lines shown in the report would have a 21” rise between rows, even more than Agganis’ 18?”. As I like the elevation and sight lines at Agganis I am for this change.

Agganis allows full size trucks and busses directly into the arena, so I’m a bit surprised the Whitt doesn’t. It makes a lot of sense to allow trucks and busses direct access into the building so I’m not sure why it wasn’t originally built to allow it.

Agganis has wasted space as well, but it was/is planned to be the women’s locker room and the athletic offices someday. BU built out the visitor side with a large visitor locker room, as well as additional locker rooms at the end so that you can currently have four teams in the building. It looks like the Whitt could handle four teams, but adding a visitor locker room on the visitor side does make sense.

The cost seems very reasonable at about $9 million for all the renovations. Then again, I'm basing that against the cost of Agganis, the new ASU multipurpose arena and the new SHU multipurpose arena.

Sean
 
Here are my thoughts/observations about the report:
The report is brutal in its description of the existing refrigeration plant and further notes the HVAC system's airflow in the rink appears to be an issue. It reflect poorly on those who originally signed off on both systems. The report also notes that Olympic size ice sheets are not normal for college hockey, but here I give UNH a pass, as when the Whitt was designed and built the NCAA rules (from at least 1987 through 2004) called for 200' x 100' rinks.

...

The seating sight lines I find quite interesting, as I measured the Whitt's riser depth and height to compare with Agganis when it opened. Agganis and the Whitt have the same riser depth, 33”, but Agganis goes up 18?” each row, while the Whitt goes up just 15” (I measured 14?”) each row. I much prefer the elevation and sight lines I have at Agganis to most other Hockey East rinks because of the higher rise between rows. The optimal sight lines shown in the report would have a 21” rise between rows, even more than Agganis’ 18?”. As I like the elevation and sight lines at Agganis I am for this change.

Sean

Best feature of Agganis by far is the vertical height of the seating bowl. I thought I remembered reading somewhere when it was under construction that Jack Parker wanted the effect to be that of the original Boston Garden (higher/narrower) than the new building (wider/shallower?). If that's what they were going for, they nailed it. Best "new" building in HEA by a longshot.
 
Here are my thoughts/observations about the report:

The report is brutal in its description of the existing refrigeration plant and further notes the HVAC system’s airflow in the rink appears to be an issue. It reflect poorly on those who originally signed off on both systems. The report also notes that Olympic size ice sheets are not normal for college hockey, but here I give UNH a pass, as when the Whitt was designed and built the NCAA rules (from at least 1987 through 2004) called for 200' x 100' rinks.

In 2010 BU replaced the slab at Walter Brown Arena, upgraded the refrigeration plant, the HVAC system and installed A/C. I stopped by one day when the old slab was removed and the new slab wasn’t yet poured. It was something to see dirt/sand instead of concrete where the rink should be. I think the best option for UNH would be to replace the existing slab at the current elevation and then redo the stands to create optimal site lines.

The seating sight lines I find quite interesting, as I measured the Whitt’s riser depth and height to compare with Agganis when it opened. Agganis and the Whitt have the same riser depth, 33”, but Agganis goes up 18?” each row, while the Whitt goes up just 15” (I measured 14?”) each row. I much prefer the elevation and sight lines I have at Agganis to most other Hockey East rinks because of the higher rise between rows. The optimal sight lines shown in the report would have a 21” rise between rows, even more than Agganis’ 18?”. As I like the elevation and sight lines at Agganis I am for this change.

Agganis allows full size trucks and busses directly into the arena, so I’m a bit surprised the Whitt doesn’t. It makes a lot of sense to allow trucks and busses direct access into the building so I’m not sure why it wasn’t originally built to allow it.

Agganis has wasted space as well, but it was/is planned to be the women’s locker room and the athletic offices someday. BU built out the visitor side with a large visitor locker room, as well as additional locker rooms at the end so that you can currently have four teams in the building. It looks like the Whitt could handle four teams, but adding a visitor locker room on the visitor side does make sense.

The cost seems very reasonable at about $9 million for all the renovations. Then again, I'm basing that against the cost of Agganis, the new ASU multipurpose arena and the new SHU multipurpose arena.

Sean

Sean - appreciate the input and comparisons. Couple points of clarification…

1. The estimates you see in this report (for the ice replacement and rink shrink) have gone up materially since this report was put out, when all-in costs are considered. Additionally, the revisions to the bowl have gone up accordingly but still represent about a doubling of the cost if to be done in conjunction with the first part.
2. The “wasted space” component of this report is no longer relevant as it has been subsumed by the aspirational scope of the “guts” project.

I certainly hold out hope that after priority 1 (ice and rink) and priority 2 (guts) are “in the can”, they can get busy with the bowl!
 
Just a few points….

1. Darius was spot on in the other thread. Fixing the cooling system is a “time is of the essence” project. Tight timeframes to get ‘er done.
2. Norbert was spot-on as well. The two need to go hand-in-hand to maximize the economies of scope and minimize the investment to complete the project. Current hope is to complete the project by 9/1.
3. The decision to move to 90 (vs. 85) had nothing to do with sight lines, and everything to do with long-term trends as evidenced by a general move towards a 90-foot surface or the “hybridized” models (think 92.5) being considered worldwide. As one poster mentioned, Agganis built to 90, NU shrunk to 90, and I’ll add that Mariucci is either going to 92.5 or has already done so. Apparently, the IIHF is considering 90 or hybridized sheets, and there are even some in the NHL who’d like to see the sheet grow to meet to game (I think Brian Burke was trying to lead the charge there. Won’t happen anytime soon given the revenue hit, methinks).
4. Changing the bowl would double the price tag. Given the cost of the potential guts renovation, money is probably better directed toward that in order to help turn this program around.
5. I know that they are going to work with any STH who feels their experience is impacted by the 5’ change to get to an agreeable solution. It’s not lost that this will change the experience.

That’s what I know and can share.

What can you share as far as the projected timeframe for the new AD hire, 'dc?
 
So.Will Margel (18-1-3-4)--------Sr.Harrison Blaisdell-(25-2-6-8)------So.Robert Cronin (30-7-5-12)
So.Liam Devlin-(34-9-7-16)-----Fr.Stiven Sardarian--(NA)-------------Fr.Kristap Skrastins (NA)
Fr.Cy Leclerc-(NA)----------------Sr.Chase Stevenson-(33-4-1-5)------Fr.John Evans (NA)
Fr.Jake Dunlap-(NA)--------------Fr.Morgan Winters-(NA)---------------Jr.Nick Cafarelli (15-3-4-7)
Jr.Carsen Richels-(13-0-0-0)-----Jr.Cam Gendron-(19-1-1-2)-----------So.Conor Lovett
So.Connor Sweeney-(22-0-0-0)--Sr.Joe Hankinson (1-0-0-0)


Sr.Kalle Eriksson-(32-0-12-12)----So.Colton Huard (28-6-10-16)
So.Alex Gagne-(33-1-7-8)---------Jr.Luke Reid 34-3-5-8)
Fr.Nick Ardanaz-(NA)---------------Fr.Damien Carfagna (NA)
Jr.Nikolai Jenson-(30-1-5-6)-------Fr.Cade Penney

Fr.Tyler Muszelik----------Sr.David Fessenden------------Jr.Jeremy Forman

At first glance...

Is it me or does this roster look...young? Also abit crowded...no room for any portal players with experience (if that's even out there) Not to take away from these players and our freshmen this season got lots of experience.

Have been following with great interest incoming forwards...can they develop fast enough to bring in much needed offense?

Most interesting to me at least will be the goal tending...excited for Muszelik does he beat out Fess for top tender??? From what we saw of Fess albeit limited thought he did a good job but of course you need lights out most nights. Should be interesting between the two of them.

Alot can happen between now and October!
 
At first glance...

Is it me or does this roster look...young? Also abit crowded...no room for any portal players with experience (if that's even out there) Not to take away from these players and our freshmen this season got lots of experience.

Have been following with great interest incoming forwards...can they develop fast enough to bring in much needed offense?

Most interesting to me at least will be the goal tending...excited for Muszelik does he beat out Fess for top tender??? From what we saw of Fess albeit limited thought he did a good job but of course you need lights out most nights. Should be interesting between the two of them.

Alot can happen between now and October!

I think there is a lot of optimism around this incoming class. More than the “well, we have to be optimistic, don’t we?” vibe. I am sure Watcher has his insights - would love to hear them. ‘Watcher, would also like your rationale for Will over Liam on first line. Are you thinking that you seed both lines with talent? I have no insights there, just interested in your take.
 
Sean - appreciate the input and comparisons. Couple points of clarification…

1. The estimates you see in this report (for the ice replacement and rink shrink) have gone up materially since this report was put out, when all-in costs are considered. Additionally, the revisions to the bowl have gone up accordingly but still represent about a doubling of the cost if to be done in conjunction with the first part.
2. The “wasted space” component of this report is no longer relevant as it has been subsumed by the aspirational scope of the “guts” project.

I certainly hold out hope that after priority 1 (ice and rink) and priority 2 (guts) are “in the can”, they can get busy with the bowl!
Thanks for the updated information. I expected that the costs would have gone up; waiting almost always increases the cost.

To my knowledge BU still hasn't started renovations on the Roof at Case Center, despite annoucing it years ago. The have renovated the main entrance to Case and Walter Brown, but as far as I'm aware that's it. They also wanted to do more when they renovated WBA in 2010 (i.e., new visitor lockerr oom, new extra locker room (for women's Beanpot), new scoreboard/video board, but lack of money curtailed all of that. At least they did the new slab, refrigeration and A/C systems.

Sean
 
Back
Top