So when a bunch of Maine students come to a Maine-UHN game with a giant display that shows a Wildcat giving oral sex to a giant phallus you think that's hilarious, right? Just satire.
Did that really happen? Must have missed it. If it's true OR just an example for your discussion, I can assure you I would not be on here whining about it, or pointing the kids out to arena security in person. I remember when
Animal House was a top grossing film when I was in school - "grossing" both money-wise and humor-wise. I am hardly the arbiter of good taste, but then again, my point is, are USCHO mods supposed to be the arbiters of good taste?
Shawn was a champion of fan involvement. Many times I heard him say that our team always shows respect to the fans; not just Maine fans, but any fans because they are what makes the sport. Fans from Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota and so on have made their way across the country to the tiny town of Orono to support their team. That meant something to Shawn. He also demanded that our fans show respect to those fans from other schools. "Make life difficult for the players, but never the fans." He viewed that arena as our house and the opposing fans as our guests. You don't invite someone over and treat them like ****. There is no doubt in my mind he would have found those students responsible for that stunt and seen to it that they never set foot in Alfond again. Likewise, he abhorred vulgarity. Not because he was Mister Clean (big surprise that he had a vocabulary that would make a sailor blush) but because it was lazy. Yelling, "You suck!" at a player just shows how uncreative you are. He might not have been offended at a bunch of fat jokes, but he wouldn't like them because they're just lazy.
This part is actually somewhat instructive, the more I look at it. There's a fine line sometimes between what's acceptable, and what goes over the line. I'm not sure I agree that Walshy would have banished those kids from Alfond forever. That's a little over-the-top authoritarian, and to bring the hammer down on a bunch of (drunk for the weekend?) kids seems a little heavy-handed, and a little too much of what nowadays would be called virtue signaling. Being an imperfect kind of guy, I suspect the guy who narrowly kept his job due to the grace of the U wouldn't have been calling for permanent bans of kids. Maybe you know differently?
Also, you could take whatever shots you wanted at him. Hell, he was so vain he dyed his moustache which made him the butt of many a joke, but they were aimed at him...his reaction would have been different if someone had lobbed an insult (or a series of them) at one of his assistants. Especially something like fat jokes. Maybe to you it's funny that a coach is overweight, but making light of the situation is just mean.
So let me see if I'm getting this right ... if Coach Barr was the overweight head coach, he's fair game ... but since Fortier is only an assistant, he's in some imaginary protected status? I mean, he's hardly a volunteer, and he's probably getting paid more than 95% of the folks who go to the games at Alfond. Also, does JF strike you as someone asking to be protected? Or does this all just "come with the territory"? It can't be the first time he's encountered this ...
Do you also go the hospital and make fun of sick kids? Head down to the local AA and crack jokes about drunk people? Go to a homeless shelter and ridicule people for being poor? It's not funny. It's not creative. So don't for a moment think you can pretend that Shawn would have supported you making such jokes because he wouldn't have.
For what it's worth, there have been some nasty comments on here over the years about the sobriety (or lack thereof) of a former UMaine star player and HC candidate (more recently), and I don't recall seeing folks "getting the vapors" over it not being "funny or creative". "Funny" and "creative" are up to the readers, last time I checked. bradz's short-lived alternate thread was getting as many (if not more) views per post than this thread (and a fair few others) when you took it down. Finally ... to compare a well-paid professional sports coach to sick kids or homeless people is a bit of a stretch, no? That seems to take this "identity politics" fad a step too far, when protected classes now include "fat white male hockey coach".
Oops ... "assistant" hockey coach, my bad.
Anyway, it seems the prevailing opinion of most of the posters in this thread that the topic should be adhered to. After all, this is a thread about college hockey in a forum devoted to college hockey so people here may want to talk about college hockey - shocking, I know. We have an entire section of the fan forum where you can post whatever you like. Go try out the
Cafe.
The topic ultimately was adhered to here. The stuff taken down was on a separate thread.
You do understand that, right??? Seems pretty simple, but I guess not ...