What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.65: I'm Just Here For The Lincoln Project Ads

Status
Not open for further replies.
FadeToBlack&Gold said:
She's a Republican. That's evidence enough these days.
Click to expand...

Even though we feel the same way about trump and most republicans, Handy has a problem with literally everything I post so he chooses to be contrary, but I didn't know Burd did as well.

I will say that I won't go so far as to just say "she's a republican." But once anyone reads what she has written in the trump case it is clear she lacks judgment and ethics. Her rulings are wholly politicicized. A person in her position should be above reproach when it comes to their duties on the bench. I'm not the only one, and certainly not the most informed one, who has questioned not just the way she has ruled, but that her legal opinions have little basis in case law. I am too far over the top in plenty of my posts, but saying this woman lacks the ethics to serve in the position in which she was given a lifetime appointment is not one of them.
 
I'm comfortable saying that most Republicans today are hypocrites who lack ethics. They are pro-birth, but anti-life. They are pro-woo/wackadoodle and anti-science. They excuse mistakes made by men, but are quick to punish mistakes made by women. They accuse the left of doing everything they do (indoctrinating, grooming, racism, nepotism/political favoritism). They hate all secular education. They supposedly love Jesus, but prefer violence and retribution to turning the other cheek and don't want to actually help the poor.
 
FadeToBlack&Gold said:
I'm comfortable saying that most Republicans today are hypocrites who lack ethics. They are pro-birth, but anti-life. They are pro-woo/wackadoodle and anti-science. They excuse mistakes made by men, but are quick to punish mistakes made by women. They accuse the left of doing everything they do (indoctrinating, grooming, racism, nepotism/political favoritism). They hate all secular education. They supposedly love Jesus, but prefer violence and retribution to turning the other cheek and don't want to actually help the poor.
Click to expand...

They have really gone out of their way to make voting easy. I used to actually read the opinions for the voting guides just to make sure- even though I always ended up voting D. Now, though, nothing R's say have any significant value in terms of truth or actual policy- so there's no point in actually voting for them.

It was sad to see the r ads in Ohio, bringing up their race baiting immigration crap and well as pretending to care for spending and a deficit. Same old same old, and people some how eat it up when the ONLY promise kept was cutting taxes for the rich.

Heck, even one lambasted Biden for not finishing the wall when the reality is that dumpy and his cronies have been taking money from their worshipers that donated to have the wall made. But given the last couple of decades, not all that shocking.
 
WeAreNDHockey said:
Even though we feel the same way about trump and most republicans, Handy has a problem with literally everything I post so he chooses to be contrary, but I didn't know Burd did as well.

I will say that I won't go so far as to just say "she's a republican." But once anyone reads what she has written in the trump case it is clear she lacks judgment and ethics. Her rulings are wholly politicicized. A person in her position should be above reproach when it comes to their duties on the bench. I'm not the only one, and certainly not the most informed one, who has questioned not just the way she has ruled, but that her legal opinions have little basis in case law. I am too far over the top in plenty of my posts, but saying this woman lacks the ethics to serve in the position in which she was given a lifetime appointment is not one of them.
Click to expand...

Maybe I wouldn't have a problem with everything you post if it didn't sound like the ravings of the crazies on the other side. We may be on the same side of an issue (almost all issues I'm sure) but you are getting out there with your rhetoric and I'm not going to ignore that just cause we are both liberals.
 
Last edited:
FadeToBlack&Gold said:
I'm comfortable saying that most Republicans today are hypocrites who lack ethics. They are pro-birth, but anti-life. They are pro-woo/wackadoodle and anti-science. They excuse mistakes made by men, but are quick to punish mistakes made by women. They accuse the left of doing everything they do (indoctrinating, grooming, racism, nepotism/political favoritism). They hate all secular education. They supposedly love Jesus, but prefer violence and retribution to turning the other cheek and don't want to actually help the poor.
Click to expand...

That doesn't answer burds question though.

It's not like it is an either or thing. She can be a complete crackpot but still have the qualifications to be a judge. The opposite is true as well...

Put another way...she isn't a bad judge cause she is unqualified she is a bad judge because she appears to let her crackpot bias take precedence over the actual law. That is why no one outside maybe Alan Dershowitz thinks her rulings make any sense no matter where they fall on the spectrum.
 
I'm figuring that reasoning is mostly bullshit, but I'm perfectly fine with it. The less Donnie keeps getting coddled on this where you and I would be in jail from day one still awaiting bail, the better.

Lock him up.
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
He packed the boxes himself.

did he think no one would ever find out documents were missing?

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1577067477745692673?s=46&t=j3cNYfjZMNqOX56L9cpEYQ
Click to expand...

Also: https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1577063450916028416?t=Qr5nLE_etSypRvhdeHR2Aw&s=19

Breaking WaPo: Trump asked one of his lawyers to tell the National Archives in early 2022 that Trump had returned all materials requested by the agency, but the lawyer declined because he wasn't sure the statement was true.
Click to expand...
 
Well, given his girth, it’s not shocking that some small planets revolve around him
 
yt7hgo0q3kr91.jpg
 
aparch said:
Trump, unhappy how his federal trial is shaking out, has asked SCOTUS to intervene on his behalf.
Click to expand...

He's claiming that the circuit court that covers the court that ruled for him does not have jurisdiction to overrule it. How, exactly?

(ok, I'm hearing about it as I type- the question is if the decision was appealable, which the 11th court already said it was.

This will be interesting how it comes down.

Stalling some more
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top