What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Covfefe-19 The 12th Part: The Only Thing Worse Than This New Board Is TrumpVirus2020

Status
Not open for further replies.
My fiance wants to go back to the office and actually volunteered to do so (she has ADHD and would work better in a formal office setting). Was all set to go last week, then got informed by her director that her position is now perma-remote and she was not to return to the office. She also learned that only 4 people volunteered to go back.

She was told that she might be able to return in January when the non-remote positions are expected to begin returning, but I have a feeling where this is all going. She works for an insurance company in Detroit that was purchased by one of the giants last year. I think they're going to close the Detroit office altogether, or at least move it to a smaller, cheaper location (it's currently downtown). Which would mean she likely won't get a seat assignment and won't be able to return at all. Not great news for her, if that happens.
 
Maybe we're going from the factory system back to cottage industry.

We don't really need the mass, concentrated populations of the 20th century for most work anymore. If you're building an airplane or staffing a hospital, yes. But not if you're an IT or financial services company.

World population in 1750 was 830 million. Just sayin'.
 
Last edited:
Went to grab a couple Abbott home tests to have on hand and test my wife tomorrow.

I thought the people in Eagan (only place that had any relatively close) were going to start fighting over the tests. Glad I ordered ahead.


fuck it's ugly out there.
 
Went to grab a couple Abbott home tests to have on hand and test my wife tomorrow.

I thought the people in Eagan (only place that had any relatively close) were going to start fighting over the tests. Glad I ordered ahead.


fuck it's ugly out there.

Why's it so bad right now?
 
Why's it so bad right now?

Getting cold. Same thing happened last year. Same thing happened before with the flu. Cold climates force everyone inside.

plus it's right before thanksgiving so everyone is doing the same thing we did and testing before having everyone over.
 
Say it with me, y'all:

Sea-son-al. Ain't the mask.

Ain't the plexiglass.

Aint' any other purportedly-virtuous behavior.

But it IS time to move on.

FEmnJrlXMAcvcrA
 
Getting cold. Same thing happened last year. Same thing happened before with the flu. Cold climates force everyone inside.

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/h...rch/05flu.html

Flu season in northern latitudes is from November to March, the coldest months. In southern latitudes, it is from May until September. In the tropics, there is not much flu at all and no real flu season.

There was no shortage of hypotheses. Some said flu came in winter because people are indoors; and children are in school, crowded together, getting the flu and passing it on to their families.

Others proposed a diminished immune response because people make less vitamin D or melatonin when days are shorter. Others pointed to the direction of air currents in the upper atmosphere. But many scientists were not convinced.

“We know one of the largest factors is kids in school -- most of the major epidemics are traced to children,” said Dr. Jonathan McCullers, a flu researcher at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis. “But that still does not explain wintertime. We don’t see flu in September and October.”

As for the crowding argument, Dr. McCullers said, “That never made sense.” People work all year round and crowd into buses and subways and planes no matter what the season.

“We needed some actual data,” Dr. McCullers added.

But getting data was surprisingly difficult, Dr. Palese said.

The ideal study would expose people to the virus under different conditions and ask how likely they were to become infected. Such a study, Dr. Palese said, would not be permitted because there would be no benefit to the individuals.

There were no suitable test animals. Mice can be infected with the influenza virus but do not transmit it. Ferrets can be infected and transmit the virus, but they are somewhat large, they bite and they are expensive, so researchers would rather not work with them.

To his surprise, Dr. Palese stumbled upon a solution that appeared to be a good second best.

Reading a paper published in 1919 in the Journal of the American Medical Association on the flu epidemic at Camp Cody in New Mexico, he came upon a key passage: “It is interesting to note that very soon after the epidemic of influenza reached this camp, our laboratory guinea pigs began to die.” At first, the study’s authors wrote, they thought the animals had died from food poisoning. But, they continued, “a necropsy on a dead pig revealed unmistakable signs of pneumonia.”

Dr. Palese bought some guinea pigs and exposed them to the flu virus. Just as the paper suggested, they got the flu and spread it among themselves. So Dr. Palese and his colleagues began their experiments.

By varying air temperature and humidity in the guinea pigs’ quarters, they discovered that transmission was excellent at 41 degrees. It declined as the temperature rose until, by 86 degrees, the virus was not transmitted at all.

The virus was transmitted best at a low humidity, 20 percent, and not transmitted at all when the humidity reached 80 percent.

The animals also released viruses nearly two days longer at 41 degrees than at a typical room temperature of 68 degrees.

Flu viruses spread through the air, unlike cold viruses, Dr. Palese said, which primarily spread by direct contact when people touch surfaces that had been touched by someone with a cold or shake hands with someone who is infected, for example.

Flu viruses are more stable in cold air, and low humidity also helps the virus particles remain in the air. That is because the viruses float in the air in little respiratory droplets, Dr. Palese said. When the air is humid, those droplets pick up water, grow larger and fall to the ground.

But Dr. Palese does not suggest staying in a greenhouse all winter to avoid the flu. The best strategy, he says, is a flu shot.

It is unclear why infected animals released viruses for a longer time at lower temperatures. There was no difference in their immune response, but one possibility is that their upper airways are cooler, making the virus residing there more stable.

Flu researchers said they were delighted to get some solid data at last on flu seasonality.

“It was great work, and work that needed to be done,” said Dr. Terrence Tumpe, a senior microbiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. McCullers said he was pleased to see something convincing on the flu season question.

“It was a really interesting paper, the first really scientific approach, to answer a classic question that we’ve been debating for years and years,” he said.
 
Last edited:
Got boosted Monday at the local Meijer. No big deal other than the booster knocked me on my arse for 24h. I found this very surprising as I had zero issues from the first two shots.
 
The lower temp/lower humidity hypothesis is also why we think it spreads so easily among hockey teams. Minnesota youth teams provided ample data here
 
Sucks to be wrong.

And to think, they also proved Darwin to be correct. I love unintended consequences…

The really sad part is that they constantly see their own kind die off from the virus, and they are so stubborn that they continue to push out the BS stories. If people are that incapable of learning from other people's mistakes, it's pretty clear to me that they won't be capable of producing anything new or interesting because they can't believe other results. It's no wonder that small businesses continue to fail at a consistent rate for the exact same reasons. Or why large companies are constantly doing the same mistakes, both with each other and repeating ones that were failures in their own past.
 
The really sad part is that they constantly see their own kind die off from the virus, and they are so stubborn that they continue to push out the BS stories. If people are that incapable of learning from other people's mistakes, it's pretty clear to me that they won't be capable of producing anything new or interesting because they can't believe other results. It's no wonder that small businesses continue to fail at a consistent rate for the exact same reasons. Or why large companies are constantly doing the same mistakes, both with each other and repeating ones that were failures in their own past.

"Your inability to understand science is not an argument against it."

Except for these folks…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top